From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Improve PCI memory mapping API
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:29:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxjCB6cSTm2NukZP@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fced0bf9-dcd3-4c04-af19-505b943c6440@kernel.org>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:51:41AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
(snip)
> For an endpoint initiated transfer, typically, the PCI address is obtained from
> some "command" received through a BAR or through DMA. The command has the PCI
> addresses to use for transfering data to/from the host (e.g. an nvme rw command
> uses PRPs or SGLs to specify the PCI address segments for the data buffer of a
> command). For this case, the EPF driver calls calls pci_epc_mem_map() for the
> command buffer, does the transfer (memcpy_toio/fromio()) and unmaps with
> pci_epc_mem_unmap(). Note though that here, if an eDMA channel is used for the
> transfer, the DMA engine will do the mapping automatically and the epf does not
> need to call pci_epc_mem_map()/pci_epc_mem_unmap(). There is still an issue in
> this area which is that it is *not* clear if the DMA channel used can actually
> do the mapping automatically or not. E.g. the generic DMA channel (mem copy
> offload engine) will not. So there is still some API improvement needed to
> abstract more HW dependent things here.
FWIW, in my final reply here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZiYuIaX7ZV0exKMt@ryzen/
"
I did suggest that DWC-based drivers could set a DMA_SLAVE_SKIP_MEM_MAP flag
or similar when registering the eDMA, which pci-epf-test then could check,
but I got no response if anyone else thought that this was a good idea.
"
For DMA_SLAVE (private tx/rx DMA channels):
For DWC-based controllers, we can definitely set DMA_SLAVE_SKIP_MEM_MAP when
registering the eDMA (e.g. in dw_pcie_edma_detect()).
However, I don't know how the DMA hardware (if any) in:
drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-ep.c
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
works, so I'm not sure if those drivers can set DMA_SLAVE_SKIP_MEM_MAP
(the safest thing is to not set that flag, until we know how they work).
For DMA_MEMCPY:
We know that we need to perform pci_epc_mem_map() when using
DMA API + "dummy" memcpy dma-channel (DMA_MEMCPY).
I could imagine that some embedded DMA controllers also provide
DMA_MEMCPY capabilities (in addition to DMA_SLAVE).
So I guess the safest thing is to call the flag something like:
PCI_EPC_DMA_SKIP_MEM_MAP
(rather than PCI_EPC_DMA_SLAVE_SKIP_MEM_MAP).
(since the embedded DMA controller might provide both DMA_SLAVE and DMA_MEMCPY).
And let the EPC driver (e.g. dw_pcie_edma_detect()), or possibly the DMA
driver itself to provide/set this flag.
Kind regards,
Niklas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-23 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 11:32 [PATCH v6 0/6] Improve PCI memory mapping API Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] PCI: endpoint: Introduce pci_epc_function_is_valid() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] PCI: endpoint: Improve pci_epc_mem_alloc_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] PCI: endpoint: Introduce pci_epc_mem_map()/unmap() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 11:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-13 9:06 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-10-14 13:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-15 6:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] PCI: endpoint: Update documentation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 11:48 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] PCI: endpoint: test: Use pci_epc_mem_map/unmap() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] PCI: dwc: endpoint: Implement the pci_epc_ops::align_addr() operation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 11:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 11:57 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] Improve PCI memory mapping API Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 12:03 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-21 22:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-22 1:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-22 8:38 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-10-22 11:57 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-22 13:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-22 14:16 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-10-22 15:18 ` Frank Li
2024-10-22 15:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-22 22:12 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-22 20:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-22 22:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-22 23:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-23 2:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-23 9:29 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxjCB6cSTm2NukZP@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox