From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, bwawrzyn@cisco.com, cassel@kernel.org,
wojciech.jasko-EXT@continental-corporation.com, a-verma1@ti.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rockswang7@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [v3] PCI: cadence: Fix sending message with data or without data
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 23:48:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d3d8772-08ba-4e5a-bf1f-71821cf056e7@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214153103.4cjlawksw4xobc2l@thinkpad>
On 2025/2/14 23:31, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:28:11PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> Sorry Mani, I shouldn't have spread this SOC bug. This is a bug in RTL
>> design, the WSTRB signal of AXI bus is not connected correctly, so the first
>> generation SOC cannot send message, because we mainly use RC mode, and we
>> cannot send PME_Turn_OFF, that is, our SOC does not support L2. I have no
>> choice about this, I entered the company relatively late, and our SOC has
>> already TO.
>
> Ok. Just to clear my head, this patch is needed irrespective of the hw issue,
> right? And with or without this patch, first revision hw cannot send any MSG
> TLPs?
Yes, that was a problem with our own SOC design, the Cadence RTL bug.
> If so, it is fine. But is there a way we could detect those first generation IPs
> and flag it to users about broken MSG TLP support? Atleast, that would make the
> users aware of broken hw.
I don't know how to do it, but here are the questions that were actually
tested.
>>
>> This patch is to solve the Cadence common code bug, and does not conform to
>> Cadence documentation.
>
> you mean 'does'?
>
What I mean is that common code bit16=1 is to send a message without
data, while Cadence's development document says that bit16=0 is to send
a message without data. This is not consistent with the documentation
description, and the final verification results, the development
documentation described is correct.
Best regards
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 10:39 [v3] PCI: cadence: Fix sending message with data or without data Hans Zhang
2025-02-14 7:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 8:23 ` Hans Zhang
2025-02-14 13:21 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 14:28 ` Hans Zhang
2025-02-14 15:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 15:48 ` Hans Zhang [this message]
2025-02-14 15:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 16:53 ` Hans Zhang
2025-02-14 16:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 16:49 ` Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d3d8772-08ba-4e5a-bf1f-71821cf056e7@163.com \
--to=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=a-verma1@ti.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwawrzyn@cisco.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rockswang7@gmail.com \
--cc=wojciech.jasko-EXT@continental-corporation.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox