From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:10:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804151019.BCAA81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-10-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Unprotected dereference of dev->dev in i3c_master_queue_ibi() leading to NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free during teardown.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Race condition between hardware IBI interrupts and IBI teardown leading to Use-After-Free of dev->ibi.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs ---
commit 044b30e8813c466ee0c955f282a081170370a564
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs
When an IBI is queued for processing, this commit records a wakeup event
for the device if wakeup is enabled. It uses a 100 ms processing interval
to give the I3C device driver time to process the IBI.
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index e6b320da475e0..8c9e62e6f1469 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -3398,6 +3401,9 @@ void i3c_master_queue_ibi(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev, struct i3c_ibi_slot *slot)
> if (!dev->ibi || !slot)
> return;
>
> + if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev->dev))
> + pm_wakeup_event(&dev->dev->dev, I3C_WAKEUP_PROCESSING_TIME_MS);
> +
[Severity: High]
Is it possible for an IBI interrupt to fire concurrently with device
unregistration?
Looking at i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs(), the teardown path sets
dev->dev to NULL:
drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs() {
...
i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL;
put_device(&i3cdev->dev->dev);
i3cdev->dev = NULL;
...
}
If an interrupt occurs during or just after this unregistration, could
dev->dev be NULL when device_may_wakeup() dereferences it here?
> atomic_inc(&dev->ibi->pending_ibis);
> queue_work(dev->ibi->wq, &slot->work);
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a race condition between hardware
IBI interrupts and IBI teardown leading to a use-after-free of dev->ibi?
In i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked(), the code checks the pending_ibis counter:
drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked() {
...
if (atomic_read(&dev->ibi->pending_ibis))
wait_for_completion(&dev->ibi->all_ibis_handled);
...
}
If a hardirq handler is already executing but has not yet called
i3c_master_queue_ibi() to increment pending_ibis, the teardown path might
assume no IBIs are pending and proceed to free dev->ibi in
i3c_dev_free_ibi_locked().
When the interrupted CPU resumes, wouldn't it execute this atomic_inc() and
queue_work() on the freed dev->ibi pointer since there is no
synchronize_irq() to drain active hardirqs?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 13:37 [PATCH V3 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:46 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 22:10 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 17:33 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:08 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:12 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 17:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:21 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 16:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:52 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 19:28 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804151019.BCAA81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox