public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew W Carlis <mattc@purestorage.com>
To: macro@orcam.me.uk
Cc: ahuang12@lenovo.com, alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com,
	ashishk@purestorage.com, bamstadt@purestorage.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, jiwei.sun.bj@qq.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	lukas@wunner.de, mattc@purestorage.com, msaggi@purestorage.com,
	sconnor@purestorage.com, sunjw10@lenovo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Fix the PCIe bridge decreasing to Gen 1 during hotplug testing
Date: Wed,  3 Dec 2025 18:40:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251204014020.1426-1-mattc@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2511290245460.36486@angie.orcam.me.uk>

On  Mon, 1 Dec 2025, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> Discard Vendor:Device ID matching in the PCIe failed link retraining 
> quirk and ignore the link status for the removal of the 2.5GT/s speed 
> clamp, whether applied by the quirk itself or the firmware earlier on.  
> Revert to the original target link speed if this final link retraining 
> has failed.

I think we should either remove the quirk or only execute the quirk when the
downstream port is the specific ASMedia 0x2824. Hardware companies that
develop PCIe devices rely on the linux kernel for a significant amount of
their testing & the action taken by this quirk is going to introduce
noise into those tests by initiating unexpected speed changes etc.

As long as we have this quirk messing with link speeds we'll just
continue to see issue reports over time in my opinion.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-04  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-01  3:52 [PATCH] PCI: Always lift 2.5GT/s restriction in PCIe failed link retraining Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-12-01  9:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-01 13:55   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-12-01 16:48     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-08 19:24     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-12-02 13:49 ` [External] : " ALOK TIWARI
2025-12-02 16:07   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-03 19:01     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-12-08 19:25       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-12-04  1:40 ` Matthew W Carlis [this message]
2025-12-04 23:43   ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Fix the PCIe bridge decreasing to Gen 1 during hotplug testing Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-12-04 18:30 ` [PATCH] PCI: Always lift 2.5GT/s restriction in PCIe failed link retraining Matthew W Carlis
2025-12-08 19:25   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-10 13:44 [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Fix the PCIe bridge decreasing to Gen 1 during hotplug testing Jiwei Sun
2025-01-11 16:00 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-13 12:44   ` Jiwei
2025-01-13 15:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-01-14 15:04   ` Jiwei
2025-01-14 18:25     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-01-15 10:18       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-01-15 11:39       ` Jiwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251204014020.1426-1-mattc@purestorage.com \
    --to=mattc@purestorage.com \
    --cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
    --cc=alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com \
    --cc=ashishk@purestorage.com \
    --cc=bamstadt@purestorage.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jiwei.sun.bj@qq.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=msaggi@purestorage.com \
    --cc=sconnor@purestorage.com \
    --cc=sunjw10@lenovo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox