public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@foss.st.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	<alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	<cassel@kernel.org>, <quic_schintav@quicinc.com>,
	<fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe host support for STM32MP25
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:24:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d15cec4e-e06a-47f7-aa8a-744c0829d244@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218094606.sljdx2w27thc5ahj@thinkpad>



On 12/18/24 10:46, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:00:27AM +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>
>>>> +		msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
>>>> +
>>>> +	return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void stm32_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = to_stm32_pcie(pci);
>>>> +
>>>> +	regmap_update_bits(stm32_pcie->regmap, SYSCFG_PCIECR,
>>>> +			   STM32MP25_PCIECR_LTSSM_EN, 0);
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Assert PERST# */
>>>> +	if (stm32_pcie->perst_gpio)
>>>> +		gpiod_set_value(stm32_pcie->perst_gpio, 1);
>>>
>>> I don't like tying PERST# handling with start/stop link. PERST# should be
>>> handled based on the power/clock state.
>>
>> I don't understand your point: We turn off the PHY in suspend_noirq(), so
>> that seems a logical place to de-assert in resume_noirq after the refclk is
>> ready. PERST# should be kept active until the PHY stablilizes the clock in
>> resume. From the PCIe electromechanical specs, PERST# goes active while the
>> refclk is not stable/
>>
> 
> While your understanding about PERST# is correct, your implementation is not.
> You are toggling PERST# from start/stop link callbacks which are supposed to
> control the LTSSM state only. I don't have issues with toggling PERST# in
> stm32_pcie_{suspend/resume}_noirq().

Ah OK. this function is split now into 2 functional blocks in the 
upcoming version

> 
>>
>>>
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int stm32_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev) || device_wakeup_path(dev))
>>>> +		enable_irq_wake(stm32_pcie->wake_irq);
>>>> +
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int stm32_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev) || device_wakeup_path(dev))
>>>> +		disable_irq_wake(stm32_pcie->wake_irq);
>>>> +
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int stm32_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +	stm32_pcie->link_is_up = dw_pcie_link_up(stm32_pcie->pci);
>>>> +
>>>> +	stm32_pcie_stop_link(stm32_pcie->pci);
>>>
>>> I don't understand how endpoint can wakeup the host if PERST# gets asserted.
>>
>> The stm32 PCIe doesn't support L2, we don't expect an in-band beacon for the
>> wakeup. We support wakeup only from sideband WAKE#, that will restart the
>> link from IRQ
>>
> 
> I don't understand how WAKE# is supported without L2. Only in L2 state, endpoint
> will make use of Vaux and it will wakeup the host using either beacon or WAKE#.
> If you don't support L2, then the endpoint will reach L3 (link off) state.

I think this is what happens, my understanding is that the device is 
still powered to get the wakeup event (eg WoL magic packet), triggers 
the PCIe wake_IRQ from the WAKE#.

> 
>>>
>>>> +	clk_disable_unprepare(stm32_pcie->clk);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!device_may_wakeup(dev) && !device_wakeup_path(dev))
>>>> +		phy_exit(stm32_pcie->phy);
>>>> +
>>>> +	return pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int stm32_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = stm32_pcie->pci;
>>>> +	struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pci->pp;
>>>> +	int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* init_state must be called first to force clk_req# gpio when no
>>>
>>> CLKREQ#
>>>
>>> Why RC should control CLKREQ#?
>>
>> REFCLK is gated with CLKREQ#, So we cannot access the core
>> without CLKREQ# if no device is present. So force it with a init pinmux
>> the time to init the PHY and the core DBI registers
>>
> 
> Ok. You should add a comment to clarify it in the code as this is not a standard
> behavior.
> 

OK

>>>
>>> Also please use preferred style for multi-line comments:
>>>
>>> 	/*
>>> 	 * ...
>>> 	 */
>>>
>>>> +	 * device is plugged.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	if (!IS_ERR(dev->pins->init_state))
>>>> +		ret = pinctrl_select_state(dev->pins->p, dev->pins->init_state);
>>>> +	else
>>>> +		ret = pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (ret) {
>>>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to activate pinctrl pm state: %d\n", ret);
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!device_may_wakeup(dev) && !device_wakeup_path(dev)) {
>>>> +		ret = phy_init(stm32_pcie->phy);
>>>> +		if (ret) {
>>>> +			pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
>>>> +			return ret;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(stm32_pcie->clk);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		goto clk_err;
>>>
>>> Please name the goto labels of their purpose. Like err_phy_exit.
>>
>> OK
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		goto pcie_err;
>>>
>>> This should be, 'err_disable_clk'.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (stm32_pcie->link_is_up) {
>>>
>>> Why do you need this check? You cannot start the link in the absence of an
>>> endpoint?
>>>
>>
>> It is an optimization to avoid unnecessary "dw_pcie_wait_for_link" if no
>> device is present during suspend
>>
> 
> In that case you'll not trigger LTSSM if there was no endpoint connected before
> suspend. What if users connect an endpoint after resume?

Yes, exactly. We don't support hotplug, and plugging a device while the 
system is in stand-by is something that we don't expect. The imx6 
platform does this also.

thanks,

Christian

> 
> - Mani
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-26 15:51 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add STM32MP25 PCIe drivers Christian Bruel
2024-11-26 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: PCI: Add STM32MP25 PCIe root complex bindings Christian Bruel
2024-11-27 14:50   ` Rob Herring
2024-12-03 13:34   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-03 16:55     ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-03 22:25   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-05 13:41     ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-05 17:20       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-17 15:53         ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-17 17:25           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-18  8:42             ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-18  9:06               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-17 17:20     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-05 17:23   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-26 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe host support for STM32MP25 Christian Bruel
2024-11-29 20:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-29 21:18     ` Lucas Stach
2024-12-05 11:46       ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-03 14:52   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-16  9:00     ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-18  9:46       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-18 11:24         ` Christian Bruel [this message]
2024-12-18 11:46           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-09  4:34   ` kernel test robot
2024-11-26 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: PCI: Add STM32MP25 PCIe endpoint bindings Christian Bruel
2024-11-27 14:51   ` Rob Herring
2024-11-27 14:59   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-12-03 14:54   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-26 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe endpoint support for STM32MP25 Christian Bruel
2024-12-03 15:22   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-16 10:02     ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-16 16:17       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-17  9:48         ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-18  9:08           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-18  9:21             ` Christian Bruel
2025-01-10 15:33         ` Christian Bruel
2025-01-10 14:49     ` Christian Bruel
2024-12-05 17:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-16 14:00     ` Christian Bruel
2025-01-14 17:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-14 12:10     ` Christian Bruel
2024-11-26 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: add entry for ST STM32MP25 PCIe drivers Christian Bruel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d15cec4e-e06a-47f7-aa8a-744c0829d244@foss.st.com \
    --to=christian.bruel@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=quic_schintav@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox