Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2.1 4/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC error processing out of acpi_run_osc()
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:17:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6135328.MhkbZ0Pkbq@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2413407.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Split a function for processing _OSC errors called acpi_osc_error_check()
out of acpi_run_osc() to facilitate subsequent changes.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
---

v1 -> v2.1:
   * Rebase on the modified first patch.
   * Fix typo in the changelog (Jonathan).
   * Expand the comment regarding ignoring OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR
     when OSC_QUERY_DWORD is set (Jonathan).
   * Add R-by from Jonathan.

---
 drivers/acpi/bus.c |   95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -237,13 +237,60 @@ static int acpi_eval_osc(acpi_handle han
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool acpi_osc_error_check(acpi_handle handle, guid_t *guid, int rev,
+				 struct acpi_buffer *cap, u32 *retbuf)
+{
+	/* Only take defined error bits into account. */
+	u32 errors = retbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] & OSC_ERROR_MASK;
+	u32 *capbuf = cap->pointer;
+	bool fail;
+
+	/*
+	 * If OSC_QUERY_ENABLE is set, ignore the "capabilities masked"
+	 * bit because it merely means that some features have not been
+	 * acknowledged which is not unexpected.
+	 */
+	if (capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] & OSC_QUERY_ENABLE)
+		errors &= ~OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR;
+
+	if (!errors)
+		return false;
+
+	acpi_dump_osc_data(handle, guid, rev, cap);
+	/*
+	 * As a rule, fail only if OSC_QUERY_ENABLE is set because otherwise the
+	 * acknowledged features need to be controlled.
+	 */
+	fail = !!(capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] & OSC_QUERY_ENABLE);
+
+	if (errors & OSC_REQUEST_ERROR)
+		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: request failed\n");
+
+	if (errors & OSC_INVALID_UUID_ERROR) {
+		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: invalid UUID\n");
+		/*
+		 * Always fail if this bit is set because it means that the
+		 * request could not be processed.
+		 */
+		fail = true;
+	}
+
+	if (errors & OSC_INVALID_REVISION_ERROR)
+		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: invalid revision\n");
+
+	if (errors & OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR)
+		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: capability bits masked\n");
+
+	return fail;
+}
+
 acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
 {
-	u32 errors, *capbuf = context->cap.pointer;
 	union acpi_object in_params[4], *out_obj;
 	struct acpi_buffer output;
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	guid_t guid;
+	u32 *retbuf;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!context || !context->cap.pointer ||
@@ -257,51 +304,15 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle han
 		return AE_ERROR;
 
 	out_obj = output.pointer;
-	/* Only take defined error bits into account. */
-	errors = *((u32 *)out_obj->buffer.pointer) & OSC_ERROR_MASK;
-	/*
-	 * If OSC_QUERY_ENABLE is set, ignore the "capabilities masked"
-	 * bit because it merely means that some features have not been
-	 * acknowledged which is not unexpected.
-	 */
-	if (capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] & OSC_QUERY_ENABLE)
-		errors &= ~OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR;
+	retbuf = (u32 *)out_obj->buffer.pointer;
 
-	if (errors) {
-		/*
-		 * As a rule, fail only if OSC_QUERY_ENABLE is set because
-		 * otherwise the acknowledged features need to be controlled.
-		 */
-		bool fail = !!(capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] & OSC_QUERY_ENABLE);
-
-		acpi_dump_osc_data(handle, &guid, context->rev, &context->cap);
-		if (errors & OSC_INVALID_UUID_ERROR) {
-			acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: invalid UUID");
-			/*
-			 * Always fail if this bit is set because it means that
-			 * the request could not be processed.
-			 */
-			fail = true;
-			goto out_kfree;
-		}
-		if (errors & OSC_REQUEST_ERROR)
-			acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: request failed");
-
-		if (errors & OSC_INVALID_REVISION_ERROR)
-			acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: invalid revision");
-
-		if (errors & OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR)
-			acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_OSC: capability bits masked");
-
-		if (fail) {
-			status = AE_ERROR;
-			goto out_kfree;
-		}
+	if (acpi_osc_error_check(handle, &guid, context->rev, &context->cap, retbuf)) {
+		status = AE_ERROR;
+		goto out_kfree;
 	}
 
 	context->ret.length = out_obj->buffer.length;
-	context->ret.pointer = kmemdup(out_obj->buffer.pointer,
-				       context->ret.length, GFP_KERNEL);
+	context->ret.pointer = kmemdup(retbuf, context->ret.length, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!context->ret.pointer) {
 		status =  AE_NO_MEMORY;
 		goto out_kfree;




  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-22 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-22 18:58 [PATCH v2.1 0/8] ACPI: bus: Rework of the \_SB._OSC handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:05 ` [PATCH v2.1 1/8] ACPI: bus: Fix handling of _OSC errors in acpi_run_osc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-23 16:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:11 ` [PATCH v2.1 2/8] ACPI: bus: Rework printing debug messages on _OSC errors Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:14 ` [PATCH v2.1 3/8] ACPI: bus: Split _OSC evaluation out of acpi_run_osc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:18   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH v2.1 5/8] ACPI: bus: Rename label and use ACPI_FREE() in acpi_run_osc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-22 19:21 ` [PATCH v2.1 6/8] ACPI: bus: Rework the handling of \_SB._OSC platform features Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:23 ` [PATCH v2.1 7/8] ACPI: bus: Adjust feature mask creation for \_SB._OSC Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-23 11:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 19:26 ` [PATCH v2.1 8/8] ACPI: bus: Rework the handling of \_SB._OSC USB4 features Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6135328.MhkbZ0Pkbq@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox