From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar-gen4: Fix inverted break condition in PHY initialization
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:31:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de4e4003-214f-4260-854c-d15efc81bb74@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVrw1Mr_hKvgve03DQwvpqSPNaN5XUnYRJPXMeX1wvv0A@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/16/25 3:57 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hello Geert,
> On Tue, 16 Sept 2025 at 15:39, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
>> On 9/16/25 11:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Sept 2025 at 01:59, Marek Vasut
>>> <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> wrote:
>>>> R-Car V4H Reference Manual R19UH0186EJ0130 Rev.1.30 Apr. 21, 2025 page 4581
>>>> Figure 104.3b Initial Setting of PCIEC(example), third quarter of the figure
>>>> indicates that register 0xf8 should be polled until bit 18 becomes set to 1.
>>>>
>>>> Register 0xf8 bit 18 is 0 immediately after write to PCIERSTCTRL1 and is set
>>>> to 1 in less than 1 ms afterward. The current readl_poll_timeout() break
>>>> condition is inverted and returns when register 0xf8 bit 18 is set to 0,
>>>> which in most cases means immediately. In case CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y ,
>>>> the timing changes just enough for the first readl_poll_timeout() poll to
>>>> already read register 0xf8 bit 18 as 1 and afterward never read register
>>>> 0xf8 bit 18 as 0, which leads to timeout and failure to start the PCIe
>>>> controller.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by inverting the poll condition to match the reference manual
>>>> initialization sequence.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: faf5a975ee3b ("PCI: rcar-gen4: Add support for R-Car V4H")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patch!
>>>
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
>>>> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static int rcar_gen4_pcie_ltssm_control(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar, bool enable
>>>> val &= ~APP_HOLD_PHY_RST;
>>>> writel(val, rcar->base + PCIERSTCTRL1);
>>>>
>>>> - ret = readl_poll_timeout(rcar->phy_base + 0x0f8, val, !(val & BIT(18)), 100, 10000);
>>>> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(rcar->phy_base + 0x0f8, val, val & BIT(18), 100, 10000);
>>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>> return ret;
>>>>
>>>
>>> This change looks correct, and fixes the timeout seen on White Hawk
>>> with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y.
>>> However, it causes a crash when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n:
>>>
>>> SError Interrupt on CPU0, code 0x00000000be000011 -- SError
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> el1h_64_error_handler+0x2c/0x40
>>> el1h_64_error+0x70/0x74
>>> dw_pcie_read+0x20/0x74 (P)
>>> rcar_gen4_pcie_additional_common_init+0x1c/0x6c
>>
>> SError in rcar_gen4_pcie_additional_common_init , this is unrelated to
>> this fix.
>>
>> Does the following patch make this SError go away ?
>
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
>> @@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ static int rcar_gen4_pcie_common_init(struct
>> rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_unprepare;
>>
>> +mdelay(1);
>> +
>> if (rcar->drvdata->additional_common_init)
>> rcar->drvdata->additional_common_init(rcar);
>>
>
> Yes it does, thanks!
So with this one extra mdelay(1), the PCIe is fully good on your side,
or is there still anything weird/flaky/malfunctioning ?
If you could give me a RB/TB on this fix, it would be nice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 23:58 [PATCH] PCI: rcar-gen4: Fix inverted break condition in PHY initialization Marek Vasut
2025-09-16 9:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-16 13:39 ` Marek Vasut
2025-09-16 13:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-16 16:31 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2025-09-16 17:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-16 17:39 ` Marek Vasut
2025-09-16 18:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-16 22:09 ` Marek Vasut
2025-09-17 8:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-17 13:44 ` Marek Vasut
2025-09-17 7:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-18 3:16 ` Marek Vasut
2025-09-22 10:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-22 15:17 ` Marek Vasut
2025-09-22 15:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-22 15:49 ` Marek Vasut
2025-09-23 7:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-25 16:36 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de4e4003-214f-4260-854c-d15efc81bb74@mailbox.org \
--to=marek.vasut@mailbox.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox