From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
quic_mrana@quicinc.com, quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] PCI: dwc: Improve handling of PCIe lane configuration
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:32:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69f4c303-bba1-7d68-7701-01820ce8701b@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250306034459.uc4qlnsnxijotplo@thinkpad>
On 3/6/2025 9:14 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 05:15:06PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>> Currently even if the number of lanes hardware supports is equal to
>> the number lanes provided in the devicetree, the driver is trying to
>> configure again the maximum number of lanes which is not needed.
>>
>> Update number of lanes only when it is not equal to hardware capability.
>>
>
> 'Update max link width only...'
>
>> And also if the num-lanes property is not present in the devicetree
>> update the num_lanes with the maximum hardware supports.
>
> '...update 'pci->num_lanes' with the hardware supported maximum link width using
> the newly introduced dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width() API.'
>
>>
>> Introduce dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width() to get the maximum lane
>> width the hardware supports.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 3 +++
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> index ffaded8f2df7..dd56cc02f4ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> @@ -504,6 +504,9 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>>
>> dw_pcie_iatu_detect(pci);
>>
>> + if (pci->num_lanes < 1)
>> + pci->num_lanes = dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width(pci);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Allocate the resource for MSG TLP before programming the iATU
>> * outbound window in dw_pcie_setup_rc(). Since the allocation depends
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index 145e7f579072..9fc5916867b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -737,12 +737,21 @@ static void dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>
>> }
>>
>> +int dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> +{
>> + u8 cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
>> + u32 lnkcap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
>> +
>> + return FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW, lnkcap);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void dw_pcie_link_set_max_link_width(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 num_lanes)
>> {
>> + int max_lanes = dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width(pci);
>> u32 lnkcap, lwsc, plc;
>> u8 cap;
>>
>> - if (!num_lanes)
>> + if (max_lanes == num_lanes)
>
> This gives the assumption that the link width in PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL and
> PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL registers are same as MLW. Is it really true as
> per the DWC spec?
>
You are correct both the values are not matching and as we are not sure
side effect of not updating it I will revert this logic.
- Krishna Chaitanya.
> - Mani
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 11:45 [PATCH v7 0/4] PCI: dwc: Add support for configuring lane equalization presets Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-02-25 11:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add PCIe lane equalization preset properties Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-03-06 3:13 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-25 11:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] PCI: of: Add API to retrieve equalization presets from device tree Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-02-26 22:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-06 3:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-11 11:01 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-03-14 15:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-25 11:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] PCI: dwc: Improve handling of PCIe lane configuration Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-03-06 3:44 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-11 11:02 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru [this message]
2025-02-25 11:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] PCI: dwc: Add support for configuring lane equalization presets Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-03-06 4:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69f4c303-bba1-7d68-7701-01820ce8701b@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_mrana@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox