Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2.1 3/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC evaluation out of acpi_run_osc()
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:14:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22963770.EfDdHjke4D@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2413407.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Split a function for evaluating _OSC called acpi_eval_osc() out of
acpi_run_osc() to facilitate subsequent changes and add some more
parameters sanity checks to the latter.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

v1 -> v2.1:
   * Fix typo in the changelog (Jonathan).
   * Use at_least to enforce compiler checking of in_params[] size instead of
     using "static" directly (Jonathan).

---
 drivers/acpi/bus.c |   91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -196,52 +196,67 @@ static void acpi_dump_osc_data(acpi_hand
 			 OSC_INVALID_REVISION_ERROR | \
 			 OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR)
 
-acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
+static int acpi_eval_osc(acpi_handle handle, guid_t *guid, int rev,
+			 struct acpi_buffer *cap,
+			 union acpi_object in_params[at_least 4],
+			 struct acpi_buffer *output)
 {
-	u32 errors, *capbuf = context->cap.pointer;
-	acpi_status status;
 	struct acpi_object_list input;
-	union acpi_object in_params[4];
 	union acpi_object *out_obj;
-	guid_t guid;
-	struct acpi_buffer output = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
-
-	if (!context)
-		return AE_ERROR;
-	if (guid_parse(context->uuid_str, &guid))
-		return AE_ERROR;
-	context->ret.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER;
-	context->ret.pointer = NULL;
+	acpi_status status;
 
-	/* Setting up input parameters */
-	input.count = 4;
+	in_params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+	in_params[0].buffer.length = sizeof(*guid);
+	in_params[0].buffer.pointer = (u8 *)guid;
+	in_params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	in_params[1].integer.value = rev;
+	in_params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	in_params[2].integer.value = cap->length / sizeof(u32);
+	in_params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+	in_params[3].buffer.length = cap->length;
+	in_params[3].buffer.pointer = cap->pointer;
 	input.pointer = in_params;
-	in_params[0].type 		= ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
-	in_params[0].buffer.length 	= 16;
-	in_params[0].buffer.pointer	= (u8 *)&guid;
-	in_params[1].type 		= ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-	in_params[1].integer.value 	= context->rev;
-	in_params[2].type 		= ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-	in_params[2].integer.value	= context->cap.length/sizeof(u32);
-	in_params[3].type		= ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
-	in_params[3].buffer.length 	= context->cap.length;
-	in_params[3].buffer.pointer 	= context->cap.pointer;
-
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &output);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-		return status;
+	input.count = 4;
 
-	if (!output.length)
-		return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
+	output->length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER;
+	output->pointer = NULL;
 
-	out_obj = output.pointer;
-	if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER
-		|| out_obj->buffer.length != context->cap.length) {
-		acpi_dump_osc_data(handle, &guid, context->rev, &context->cap);
-		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: evaluation returned wrong type");
-		status = AE_TYPE;
-		goto out_kfree;
+	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, output);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !output->length)
+		return -ENODATA;
+
+	out_obj = output->pointer;
+	if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ||
+	    out_obj->buffer.length != cap->length) {
+		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Invalid _OSC return buffer\n");
+		acpi_dump_osc_data(handle, guid, rev, cap);
+		ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
+		return -ENODATA;
 	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
+{
+	u32 errors, *capbuf = context->cap.pointer;
+	union acpi_object in_params[4], *out_obj;
+	struct acpi_buffer output;
+	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
+	guid_t guid;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!context || !context->cap.pointer ||
+	    context->cap.length < 2 * sizeof(32) ||
+	    guid_parse(context->uuid_str, &guid))
+		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+	ret = acpi_eval_osc(handle, &guid, context->rev, &context->cap,
+			    in_params, &output);
+	if (ret)
+		return AE_ERROR;
+
+	out_obj = output.pointer;
 	/* Only take defined error bits into account. */
 	errors = *((u32 *)out_obj->buffer.pointer) & OSC_ERROR_MASK;
 	/*




  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-22 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-22 18:58 [PATCH v2.1 0/8] ACPI: bus: Rework of the \_SB._OSC handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:05 ` [PATCH v2.1 1/8] ACPI: bus: Fix handling of _OSC errors in acpi_run_osc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-23 16:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:11 ` [PATCH v2.1 2/8] ACPI: bus: Rework printing debug messages on _OSC errors Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-12-23 11:18   ` [PATCH v2.1 3/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC evaluation out of acpi_run_osc() Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH v2.1 4/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC error processing " Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH v2.1 5/8] ACPI: bus: Rename label and use ACPI_FREE() in acpi_run_osc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:21 ` [PATCH v2.1 6/8] ACPI: bus: Rework the handling of \_SB._OSC platform features Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:23 ` [PATCH v2.1 7/8] ACPI: bus: Adjust feature mask creation for \_SB._OSC Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:26 ` [PATCH v2.1 8/8] ACPI: bus: Rework the handling of \_SB._OSC USB4 features Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22963770.EfDdHjke4D@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox