From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2.1 3/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC evaluation out of acpi_run_osc()
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:14:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22963770.EfDdHjke4D@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2413407.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Split a function for evaluating _OSC called acpi_eval_osc() out of
acpi_run_osc() to facilitate subsequent changes and add some more
parameters sanity checks to the latter.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
v1 -> v2.1:
* Fix typo in the changelog (Jonathan).
* Use at_least to enforce compiler checking of in_params[] size instead of
using "static" directly (Jonathan).
---
drivers/acpi/bus.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -196,52 +196,67 @@ static void acpi_dump_osc_data(acpi_hand
OSC_INVALID_REVISION_ERROR | \
OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR)
-acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
+static int acpi_eval_osc(acpi_handle handle, guid_t *guid, int rev,
+ struct acpi_buffer *cap,
+ union acpi_object in_params[at_least 4],
+ struct acpi_buffer *output)
{
- u32 errors, *capbuf = context->cap.pointer;
- acpi_status status;
struct acpi_object_list input;
- union acpi_object in_params[4];
union acpi_object *out_obj;
- guid_t guid;
- struct acpi_buffer output = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
-
- if (!context)
- return AE_ERROR;
- if (guid_parse(context->uuid_str, &guid))
- return AE_ERROR;
- context->ret.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER;
- context->ret.pointer = NULL;
+ acpi_status status;
- /* Setting up input parameters */
- input.count = 4;
+ in_params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+ in_params[0].buffer.length = sizeof(*guid);
+ in_params[0].buffer.pointer = (u8 *)guid;
+ in_params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ in_params[1].integer.value = rev;
+ in_params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ in_params[2].integer.value = cap->length / sizeof(u32);
+ in_params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+ in_params[3].buffer.length = cap->length;
+ in_params[3].buffer.pointer = cap->pointer;
input.pointer = in_params;
- in_params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
- in_params[0].buffer.length = 16;
- in_params[0].buffer.pointer = (u8 *)&guid;
- in_params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
- in_params[1].integer.value = context->rev;
- in_params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
- in_params[2].integer.value = context->cap.length/sizeof(u32);
- in_params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
- in_params[3].buffer.length = context->cap.length;
- in_params[3].buffer.pointer = context->cap.pointer;
-
- status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &output);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- return status;
+ input.count = 4;
- if (!output.length)
- return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
+ output->length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER;
+ output->pointer = NULL;
- out_obj = output.pointer;
- if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER
- || out_obj->buffer.length != context->cap.length) {
- acpi_dump_osc_data(handle, &guid, context->rev, &context->cap);
- acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: evaluation returned wrong type");
- status = AE_TYPE;
- goto out_kfree;
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, output);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !output->length)
+ return -ENODATA;
+
+ out_obj = output->pointer;
+ if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ||
+ out_obj->buffer.length != cap->length) {
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Invalid _OSC return buffer\n");
+ acpi_dump_osc_data(handle, guid, rev, cap);
+ ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
+ return -ENODATA;
}
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
+{
+ u32 errors, *capbuf = context->cap.pointer;
+ union acpi_object in_params[4], *out_obj;
+ struct acpi_buffer output;
+ acpi_status status = AE_OK;
+ guid_t guid;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!context || !context->cap.pointer ||
+ context->cap.length < 2 * sizeof(32) ||
+ guid_parse(context->uuid_str, &guid))
+ return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+ ret = acpi_eval_osc(handle, &guid, context->rev, &context->cap,
+ in_params, &output);
+ if (ret)
+ return AE_ERROR;
+
+ out_obj = output.pointer;
/* Only take defined error bits into account. */
errors = *((u32 *)out_obj->buffer.pointer) & OSC_ERROR_MASK;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-22 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-22 18:58 [PATCH v2.1 0/8] ACPI: bus: Rework of the \_SB._OSC handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:05 ` [PATCH v2.1 1/8] ACPI: bus: Fix handling of _OSC errors in acpi_run_osc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-23 16:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:11 ` [PATCH v2.1 2/8] ACPI: bus: Rework printing debug messages on _OSC errors Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-12-23 11:18 ` [PATCH v2.1 3/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC evaluation out of acpi_run_osc() Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH v2.1 4/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC error processing " Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH v2.1 5/8] ACPI: bus: Rename label and use ACPI_FREE() in acpi_run_osc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:21 ` [PATCH v2.1 6/8] ACPI: bus: Rework the handling of \_SB._OSC platform features Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:23 ` [PATCH v2.1 7/8] ACPI: bus: Adjust feature mask creation for \_SB._OSC Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:26 ` [PATCH v2.1 8/8] ACPI: bus: Rework the handling of \_SB._OSC USB4 features Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22963770.EfDdHjke4D@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox