From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, jic23@kernel.org, dave.jiang@intel.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
djbw@kernel.org, iweiny@kernel.org, ming.li@zohomail.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
lukas@wunner.de, riana.tauro@intel.com,
michal.wajdeczko@intel.com, matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/ras: Enable SGUnit PCIe error reporting
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826212619.GA1566339@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825054312.1319951-3-raag.jadav@intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 11:12:51AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> SGUnit as a PCI endpoint is not AER capable and requires explicit
> programming of error reporting bits in DevCtl register of it's config
> space for upstream error propagation. Hack it.
s/it's/its/
> While at it, add native AER sanity check for upstream port before
> programming SGUnit register.
>
> This is as per pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() logic implemented
> in PCIe AER driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> index de4cb9ef7355..c4b5c0b5eb0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> */
>
> +#include <linux/aer.h>
> +
> #include "xe_debugfs.h"
> #include "xe_device.h"
> #include "xe_drm_ras.h"
> @@ -234,6 +236,9 @@ static struct pci_dev *find_usp_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return pci_upstream_bridge(vsp);
> }
>
> +#define PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS (PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_CERE | PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_NFERE | \
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_FERE | PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_URRE)
Ugh :) Duplicate of what's in drivers/pci/pci.h.
> static void ras_usp_aer_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> @@ -251,6 +256,14 @@ static void ras_usp_aer_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> return;
> }
>
> + if (!pcie_aer_is_native(usp)) {
> + dev_warn(&usp->dev, "No native AER support\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pcie_capability_set_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS);
The PCI core calls pci_aer_init() for every device, which only calls
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() to set PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS when the
device itself has an AER Capability.
Setting PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS enables the device to send ERR_* messages
upstream. *Maybe* enabling those has something to do with whether the
Root Port (the ultimate consumer of those ERR_* messages) supports
AER, but I don't think it is related to whether the device *itself*
has an AER Capability.
It seems to me like the PCI core should do
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() independent of whether the device
has an AER Capability.
> + pci_save_state(pdev);
> +
> /*
> * Clear any stale Uncorrectable Internal Error Status event in Uncorrectable Error
> * Status Register.
> @@ -279,6 +292,7 @@ static void ras_usp_aer_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> pci_save_state(usp);
> dev_dbg(&usp->dev, "Uncorrectable Internal Errors downgraded and unmasked\n");
> }
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("AER");
>
> static void ras_send_error_event(struct xe_device *xe, u8 severity, u8 component)
> {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 5:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] Export pcie_aer_is_native() to AER namespace Raag Jadav
2026-08-25 5:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/AER: " Raag Jadav
2026-08-25 5:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 14:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 15:05 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-25 15:25 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 15:41 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-25 15:00 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-25 5:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/ras: Enable SGUnit PCIe error reporting Raag Jadav
2026-08-25 5:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 21:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826212619.GA1566339@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox