Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Wenbin Yao <quic_wenbyao@quicinc.com>
Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com,
	quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com, quic_mrana@quicinc.com,
	quic_cang@quicinc.com, quic_qianyu@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Set PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH to one lane
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:24:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAjqEUifc-W-MmJy@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250422103623.462277-1-quic_wenbyao@quicinc.com>

On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 06:36:23PM +0800, Wenbin Yao wrote:
> As per DWC PCIe registers description 4.30a, section 1.13.43, NUM_OF_LANES
> named as PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH in PCIe DWC driver, is referred to as the
> "Predetermined Number of Lanes" in section 4.2.6.2.1 of the PCI Express
> Base 3.0 Specification, revision 1.0. This section explains the conditions
> need be satisfied for entering Polling.Configuration:
> 
> "Next state is Polling.Configuration after at least 1024 TS1 Ordered Sets
> were transmitted, and all Lanes that detected a Receiver during Detect
> receive eight consecutive training sequences.
> 
> Otherwise, after a 24 ms timeout the next state is:
> Polling.Configuration if
> (i) Any Lane, which detected a Receiver during Detect, received eight
> consecutive training sequences and a minimum of 1024 TS1 Ordered Sets are
> transmitted after receiving one TS1 or TS2 Ordered Set.
> And
> (ii) At least a predetermined set of Lanes that detected a Receiver during
> Detect have detected an exit from Electrical Idle at least once since
> entering Polling.Active.
> 
> Note: This may prevent one or more bad Receivers or Transmitters from
> holding up a valid Link from being configured, and allow for additional
> training in Polling.Configuration. The exact set of predetermined Lanes is
> implementation specific.
> 
> Note: Any Lane that receives eight consecutive TS1 or TS2 Ordered Sets
> should have detected an exit from Electrical Idle at least once since
> entering Polling.Active."
> 
> In a PCIe link that supports multiple lanes, if PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH is
> set to lane width hardware supports, all lanes that detect a receiver
> during the Detect phase must receive eight consecutive training sequences.
> Otherwise, the LTSSM cannot enter Polling.Configuration and link training
> will fail.
> 
> Therefore, always set PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH to 1, regardless of the number
> of lanes the port actually supports, to make linking up more robust. This
> setting will not affect the intended link width if all lanes are
> functional. Additionally, the link can still be established with at least
> one lane if other lanes are faulty.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenbin Yao <quic_wenbyao@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Reword commit message.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1524e971-8433-1e2d-b39e-65bad0d6c6ce@quicinc.com/
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 97d76d3dc..be348b341 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -797,22 +797,19 @@ static void dw_pcie_link_set_max_link_width(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 num_lanes)
>  	/* Set link width speed control register */
>  	lwsc = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
>  	lwsc &= ~PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_MASK;
> +	lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_1_LANES;
>  	switch (num_lanes) {
>  	case 1:
>  		plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_1_LANES;
> -		lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_1_LANES;
>  		break;
>  	case 2:
>  		plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_2_LANES;
> -		lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_2_LANES;
>  		break;
>  	case 4:
>  		plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_4_LANES;
> -		lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_4_LANES;
>  		break;
>  	case 8:
>  		plc |= PORT_LINK_MODE_8_LANES;
> -		lwsc |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_8_LANES;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		dev_err(pci->dev, "num-lanes %u: invalid value\n", num_lanes);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

I still see the link to my EP (which also have this patch) using all
four lanes according to lspci, so:

Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-23 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-22 10:36 [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Set PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH to one lane Wenbin Yao
2025-04-23 13:24 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-04-24  2:49   ` Wenbin Yao (Consultant)
2025-04-24  5:09     ` Qiang Yu
2025-04-27 17:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAjqEUifc-W-MmJy@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_mrana@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_qianyu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_wenbyao@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox