From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
bhelgaas@google.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, sdonthineni@nvidia.com,
kthota@nvidia.com, mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, sagar.tv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] PCI/MSI: Fix MSI hwirq truncation
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:03:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9a7b855-af2b-4858-b9d8-3340a0421cfe@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bk9qim4p.ffs@tglx>
On 1/12/2024 9:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 11 2024 at 10:58, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> While calculating the hwirq number for an MSI interrupt, the higher
>> bits (i.e. from bit-5 onwards a.k.a domain_nr >= 32) of the PCI domain
>> number gets truncated because of the shifted value casting to return
>> type of pci_domain_nr() which is 'int'. This for example is resulting
>> in same hwirq number for devices 0019:00:00.0 and 0039:00:00.0.
>>
>> So, cast the PCI domain number to 'irq_hw_number_t' before left shifting
>> it to calculate hwirq number.
>
> This still does not explain that this fixes it only on 64-bit platforms
> and why we don't care for 32-bit systems.
Agree that this fixes the issue only on 64-bit platforms. It doesn't
change the behavior on 32-bit platforms. My understanding is that the
issue surfaces only if there are too many PCIe controllers in the system
which usually is the case in modern server systems and it is arguable if
the server systems really run 32-bit kernels.
One way to fix it for both 32-bit and 64-bit systems is by changing the
type of 'hwirq' to u64. This may cause two memory reads in 32-bit
systems whenever 'hwirq' is accessed and that may intern cause some perf
impact?? Is this the way you think I should be handling it?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-12 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-05 13:43 [PATCH V1] PCI/MSI: Fix MSI hwirq truncation Vidya Sagar
2024-01-05 17:02 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-01-08 11:58 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-01-08 12:05 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar
2024-01-08 14:09 ` Shanker Donthineni
2024-01-10 10:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-10 18:04 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-01-11 5:28 ` [PATCH V3] " Vidya Sagar
2024-01-12 15:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-12 17:33 ` Vidya Sagar [this message]
2024-01-15 10:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-15 13:50 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-01-15 13:56 ` [PATCH V4] " Vidya Sagar
2024-01-23 16:01 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-01-31 3:15 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-02-07 6:59 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-02-07 10:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9a7b855-af2b-4858-b9d8-3340a0421cfe@nvidia.com \
--to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox