From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Linux ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux PM" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Peixin Xie" <peixin.xie@linux.spacemit.com>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Linux PCI" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] ACPI: scan: Combine two conditionals in acpi_bus_attach()
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 11:40:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apaPjaBH48O4V03m@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2021470.taCxCBeP46@rafael.j.wysocki>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 07:59:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> There are two conditionals in acpi_bus_attach() that can be combined,
> which slightly reduces the overhead and makes the code a bit easier
> to follow, so do that.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
...
> - if (ret > 0 && !device->flags.enumeration_by_parent) {
> + if (!device->flags.enumeration_by_parent && (ret > 0 ||
> + (!device->pnp.type.platform_id && !device->pnp.type.backlight)))
> acpi_device_set_enumerated(device);
> - goto ok;
> - }
> -
> - if (device->pnp.type.platform_id || device->pnp.type.backlight ||
> - device->flags.enumeration_by_parent)
> - acpi_default_enumeration(device);
> else
> - acpi_device_set_enumerated(device);
> + acpi_default_enumeration(device);
I would leave a longer line (having logical split)
if (!device->flags.enumeration_by_parent &&
(ret > 0 || (!device->pnp.type.platform_id && !device->pnp.type.backlight)))
acpi_device_set_enumerated(device);
else
acpi_default_enumeration(device);
Or even going further and cleaning too many negations (if I'm not mistaken in
the logic)
if (device->flags.enumeration_by_parent ||
// not sure what the expected ret values here, maybe < 0 or == 0 part is not needed
(ret <= 0 && (device->pnp.type.platform_id || device->pnp.type.backlight)))
acpi_default_enumeration(device);
else
acpi_device_set_enumerated(device);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 16:20 [PATCH v1 0/7] ACPI: scan: Address power management initialization and PCI devices handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 16:24 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] ACPI: scan: Stop calling acpi_bus_init_power() early Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 20:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-01 8:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-31 16:25 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] ACPI: PM: Introduce acpi_device_init_power() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 20:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 8:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-01 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-08-31 17:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] ACPI: bus: Drop initialized flag from struct acpi_device_flags Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 21:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 17:59 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] ACPI: scan: Combine two conditionals in acpi_bus_attach() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 21:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 8:40 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-09-01 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-08-31 17:59 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] ACPI: scan: Add ACPI device "enumerated" marker Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 21:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 17:59 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] ACPI: scan: Adjust and rename acpi_bus_attach() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 21:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 17:59 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] ACPI: scan: Take PCI device enumeration into account directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-08-31 21:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 8:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-01 19:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] ACPI: scan: Address power management initialization and PCI devices handling Peixin Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apaPjaBH48O4V03m@ashevche-desk.local \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peixin.xie@linux.spacemit.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox