From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] PCI/ASPM: Transition the device to D0 (if required) when enabling ASPM link states
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:50:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708145022.8A26E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-pci-aspm-fix-v3-3-6bd72451746e@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Moving the D0 power state transition inside __pci_enable_link_state introduces a TOCTOU race leading to a Use-After-Free of the ASPM link pointer.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 3/8] PCI/ASPM: Transition the device to D0 (if required) when enabling ASPM link states ---
commit abe3f397e26797e78eb9f5d0555a20f019b19168
Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
PCI/ASPM: Transition the device to D0 (if required) when enabling ASPM link states
This commit moves the D0 power state transition into the shared
__pci_enable_link_state() helper when enabling PCI-PM L1 PM Substates.
This centralizes the transition for all callers and removes the redundant
D0 transitions from the vmd and pcie-qcom drivers.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index c04fb71de91c8..6d6862fd2ebb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -1524,6 +1524,17 @@ static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool locked,
> return -EPERM;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Ensure the device is in D0 before enabling PCI-PM L1 PM Substates, per
> + * PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4.
> + */
> + if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_SS_PCIPM) {
> + if (locked)
> + pci_set_power_state_locked(pdev, PCI_D0);
> + else
> + pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
[Severity: High]
Does this change introduce a use-after-free if the device is concurrently
hot-removed?
The link pointer is fetched at the top of __pci_enable_link_state()
locklessly:
struct pcie_link_state *link = pcie_aspm_get_link(pdev);
If a caller uses the unlocked APIs, the new code takes the else branch and
calls pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0). This transition can sleep for tens
of milliseconds without holding pci_bus_sem.
Could a concurrent hot-remove free the link structure while this thread is
sleeping?
CPU1 (Unlocked API):
__pci_enable_link_state()
link = pcie_aspm_get_link(pdev);
// ...
pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0); // Sleeps without pci_bus_sem
CPU2 (Hot-remove):
pci_destroy_dev()
pcie_aspm_exit_link_state()
// Acquires ASPM locks and frees the `link` structure
CPU1 (wakes up):
down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
link->aspm_default = pci_calc_aspm_enable_mask(state);
Would CPU1 end up writing to the freed pcie_link_state structure when it
resumes and modifies link->aspm_default?
> + }
> +
> if (!locked)
> down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
> mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708-pci-aspm-fix-v3-0-6bd72451746e@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 14:30 [PATCH v3 0/8] PCI/ASPM: Add pci_force_enable_link_state() API and convert Atheros drivers Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] PCI/ASPM: Always disable ASPM when driver requests it Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] PCI/ASPM: Add pci_force_enable_link_state() API Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] PCI/ASPM: Transition the device to D0 (if required) when enabling ASPM link states Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] PCI/ASPM: Improve the kernel-doc for pci_{enable,disable}_link_state*() APIs Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] PCI/ASPM: Return enabled ASPM states from pcie_aspm_enabled() API Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] wifi: ath12k: Use pci_{enable/disable}_link_state() APIs to enable/disable ASPM states Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 20:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] wifi: ath11k: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] wifi: ath10k: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-08 14:51 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708145022.8A26E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox