From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Navon John Lukose" <navonjohnlukose@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless v2 1/3] wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: don't infer CSME presence from a failed read
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:15:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831131514.3A1FF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831130332.323549-2-navonjohnlukose@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing cancellation of `me_recheck_wk` delayed work in the probe error path leads to a use-after-free when the timer fires.
--
commit ff64adc37d4f911609320ae5c3255e7d89218807
Author: Navon John Lukose <navonjohnlukose@gmail.com>
wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: don't infer CSME presence from a failed read
This commit modifies iwl_pcie_check_me_status() to avoid inferring CSME
presence from hardware error values on failed reads. It skips evaluating
these bad values so the state can be preserved and rechecked later.
Fixes: 41fff83fe6cd ("wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: check for WiAMT/CSME presence")
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c
> index 28b276c659526..c6a771e899041 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4212,15 +4213,19 @@ static void iwl_pcie_check_me_status(struct iwl_trans *trans)
> return;
>
> val = iwl_read_prph(trans, CNVI_SCU_REG_FOR_ECO_1);
> - if (val & CNVI_SCU_REG_FOR_ECO_1_WIAMT_KNOWN) {
> + /* iwl_read_prph() returns 0x5a5a5a5a if it never reached the NIC, and
> + * that value has WIAMT_KNOWN set and WIAMT_PRESENT clear
> + */
> + if (val != ~0U && !iwl_trans_is_hw_error_value(val) &&
> + (val & CNVI_SCU_REG_FOR_ECO_1_WIAMT_KNOWN)) {
> trans_pcie->me_present =
> !!(val & CNVI_SCU_REG_FOR_ECO_1_WIAMT_PRESENT);
> return;
> }
>
> val = iwl_read32(trans, CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG);
> - if (val & (CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG_ME_OWN |
> - CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG_IAMT_UP)) {
> + if (val != ~0U && (val & (CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG_ME_OWN |
> + CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG_IAMT_UP))) {
> trans_pcie->me_present = 1;
> return;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this change make a use-after-free
consistently triggerable on a dead NIC?
Since this patch bypasses the early returns for hardware error values,
iwl_pcie_check_me_status() will now fall through and unconditionally schedule
the delayed work:
schedule_delayed_work(&trans_pcie->me_recheck_wk, HZ);
If the probe subsequently fails (for instance, if iwl_drv_start() fails
against the unresponsive hardware), the probe function goes to the
out_free_trans error path:
iwl_pci_gen1_2_probe() {
...
out_free_trans:
iwl_trans_pcie_free(iwl_trans);
return ret;
}
But iwl_trans_pcie_free() doesn't appear to call cancel_delayed_work_sync()
for me_recheck_wk before freeing the trans structure.
If the delayed work timer fires a second later, won't it dereference the
freed trans_pcie pointer?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831130332.323549-1-navonjohnlukose@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 13:03 [PATCH wireless v2 0/3] wifi: iwlwifi: recover a device that lost power in D3cold Navon John Lukose
2026-08-31 13:03 ` [PATCH wireless v2 1/3] wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: don't infer CSME presence from a failed read Navon John Lukose
2026-08-31 13:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 15:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-01 16:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-01 17:02 ` Johannes Berg
2026-08-31 13:03 ` [PATCH wireless v2 2/3] wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: deselect the product reset mode at probe Navon John Lukose
2026-08-31 13:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 13:03 ` [PATCH wireless v2 3/3] wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: recover a device that lost power in D3cold Navon John Lukose
2026-08-31 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 17:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831131514.3A1FF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=navonjohnlukose@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox