From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@nvidia.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, "AceLan Kao" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Mark Pearson" <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
"Denis Benato" <benato.denis96@gmail.com>,
"Merthan Karakaş" <m3rthn.k@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 12:32:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68fdf9e1-8f27-46a6-a8a2-11ffb84726c9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jXYgLsMHyD7EQwAf47=HnU7MCpC7+Th7nnonqV-q2qJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/6/2025 10:50 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 6:19 AM Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@nvidia.com>
>>
>> Some laptops wake up after poweroff when HP Thunderbolt Dock G4 is
>> connected.
>>
>> The following error message can be found during shutdown:
>> pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:09:04.0
>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: device [8086:0b26] error status/mask=00000080/00002000
>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: [ 7] BadDLLP
>>
>> Calling aer_remove() during shutdown can quiesce the error message,
>> however the spurious wakeup still happens.
>>
>> The issue won't happen if the device is in D3 before system shutdown, so
>> putting device to low power state before shutdown to solve the issue.
>>
>> ACPI Spec 6.5, "7.4.2.5 System \_S4 State" says "Devices states are
>> compatible with the current Power Resource states. In other words, all
>> devices are in the D3 state when the system state is S4."
>>
>> The following "7.4.2.6 System \_S5 State (Soft Off)" states "The S5
>> state is similar to the S4 state except that OSPM does not save any
>> context." so it's safe to assume devices should be at D3 for S5.
>
> That's fine as long as you assume that ->shutdown() is only used for
> implementing ACPI S5, but it is not.
I suppose you're meaning things like:
kernel_restart_prepare()
->device_shutdown()
->->each device's shutdown() CB
->->each driver's shutdown() CB
Is there somewhere "better" to do this so it's truly only tied to S5?
>
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219036
>> Cc: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@nvidia.com>
>> Tested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
>> Tested-by: Denis Benato <benato.denis96@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Merthan Karakaş <m3rthn.k@gmail.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241208074147.22945-1-kaihengf@nvidia.com
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> * Pick up tags
>> * V2 was waiting for Rafael to review, rebase on pci/next and resend.
>
> Is this change going to break kexec?
There is an explicit check in the below code for kexec_in_progress, so
my expectation was that kexec kept working. I didn't explicitly test
this myself when I tested KH's change before sending it again.
KH, Did you double check that on your side?
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> index 0c5bdb8c2c07b..5bbe8af996390 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> @@ -510,6 +510,14 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>> if (drv && drv->shutdown)
>> drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * If driver already changed device's power state, it can mean the
>> + * wakeup setting is in place, or a workaround is used. Hence keep it
>> + * as is.
>> + */
>> + if (!kexec_in_progress && pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
>> + pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
>> +
>> /*
>> * If this is a kexec reboot, turn off Bus Master bit on the
>> * device to tell it to not continue to do DMA. Don't touch
>> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 4:19 [PATCH v3] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown Mario Limonciello
2025-05-06 15:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-05-06 17:32 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-05-06 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-05-06 21:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-05-07 4:29 ` Kai-Heng Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68fdf9e1-8f27-46a6-a8a2-11ffb84726c9@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
--cc=benato.denis96@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m3rthn.k@gmail.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox