Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] rust: mem: add `AsRepr` and `AsReprMut`
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:19:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819111928.959791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819-typed_register-v3-3-3699a75fadf1@garyguo.net>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Incorrect use of `#[inline(always)]` instead of `#[inline]` for abstraction trait methods.
- [Low] The commit message asserts that 'all repr types are normalized to unsigned integers', but pointer types use `*const c_void` as their representation.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 03/16] rust: mem: add `AsRepr` and `AsReprMut` ---
commit 0638c4f7e52f9eb87681654296d18ff15c916f15
Author: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>

rust: mem: add AsRepr and AsReprMut

This commit adds AsRepr and AsReprMut traits to indicate that a type
can be turned into a primitive for operations like atomics and I/O. It
also provides implementations for booleans, pointers, and integers.

> To avoid duplicating implementation, all repr types are normalized to
> unsigned integers.

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the commit message states that all repr types are
normalized to unsigned integers. However, the implementations for *mut T
and *const T use *const c_void as their representation instead of an
unsigned integer. Should the commit message or the pointer implementations
be updated to match?

> diff --git a/rust/kernel/mem.rs b/rust/kernel/mem.rs
> index a0901cbe1b2d6..5bce381d88952 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/mem.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/mem.rs
[ ... ]
> +pub unsafe trait AsRepr: Sized {
> +    /// Primitive representation of this type.
> +    type Repr;
> +
> +    /// Convert from [`AsRepr::Repr`] to `Self`.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// `repr` must be a valid bit patern of `Self`. If `repr` is previously obtained using
> +    /// [`AsRepr::into_repr`], then it will always be safe.
> +    #[inline(always)]
> +    unsafe fn from_repr_unchecked(repr: Self::Repr) -> Self {

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but is #[inline(always)] the intended attribute here?
The Rust subsystem guidelines state that functions for abstractions should
be annotated with #[inline] unless they use build_assert!() dependent on
function parameters.

> +        // SAFETY: Per safety requirement of the trait.
> +        unsafe { transmute_unchecked(repr) }
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Convert from `Self` to [`AsRepr::Repr`].
> +    #[inline(always)]
> +    fn into_repr(this: Self) -> Self::Repr {

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but this method might also need to use #[inline] rather
than #[inline(always)] for the same reason.

> +        // SAFETY: Per safety requirement of the trait.
> +        unsafe { transmute_unchecked(this) }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +/// Type that is bi-directionally transmutable with a primitive representation.
> +///
> +/// # Safety
> +///
> +/// - [`Self`] must be [transmutable] from [`Self::Repr`].
> +/// - Note that [`Self::Repr`] must be [transmutable] from `Self` as well, however that is a
> +///   requirement of the [`AsRepr`] super trait already.
> +///
> +/// [`transmutable`]: core::mem::transmute
> +pub unsafe trait AsReprMut: AsRepr {
> +    /// Convert from [`AsRepr::Repr`] to `Self`.
> +    #[inline(always)]
> +    fn from_repr(repr: Self::Repr) -> Self {

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but would it be better to use #[inline] here to follow
the abstraction guidelines?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819-typed_register-v3-0-3699a75fadf1@garyguo.net?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-19 11:09 [PATCH v3 00/16] rust: io: support register projections and remove relative registers Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] rust: io: register: reimplement as proc macro Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] rust: mem: add `transmute` with deferred size check Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] rust: mem: add `AsRepr` and `AsReprMut` Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:19   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] rust: io: perform conversions using `AsRepr` Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] rust: io: support register projections Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] rust: io: register: allow explicit base type specification Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] gpu: nova-core: specify base type for registers Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] drm/tyr: " Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] samples: rust: pci: " Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] rust: io: register: make register have a typed base Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] rust: io: register: support fixed offset register without bitfield Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] gpu: nova-core: use projection for PFALCON and PFALCON2 registers Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] gpu: nova-core: convert hshub0 from relative register to projection Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] rust: io: register: remove relative registers Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] rust: io: register: remove `Register` trait and cleanup macro Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] rust: io: register: unify handling of register with/without bitfields Gary Guo
2026-08-19 11:26   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260819111928.959791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox