Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fahmy Hassan <fahmymohammed@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, fahmymohammed@gmail.com, kees@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI: cpqphp: Check pci_hp_add_bridge() return value
Date: Tue,  8 Sep 2026 20:17:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909021753.611668-1-fahmymohammed@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909014143.GA123333@bhelgaas>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 07:41 PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> The patch doesn't seem to remove the TODO.

Sorry about that -- the patch you received was generated before I
amended the commit to actually include the TODO removal; the archived
patch file was stale on my end, not something dropped from the actual
fix. Fixed in v2.

> There are four other drivers that call pci_hp_add_bridge(), and none
> of them check the return value either.  We should leave it alone or
> fix them all, so the review effort can be applied to all of them at
> once.

Makes sense. I've turned this into a v2 series that checks the return
value the same way in cpqphp, cpcihp, ibmphp, pciehp, and shpchp,
logging via each driver's existing error macro.

One more correction, from an automated review I also got on v1: my
commit message said the failure "goes completely unreported", which
overstated it -- pci_hp_add_bridge() already logs the "no bus number
available" case via pci_err(). It only stays silent for the other
failure path (subordinate bus not created after scanning). Since the
function returns a bare -1 for either case, the caller can't tell
which one happened, so the new per-driver log will occasionally
overlap with that existing message for the bus-number case
specifically. I've reworded the v2 commit messages to describe this
accurately instead.

v2 coming shortly.

Thanks,
Fahmy

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  1:30 [PATCH v1] PCI: cpqphp: Check pci_hp_add_bridge() return value Fahmy Hassan
2026-09-09  1:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-09  2:17   ` Fahmy Hassan [this message]
2026-09-09  2:22   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: hotplug: " Fahmy Hassan
2026-09-09  2:22     ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: cpqphp: " Fahmy Hassan
2026-09-09  2:22     ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: cpcihp: " Fahmy Hassan
2026-09-09  2:22     ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: ibmphp: " Fahmy Hassan
2026-09-09  2:22     ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: pciehp: " Fahmy Hassan
2026-09-09  6:42       ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-09  2:22     ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI: shpchp: " Fahmy Hassan
2026-09-09  1:42 ` [PATCH v1] PCI: cpqphp: " sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909021753.611668-1-fahmymohammed@gmail.com \
    --to=fahmymohammed@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox