From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
dave@stgolabs.net, bhelgaas@google.com, lukas@wunner.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: Create new reset method to force SBR for CXL
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:21:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d4a14a8-7720-4ecc-9099-1bb94b3e7013@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403160911.000016c0@Huawei.com>
On 4/3/24 8:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 16:45:31 -0700
> Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> CXL spec r3.1 8.1.5.2
>> By default Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) is masked for CXL ports. Introduce a
>> new PCI reset method "cxl_bus" to force SBR on CXL ports by setting
>> the unmask SBR bit in the CXL DVSEC port control register before performing
>> the bus reset and restore the original value of the bit post reset. The
>> new reset method allows the user to intentionally perform SBR on a CXL
>> device without needing to set the "Unmask SBR" bit via a user tool.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> A few trivial things inline. Otherwise looks fine.
>
> FWIW
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> - move cxl_port_dvsec() to previous patch. (Dan)
>> - add pci_cfg_access_lock() for the bridge. (Dan)
>> - Change cxl_bus_force method to cxl_bus. (Dan)
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/pci.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index 00eddb451102..3989c8888813 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -4982,6 +4982,49 @@ static int pci_reset_bus_function(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe)
>> return pci_parent_bus_reset(dev, probe);
>> }
>>
>> +static int cxl_reset_bus_function(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *bridge;
>> + int dvsec;
>
> Lukas' comment on previous applies to this as well.
ok
>
>> + int rc;
>> + u16 reg, val;
>
> Maybe combine lines as appropriate.
ok
>
>> +
>> + bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
>> + if (!bridge)
>> + return -ENOTTY;
>> +
>> + dvsec = cxl_port_dvsec(bridge);
>> + if (!dvsec)
>> + return -ENOTTY;
>> +
>> + if (probe)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + pci_cfg_access_lock(bridge);
>> + rc = pci_read_config_word(bridge, dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT_CTL, ®);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + rc = -ENOTTY;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!(reg & PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT_CTL_UNMASK_SBR)) {
>> + val = reg | PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT_CTL_UNMASK_SBR;
>> + pci_write_config_word(bridge, dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT_CTL,
>> + val);
>> + } else {
>> + val = reg;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc = pci_reset_bus_function(dev, probe);
>> +
>> + if (reg != val)
>> + pci_write_config_word(bridge, dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT_CTL, reg);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + pci_cfg_access_unlock(bridge);
>
> Maybe a guard() use case to allow early returns in error paths?
I'm not seeing a good way to do it. pci_cfg_access_lock/unlock() isn't like your typical lock/unlock. It locks, changes some pci_dev internal stuff, and then unlocks in both functions. The pci_lock isn't being held after lock() call.
>
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> void pci_dev_lock(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> /* block PM suspend, driver probe, etc. */
>> @@ -5066,6 +5109,7 @@ static const struct pci_reset_fn_method pci_reset_fn_methods[] = {
>> { pci_af_flr, .name = "af_flr" },
>> { pci_pm_reset, .name = "pm" },
>> { pci_reset_bus_function, .name = "bus" },
>> + { cxl_reset_bus_function, .name = "cxl_bus" },
>> };
>>
>> static ssize_t reset_method_show(struct device *dev,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 16493426a04f..235f37715a43 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
>> PCI_STATUS_PARITY)
>>
>> /* Number of reset methods used in pci_reset_fn_methods array in pci.c */
>> -#define PCI_NUM_RESET_METHODS 7
>> +#define PCI_NUM_RESET_METHODS 8
>>
>> #define PCI_RESET_PROBE true
>> #define PCI_RESET_DO_RESET false
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-02 23:45 [PATCH 0/4 v3] PCI: Add Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) support for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/cxl: Move PCI CXL vendor Id to a common location from CXL subsystem Dave Jiang
2024-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: Add check for CXL Secondary Bus Reset Dave Jiang
2024-04-03 8:26 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-04-04 0:19 ` Dave Jiang
2024-04-03 15:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: Create new reset method to force SBR for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-04-03 15:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-04 0:21 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2024-04-04 13:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-04 14:42 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] cxl: Add post reset warning if reset is detected as Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) Dave Jiang
2024-04-03 15:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-03 16:27 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-04 13:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-04 8:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-04-04 13:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d4a14a8-7720-4ecc-9099-1bb94b3e7013@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox