Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mukesh R <mrathor@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
	hpa@zytor.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
	wei.liu@kernel.org, mhklinux@outlook.com, muislam@microsoft.com,
	namjain@linux.microsoft.com, magnuskulke@linux.microsoft.com,
	anbelski@linux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, decui@microsoft.com,
	longli@microsoft.com, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com,
	Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@vates.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] mshv: Introduce basic mshv bridge device for VFIO to build upon
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:34:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903113459.00006639@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903144236.GK4157646@nvidia.com>

Hi Jason,

On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:42:36 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 11:19:05AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> 
> > If we do want to support this kvm-vfio bridge semantics beyond kvm,
> > maybe this should be abstracted as a generic VFIO "hypervisor
> > partition" association, with hypervisor-specific get/put callbacks,
> > rather than adding an MSHV-only copy of the KVM hook.
> > +Alex  
> 
> I don't like this patch at all.
> 
> I think we should try to harmonize all these sort of "external" cases
> as best we can. mshv, confidential compute, xen, etc all have a very
> similar shape.
> 
> I am discussing here with Aneesh an approach to use the viommu almost
> exclusively for this.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260902235609.GG2890729@ziepe.ca/
> 
> Can you imagine a way to do that for your stuff?
> 
> In that case I imagine the iommufd vdevice create is what attaches the
> vfio device to the partition, not a seperate ioctl over in some other
> driver. When the viommu is created it knows what partition it is
> affiliated with because it took in a FD that describes that partition.
Yes, viommu/vdevice model maps well in my POC/RFC(WIP) without new
ioctls.

vdevice is attached to the vm partition via viommu (holds vm_fd). i.e.
	struct iommu_vdevice_alloc alloc = {
		.size = sizeof(alloc),
		.viommu_id = viommu_id,
		.dev_id = dev_id,
		.virt_id = vm_device_id, //vmm assigned
	};
	int rc;

	rc = do_ioctl(iommufd, IOMMU_VDEVICE_ALLOC, &alloc,
		      "IOMMU_VDEVICE_ALLOC");

In our case, we don't need a vdevice_init op since all we need is the
virt_id, hyperv iommu driver will retrieved the vmm assigned logical
device ID (virt_id) by existing API:

static int hyperv_iommu_external_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
					   struct device *dev,
					   struct iommu_domain *old)
{
	ret = iommufd_viommu_get_vdev_id(external_domain->viommu, dev,
					 &vdev_id);

Then use vdev_id for the hypercall to attach external domain.

I currently have a new IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_MSHV with:

/**
 * struct iommu_viommu_mshv - Microsoft Hypervisor virtual IOMMU
 *                            (IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_MSHV)
 * @vm_fd: MSHV partition file descriptor
 * @flags: Must be 0
 * @__reserved: Must be 0
 */
struct iommu_viommu_mshv {
	__s32 vm_fd;
	__u32 flags;
	__aligned_u64 __reserved;
};

That is MSHV-specific only because the fd validation and partition-ID
lookup are MSHV-specific today. I think this could be generalized later
into a common "external/hypervisor partition" vIOMMU type with
driver-specific fd validation/get/put semantics.

Thanks,

Jacob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 22:34 [PATCH v5 0/9] PCI passthru on Hyper-V Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] mshv: Provide a way to get partition ID if running in a VMM process Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] mshv: Add declarations and definitions for VFIO-MSHV bridge device Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] mshv: Introduce basic mshv bridge device for VFIO to build upon Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 18:19   ` Jacob Pan
2026-09-03 14:42     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-03 16:13       ` Wei Liu
2026-09-03 17:40         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-03 18:46           ` Jacob Pan
2026-09-04  0:10             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-03 18:34       ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] mshv: Add ioctl support for MSHV-VFIO bridge device Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] mshv: Import data structs around device passthru from hyperv headers Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] PCI: hv: Export hv_build_devid_type_pci() and change return type Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 22:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] x86/hyperv: Implement Hyper-V virtual IOMMU Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 12:48   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-18 21:01     ` Jacob Pan
2026-08-18 23:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-18 23:39     ` Mukesh R
2026-08-18 23:48       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-19  0:13         ` Mukesh R
2026-08-19 12:46           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-19 16:29             ` Jacob Pan
2026-08-19 16:33               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] mshv: Populate mmio mappings for PCI passthru Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] mshv: Disable movable regions upfront if device passthru Mukesh R
2026-07-31 22:57   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260903113459.00006639@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=anbelski@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnuskulke@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mrathor@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=muislam@microsoft.com \
    --cc=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=teddy.astie@vates.tech \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox