From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: alistair23@gmail.com
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, gary@garyguo.net, ojeda@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_digests
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 01:45:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928014506.5C19E1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928011123.450800-19-alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] rspdm: GET_DIGESTS buffer truncation and invalid length breaks SPDM 1.3+ authentication
--
commit 302ede91b9559c0e7a23017a89574c6ce5ec60eb
Author: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_digests
Support the get_digests Spdm command.
> diff --git a/lib/rspdm/state.rs b/lib/rspdm/state.rs
> index 51055ea521d72..502d99eb13a66 100644
> --- a/lib/rspdm/state.rs
> +++ b/lib/rspdm/state.rs
> [ ... ]
> @@ -600,4 +618,40 @@ pub(crate) fn negotiate_algs(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error> {
>
> Ok(())
> }
> +
> + pub(crate) fn get_digests(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error> {
> + let mut request = GetDigestsReq::default();
> + request.header.version = self.version;
> +
> + let rsp_sz = core::mem::size_of::<SpdmHeader>() + SPDM_SLOTS * self.hash_len;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: High]
Does this allocation provide enough capacity for Spdm 1.3+ payloads?
For Spdm 1.3+, the response appends 4 bytes per provisioned slot for items
like KeyPairID, CertificateInfo, and KeyUsageMask.
If the device utilizes multiple slots, it seems the extra bytes will exceed
this capacity, causing transport errors when interacting with valid Spdm 1.3
or 1.4 responder devices.
> +
> + let mut request_buf = request.to_bytes()?;
> +
> + let mut response_vec: KVec<u8> = KVec::from_elem(0u8, rsp_sz, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> [ ... ]
> diff --git a/lib/rspdm/validator.rs b/lib/rspdm/validator.rs
> index 58f6a3d436a8b..c058dde314401 100644
> --- a/lib/rspdm/validator.rs
> +++ b/lib/rspdm/validator.rs
> [ ... ]
> @@ -697,3 +700,97 @@ fn validate(unvalidated: &[u8], context: &'c SpdmState<'c>) -> Result<Self, Self
> [ ... ]
> + if context.version >= SPDM_VER_13 && (header.param2 & !header.param1 != 0) {
> + pr_err!("Malformed digests response\n");
> + return Err(EPROTO);
> + }
> +
> + Ok(GetDigestsRsp {
> + header,
> + digests,
> + length: offset,
^^^^^^
[Severity: High]
Does returning only the offset for the length drop the Spdm 1.3+ suffix
fields?
In GetDigestsRsp::validate, this length only covers the header and hashes,
which appears to explicitly ignore the Spdm 1.3+ suffix fields completely.
Since this truncated response length is appended to the host transcript,
could this silently corrupt the transcript computation and cause the challenge
authentication signature verification to fail?
> + })
> + }
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928011123.450800-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com?part=18
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 1:11 [PATCH v4 00/22] lib: Rust implementation of SPDM alistair23
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] virt: coco: change tsm_register() to use a const struct alistair23
2026-09-28 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] rust: transmute: add `cast_slice[_mut]` functions alistair23
2026-09-28 1:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] rust: create basic untrusted data API alistair23
2026-09-28 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] rust: validate: add `Validate` trait alistair23
2026-09-28 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 05/22] X.509: Make certificate parser public alistair23
2026-09-28 1:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] X.509: Parse Subject Alternative Name in certificates alistair23
2026-09-28 1:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] X.509: Move certificate length retrieval into new helper alistair23
2026-09-28 1:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] rust: add bindings for hash.h alistair23
2026-09-28 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] rust: error: impl From<FromBytesWithNulError> for Kernel Error alistair23
2026-09-28 1:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] lib: rspdm: Initial commit of Rust SPDM alistair23
2026-09-28 1:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] PCI/TSM: Rename pf0 to host alistair23
2026-09-28 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] PCI/TSM: Support connecting to PCIe CMA devices alistair23
2026-09-28 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] PCI/CMA: Add a PCI TSM CMA driver using SPDM alistair23
2026-09-28 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] PCI/CMA: Validate Subject Alternative Name in certificates alistair23
2026-09-28 1:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_version alistair23
2026-09-28 1:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_capabilities alistair23
2026-09-28 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 17/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM negotiate_algorithms alistair23
2026-09-28 1:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_digests alistair23
2026-09-28 1:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_certificate alistair23
2026-09-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM certificate validation alistair23
2026-09-28 1:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] rust: allow extracting the buffer from a CString alistair23
2026-09-28 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM challenge alistair23
2026-09-28 1:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 1:43 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_certificate sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260928014506.5C19E1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox