Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Schaller <michael@5challer.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, kai.heng.feng@canonical.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, macro@orcam.me.uk,
	ajayagarwal@google.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
	michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com, johan+linaro@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] [PCI/ASPM] [ASUS PN51] Reboot on resume attempt (bisect done; commit found)
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:50:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5598b690-12da-4237-b2bf-c9c691c4647c@5challer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240101221554.GA1693060@bhelgaas>


On 01.01.24 23:15, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 07:57:40PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote:
>> On 01.01.24 19:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 07:29:02PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote:
>>> ...
> 
>>> So unless somebody has a counter-argument, I plan to queue a revert of
>>> 08d0cc5f3426 ("PCI/ASPM: Remove pcie_aspm_pm_state_change()") for
>>> v6.7.
>>
>> If it helps I could also try if a partial revert of 08d0cc5f3426 would be
>> sufficient. This might also narrow down the issue and give more insight
>> where the issue originates from.
> 
> We're so close to the v6.7 final release that I doubt we can figure
> out the problem and test a fix before v6.7.  I'm sure Kai-Heng would
> appreciate any additional data, but I don't think it's urgent at this
> point.
> 
> Bjorn

We're indeed close to the final v6.7 release, which in turn means that a 
last minute revert of a 16 month old commit might cause even more 
regressions as there have been quite a few ASPM changes afterwards and 
there won't be much testing anymore before the final release.

Furthermore, given the age of the commit and that it has been backported 
to kernel 5.15, the question is also if the revert would be backported 
to the affected LTS kernels?

If this regression risk is acceptable then I'm all for reverting the 
commit now and then working on a fix.

Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-02 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-25 18:29 [Regression] [PCI/ASPM] [ASUS PN51] Reboot on resume attempt (bisect done; commit found) Michael Schaller
2023-12-29  0:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-12-29 10:31   ` Michael Schaller
2024-01-01 18:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-01 18:57   ` Michael Schaller
2024-01-01 22:15     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-02 13:50       ` Michael Schaller [this message]
2024-01-03  8:21         ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-01-05  3:25     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-01-05 11:18       ` Michael Schaller
2024-01-05 15:51         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-10  3:43           ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-01-10 12:39             ` Michael Schaller
2024-03-07  6:51               ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-03-08 15:49                 ` michael
2024-03-08 16:40                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-03 15:41   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-05  3:14     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-01-05 10:29       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-02 23:25 ` [PATCH] Revert "PCI/ASPM: Remove pcie_aspm_pm_state_change()" Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-02 23:33   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-01-03  0:12     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-08  8:39   ` Johan Hovold
2024-01-22 10:53     ` PCI/ASPM locking regression in 6.7-final (was: Re: [PATCH] Revert "PCI/ASPM: Remove pcie_aspm_pm_state_change()") Johan Hovold
2024-01-22 18:26       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-23 17:25         ` Johan Hovold
2024-01-23 22:36           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-24  8:16             ` Johan Hovold
2024-01-30 10:07               ` Johan Hovold
2024-02-09 12:45       ` PCI/ASPM locking regression in 6.7-final Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5598b690-12da-4237-b2bf-c9c691c4647c@5challer.de \
    --to=michael@5challer.de \
    --cc=ajayagarwal@google.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox