From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <praan@google.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<kees@kernel.org>, <smostafa@google.com>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<skaestle@nvidia.com>, <mmarrid@nvidia.com>,
<skolothumtho@nvidia.com>, <bbiber@nvidia.com>,
<harsha.v@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drain in-flight fault events on domain detach
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 15:57:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aptMynoQtAf1Jcr5@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904140906.GR4157646@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 11:09:06AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 12:18:33PM -0700, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > Also run the drain for every stall-capable master, even when the departing
> > > attachment did not enable IOPF: such a stall event has to be aborted while
> > > it still resolves to the old attach handle,
>
> That isn't the model for fault handling. The fault is delivered
> unpredictably into either old or new domain. It doesn't matter which
> one.
>
> Domains have to conclude their fault proceessing before they are
> destroyed, and attach to the a non-fault domain has to conclude faults
> before completing the attach.
>
> But there is no requirement to deliver faults to any particular thing.
Edited:
Also run the drain for every stall-capable master, even when the departing
attachment did not enable IOPF. An attachment has to conclude its in-flight
faults before the attach completes, as the incoming domain might not handle
a fault at all.
> > > could pick it up right after the handle swap, mistakenly resuming it as if
> > > it were a valid page fault against a new domain.
> >
> > Useful perhaps to call out if this has been seen in real systems or
> > not. I agree with the analysis but would rather hope drivers are
> > well behaved in ensuring all traffic is done, adn this is hardeninging
> > / handling of naught hardware activity (all good if so!)
>
> There is a firm API contract on the iommu drivers, they cannot
> propogate faults at unexpected times because the consumers cannot deal
> with it.
>
> We don't reason about well behaved drivers at this level because vfio
> cannot be trusted to be well behaved. So any nonsense vfio can trigger
> has to be handled without crashing the kernel.
Added:
This is an API contract, not hardening against odd hardware: a detach may
arrive at any moment from a userspace driver behind VFIO, which cannot be
trusted to quiesce its device first.
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 0:33 [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add PRI support Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_attach_release() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 20:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add Q_POS() macro Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drain in-flight fault events on domain detach Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-04 22:57 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-09-04 21:42 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Flush in-flight fault work " Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 0:54 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOPF queue without FEAT_SVA Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Submit CMDQ_OP_PRI_RESP for IOPF event Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 1:15 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable the queue IRQs before disabling the SMMU Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 3:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable PRI when no IRQ handler is registered Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 14:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support PRI Page Request in arm_smmu_handle_ppr() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 5:08 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOPF queue for ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] PCI/ATS: Add PRI stubs Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] PCI/ATS: Export pci_enable_pri() and pci_reset_pri() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable PRI for PCI device in arm_smmu_probe_device() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 5:53 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add PRI support Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aptMynoQtAf1Jcr5@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bbiber@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=harsha.v@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skaestle@nvidia.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox