From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] PCI: dwc: sophgo: Use cached PCIe capability offset
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 16:25:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530162504.798CD1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530153101.695580-13-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing `.deinit` callback causes IRQ domain leak and leaves a dangling chained IRQ handler if `dw_pcie_host_init()` fails.
--
commit bec8b7e2c9e17ca16137f5895fed067563f850fa
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: dwc: sophgo: Use cached PCIe capability offset
dw_pcie_host_init() calls .init before caching, so we must call
dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap() inside .init. The hardware is already enabled by
the driver's own initialization before this point. The helper will cache
the offset and avoid redundant searches.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sophgo.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sophgo.c
> index 044088898819e..39703d2b7b5f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sophgo.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sophgo.c
> @@ -164,9 +164,10 @@ static void sophgo_pcie_msi_enable(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> static void sophgo_pcie_disable_l0s_l1(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> {
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> - u32 offset, val;
> + u8 offset;
> + u32 val;
>
> - offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + offset = dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap(pci);
>
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing this init sequence,
I noticed a potential resource leak and dangling pointer on the error path.
If dw_pcie_host_init() fails (e.g. due to a link training timeout), it invokes
the .deinit callback to tear down host-specific resources. However, the driver
is missing a .deinit callback:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sophgo.c:
static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops sophgo_pcie_host_ops = {
.init = sophgo_pcie_host_init,
};
In sophgo_pcie_host_init(), an IRQ domain and a chained handler are set up:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sophgo.c:sophgo_pcie_host_init() {
...
irq = sophgo_pcie_init_irq_domain(pp);
if (irq < 0)
return irq;
irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, sophgo_pcie_intx_handler, pp);
...
}
Because there is no .deinit callback, the IRQ domain and chained handler are
never removed when dw_pcie_host_init() fails.
When sophgo_pcie_probe() returns an error, devres will free the struct
sophgo_pcie (which contains pp).
If the parent interrupt fires later, could the dangling chained handler
(sophgo_pcie_intx_handler) execute and dereference the freed pp pointer,
leading to a use-after-free panic?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260530153101.695580-1-18255117159@163.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-30 15:30 [PATCH v2 00/16] PCI: dwc: Cache PCIe capability offset and simplify drivers Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] PCI: dwc: Add pcie_cap field and helper in designware header Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] PCI: dwc: meson: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] PCI: dwc: rockchip: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 17:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] PCI: dwc: eswin: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] PCI: dwc: fu740: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] PCI: dwc: intel-gw: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] PCI: dwc: qcom: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] PCI: dwc: sophgo: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] PCI: dwc: spacemit-k1: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] PCI: dwc: spear13xx: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] PCI: dwc: tegra194: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] PCI: dwc: ultrarisc: " Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260530162504.798CD1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox