From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:28:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804142826.BBE161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-12-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The workqueue `ibi->wq` is leaked on the error path if `master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req)` fails.
--
--- Patch [11]: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices ---
commit a4ace89706edbc3219fece43aaef4d3c3e594148
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices
This commit updates i3c_device_request_ibi() to verify that a device
advertises IBI support before attempting to set up IBI handling. If the
device lacks the I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP capability, it now returns early
with -EOPNOTSUPP.
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/device.c b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> index 5e6df6de02834..f1ba363b22a17 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> @@ -204,12 +204,14 @@ int i3c_device_request_ibi(struct i3c_device *dev,
> return ret;
>
> i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(dev->bus);
> - if (dev->desc) {
> + if (!dev->desc) {
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + } else if (!(dev->desc->info.bcr & I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP)) {
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + } else {
> mutex_lock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
> ret = i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked(dev->desc, req);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch interacts closely with IBI
request error handling, I noticed a potential resource leak in the underlying
i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() function.
Does this code leak the newly allocated workqueue if the request fails?
drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() {
...
ibi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(i3cdev_to_dev(dev->dev)), WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
...
ret = master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req);
if (ret) {
kfree(ibi);
dev->ibi = NULL;
}
return ret;
}
Should destroy_workqueue(ibi->wq) be called before kfree(ibi) on this error
path to prevent leaking the workqueue if a driver repeatedly fails to request
an IBI?
> mutex_unlock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
> - } else {
> - ret = -ENOENT;
> }
> i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(dev->bus);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 13:37 [PATCH V3 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:46 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 22:10 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 17:33 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:08 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:12 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 17:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:21 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:52 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 19:28 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804142826.BBE161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox