Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
To: "Wenbin Yao (Consultant)" <quic_wenbyao@quicinc.com>,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	<lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>, <quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com>,
	<quic_mrana@quicinc.com>, <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Set PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH to one lane
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:09:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <854259d9-c9e6-4b25-8787-0999099bbf4d@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d862f711-428c-4e3a-b80d-e45d14e7b781@quicinc.com>


On 4/24/2025 10:49 AM, Wenbin Yao (Consultant) wrote:
> On 4/23/2025 9:24 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 06:36:23PM +0800, Wenbin Yao wrote:
>>> As per DWC PCIe registers description 4.30a, section 1.13.43, 
>>> NUM_OF_LANES
>>> named as PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH in PCIe DWC driver, is referred to as 
>>> the
>>> "Predetermined Number of Lanes" in section 4.2.6.2.1 of the PCI Express
>>> Base 3.0 Specification, revision 1.0. This section explains the 
>>> conditions
>>> need be satisfied for entering Polling.Configuration:
>>>
>>> "Next state is Polling.Configuration after at least 1024 TS1 Ordered 
>>> Sets
>>> were transmitted, and all Lanes that detected a Receiver during Detect
>>> receive eight consecutive training sequences.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, after a 24 ms timeout the next state is:
>>> Polling.Configuration if
>>> (i) Any Lane, which detected a Receiver during Detect, received eight
>>> consecutive training sequences and a minimum of 1024 TS1 Ordered 
>>> Sets are
>>> transmitted after receiving one TS1 or TS2 Ordered Set.
>>> And
>>> (ii) At least a predetermined set of Lanes that detected a Receiver 
>>> during
>>> Detect have detected an exit from Electrical Idle at least once since
>>> entering Polling.Active.
>>>
>>> Note: This may prevent one or more bad Receivers or Transmitters from
>>> holding up a valid Link from being configured, and allow for additional
>>> training in Polling.Configuration. The exact set of predetermined 
>>> Lanes is
>>> implementation specific.
>>>
>>> Note: Any Lane that receives eight consecutive TS1 or TS2 Ordered Sets
>>> should have detected an exit from Electrical Idle at least once since
>>> entering Polling.Active."
>>>
>>> In a PCIe link that supports multiple lanes, if 
>>> PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH is
>>> set to lane width hardware supports, all lanes that detect a receiver
>>> during the Detect phase must receive eight consecutive training 
>>> sequences.
>>> Otherwise, the LTSSM cannot enter Polling.Configuration and link 
>>> training
>>> will fail.
>>>
>>> Therefore, always set PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH to 1, regardless of the 
>>> number
>>> of lanes the port actually supports, to make linking up more robust. 
>>> This
>>> setting will not affect the intended link width if all lanes are
>>> functional. Additionally, the link can still be established with at 
>>> least
>>> one lane if other lanes are faulty.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenbin Yao <quic_wenbyao@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Reword commit message.
>>> - Link to v1: 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1524e971-8433-1e2d-b39e-65bad0d6c6ce@quicinc.com/
>>>
>>>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 5 +----
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c 
>>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>>> index 97d76d3dc..be348b341 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>>> @@ -797,22 +797,19 @@ static void 
>>> dw_pcie_link_set_max_link_width(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 num_lanes)
>>>       /* Set link width speed control register */
>>>       lwsc = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
>>>       lwsc &= ~PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_MASK;
>>> +    lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_1_LANES;
>>>       switch (num_lanes) {
>>>       case 1:
>>>           plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_1_LANES;
>>> -        lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_1_LANES;
>>>           break;
>>>       case 2:
>>>           plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_2_LANES;
>>> -        lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_2_LANES;
>>>           break;
>>>       case 4:
>>>           plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_4_LANES;
>>> -        lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_4_LANES;
>>>           break;
>>>       case 8:
>>>           plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_8_LANES;
>>> -        lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_8_LANES;
>>>           break;
>>>       default:
>>>           dev_err(pci->dev, "num-lanes %u: invalid value\n", 
>>> num_lanes);
>>> -- 
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>> I still see the link to my EP (which also have this patch) using all
>> four lanes according to lspci, so:
>>
>> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Thank you, Niklas, for kindly testing this patch and providing feedback.
Wenbin seems to have misunderstood you; sorry for this.
>
> This setting will not affect the intended link width if all lanes are
> functional. Additionally, the link can still be established with at least
> one lane if other lanes are faulty.
>
-- 
With best wishes
Qiang Yu


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-24  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-22 10:36 [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Set PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH to one lane Wenbin Yao
2025-04-23 13:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-24  2:49   ` Wenbin Yao (Consultant)
2025-04-24  5:09     ` Qiang Yu [this message]
2025-04-27 17:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=854259d9-c9e6-4b25-8787-0999099bbf4d@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_qianyu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_mrana@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_wenbyao@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox