From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 16:11:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530161108.993C21F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530153101.695580-3-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Direct usage of cached `pci->pcie_cap` leads to incorrect offset calculation and DBI corruption in endpoint drivers with deferred hardware enablement.
--
commit 02cd0d194f8ffdc28d0564602c5f35da3c6e8582
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core
This patch modifies the DWC core functions to use the cached pcie_cap offset
instead of calling dw_pcie_find_capability() each time. The cached offset is
initialized after hardware is supposedly ready in host and endpoint modes.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index a396b58d67462..11b4fa6d129c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1524,6 +1524,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> if (ep->ops->pre_init)
> ep->ops->pre_init(ep);
>
> + dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap(pci);
> +
[Severity: High]
Does this code incorrectly attempt to read the capability offset before the
hardware is powered on in endpoint drivers with deferred enablement, like
qcom-pcie-ep?
In these drivers, hardware resources like clocks and PHY are not enabled
during initial probe, but are deferred until the host de-asserts PERST#.
Because the DBI space is unclocked and inaccessible at this time, reading it
can either trigger a synchronous external abort or return 0xFFFFFFFF.
This would cause the capability search to fail, leaving pci->pcie_cap as 0.
> ret = pci_epc_mem_init(epc, ep->phys_base, ep->addr_size,
> ep->page_size);
> if (ret < 0) {
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 37d2715e38eb4..810e920c1d8b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -848,7 +847,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_pcie_upconfig_setup);
> static void dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> {
> u32 cap, ctrl2, link_speed;
> - u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + u8 offset = pci->pcie_cap;
>
> cap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
[Severity: High]
If pci->pcie_cap is 0 due to the earlier failed capability search in
dw_pcie_ep_init(), will this read and write to offset 0 (the standard PCI
configuration space header) instead of the actual PCIe capability offset?
Since dw_pcie_setup() calls this function after the link is initialized,
operating on offset 0 could corrupt the Vendor ID and Device ID, completely
breaking link initialization.
[ ... ]
> @@ -940,10 +937,9 @@ static void dw_pcie_link_set_max_link_width(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 num_lanes)
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, plc);
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, lwsc);
>
> - cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> - lnkcap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> + lnkcap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, pci->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> FIELD_MODIFY(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW, &lnkcap, num_lanes);
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, lnkcap);
> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, pci->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, lnkcap);
> }
[Severity: High]
Could this similarly corrupt the standard PCI configuration space header at
offset 0 if pci->pcie_cap was not properly initialized?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260530153101.695580-1-18255117159@163.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-30 15:30 [PATCH v2 00/16] PCI: dwc: Cache PCIe capability offset and simplify drivers Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] PCI: dwc: Add pcie_cap field and helper in designware header Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] PCI: dwc: meson: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] PCI: dwc: rockchip: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 17:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] PCI: dwc: eswin: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] PCI: dwc: fu740: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] PCI: dwc: intel-gw: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] PCI: dwc: qcom: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] PCI: dwc: sophgo: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] PCI: dwc: spacemit-k1: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] PCI: dwc: spear13xx: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] PCI: dwc: tegra194: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] PCI: dwc: ultrarisc: " Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260530161108.993C21F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox