public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
	Eric.VanTassell@amd.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com,
	wanghuiqiang@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: RFC about how to obtain PCIE TPH steer-tag on ARM64 platform
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 13:32:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260116193203.GA959102@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5106e61-adec-4c7f-af64-9782a81a5954@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:21:30AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> On 1/15/2026 1:03 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 11:39:27AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> >> On 1/14/2026 3:07 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:01:31AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> We want to enable PCIE TPH feature on ARM64 platform, but we encounter the
> >>>> following problem:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. The pcie_tph_get_cpu_st() function invokes the ACPI DSM method to
> >>>>    obtain the steer-tag of the CPU. According to the definition of
> >>>>    the DSM method [1], the cpu_uid should be "ACPI processor uid".
> >>>
> >>>> 2. In the current implementation, the ACPI DSM method is invoked
> >>>>    directly using the logical core number, which works on the x86
> >>>>    platform but does not work on the ARM64 platform because the
> >>>>    logical core ID is not the same as the ACPI processor ID when the
> >>>>    PG exists.
> >>>
> >>> PG?
> >>
> >> partial good
> > 
> > I still don't know what "partial good" means :)  Is that something
> > from a spec?
> 
> Because of some issues (like manufacturing variances), certain circuits
> (e.g., some cores) might not work normally. For these cases, we can use
> the part at a reduced specification, which is the PG mentioned here.

Ah, got it :)  If you go this direction, maybe you can expand that
part of the commit log a bit, since I don't think "PG" or "partial
good" is a widely-known term.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-16 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-12  3:01 RFC about how to obtain PCIE TPH steer-tag on ARM64 platform fengchengwen
2026-01-13 19:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-13 22:38   ` Wei Huang
2026-01-14  3:52     ` fengchengwen
2026-01-14 16:36       ` Wei Huang
2026-01-16  0:14         ` fengchengwen
2026-01-14  3:39   ` fengchengwen
2026-01-14 17:03     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-16  0:21       ` fengchengwen
2026-01-16 19:32         ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-01-19  0:17           ` fengchengwen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260116193203.GA959102@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Eric.VanTassell@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox