From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Szymon Durawa" <szymon.durawa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] PCI: vmd: Add vmd_configure_cfgbar() helper function
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:02:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806200229.DD2A11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806221351.38592-3-szymon.durawa@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but there is a missing explicit `pci_free_irq_vectors()` on error paths and during device removal after a successful `pci_alloc_irq_vectors()` call, violating PCI subsystem guidelines.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v6 2/8] PCI: vmd: Add vmd_configure_cfgbar() helper function ---
commit bf3d098aa64842079a8c08e82a92ab1a8a2d4175
Author: Szymon Durawa <szymon.durawa@linux.intel.com>
PCI: vmd: Add vmd_configure_cfgbar() helper function
Move the VMD CFGBAR initialization code to a new helper
vmd_configure_cfgbar(). No functional changes.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> index 070b247b3fbbe..2c824660cabd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -857,13 +869,7 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - res = &vmd->dev->resource[VMD_CFGBAR];
> - vmd->resources[0] = (struct resource) {
> - .name = "VMD CFGBAR",
> - .start = vmd->busn_start,
> - .end = vmd->busn_start + (resource_size(res) >> 20) - 1,
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_BUS | IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED,
> - };
> + vmd_configure_cfgbar(vmd);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while looking at
vmd_enable_domain() I noticed we might be leaking IRQ resources on error paths.
Earlier during setup, vmd_alloc_irqs() successfully calls
pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). However, if an error occurs later in
vmd_enable_domain(), the error paths exit like this:
pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(sd->domain);
pci_free_resource_list(&resources);
vmd_remove_irq_domain(vmd);
return -ENODEV;
Should there be a call to pci_free_irq_vectors() before returning to avoid
leaking vectors and potentially exhausting system IRQ capacity?
Similarly, the device removal logic in vmd_remove() also appears to omit the
pci_free_irq_vectors() cleanup step entirely. Does the driver need a manual
cleanup step here as well?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806221351.38592-1-szymon.durawa@linux.intel.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 22:13 [PATCH v6 0/8] VMD add second root bus support Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] PCI: vmd: Add vmd_bus_enumeration() helper function Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] PCI: vmd: Add vmd_configure_cfgbar() " Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] PCI: vmd: Add vmd_configure_membar() and vmd_configure_membar1_membar2() Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] PCI: vmd: Add vmd_create_bus() Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] PCI: vmd: Replace hardcoded values with enum and defines Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] PCI: vmd: Convert bus and busn_start to an array Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] PCI: vmd: Add support for second rootbus under VMD Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] PCI: vmd: Add workaround for bus number hardwired to fixed non-zero value Szymon Durawa
2026-08-06 20:22 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806200229.DD2A11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=szymon.durawa@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox