From: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: Check rom header and data structure addr before accessing
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 19:19:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb3f6f5a-fca4-4367-ae16-7dc42dc960f3@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d53a3913-c08c-94e0-e2ad-f2c7bd198250@linux.intel.com>
在 2025/12/11 17:59, Ilpo Järvinen 写道:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Guixin Liu wrote:
>
>> We meet a crash when running stress-ng on x86_64 machine:
>>
>> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffa0000007f40000
>> RIP: 0010:pci_get_rom_size+0x52/0x220
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> pci_map_rom+0x80/0x130
>> pci_read_rom+0x4b/0xe0
>> kernfs_file_read_iter+0x96/0x180
>> vfs_read+0x1b1/0x300
>>
>> Our analysis reveals that the rom space's start address is
>> 0xffa0000007f30000, and size is 0x10000. Because of broken rom
>> space, before calling readl(pds), the pds's value is
>> 0xffa0000007f3ffff, which is already pointed to the rom space
>> end, invoking readl() would read 4 bytes therefore cause an
>> out-of-bounds access and trigger a crash.
>> Fix this by adding image header and data structure checking.
>>
>> We also found another crash on arm64 machine:
>>
>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
>> ffff8000dd1393ff
>> Mem abort info:
>> ESR = 0x0000000096000021
>> EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>> SET = 0, FnV = 0
>> EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
>> FSC = 0x21: alignment fault
>>
>> The call trace is the same with x86_64, but the crash reason is
>> that the data structure addr is not aligned with 4, and arm64
>> machine report "alignment fault". Fix this by adding alignment
>> checking.
>>
>> Fixes: 47b975d234ea ("PCI: Avoid iterating through memory outside the resource window")
>> Suggested-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/rom.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/rom.c b/drivers/pci/rom.c
>> index 3e00611fa76b..8cbcc55946a4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/rom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/rom.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/bits.h>
>> +#include <linux/align.h>
>> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
> Order.
Sure.
>> #include "pci.h"
>>
>> @@ -80,6 +83,87 @@ void pci_disable_rom(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_disable_rom);
>>
>> +static bool pci_rom_is_header_valid(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> + void __iomem *image,
>> + void __iomem *rom,
>> + size_t size,
>> + bool last_image)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long rom_end = (unsigned long)rom + size - 1;
>> + unsigned long header_end;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Some CPU architectures require IOMEM access addresses to
>> + * be aligned, for example arm64, so since we're about to
>> + * call readw(), we check here for 2-byte alignment.
>> + */
>> + if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)image, 2))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (check_add_overflow((unsigned long)image, PCI_ROM_HEADER_SIZE,
>> + &header_end))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (image < rom || header_end > rom_end)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /* Standard PCI ROMs start out with these bytes 55 AA */
>> + if (readw(image) == PCI_ROM_IMAGE_SIGNATURE)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (last_image) {
>> + pci_info(pdev, "Invalid PCI ROM header signature: expecting %#06x, got %#06x\n",
>> + PCI_ROM_IMAGE_SIGNATURE, readw(image));
> You should store the readw() value above as you use it here too so you
> don't need to read it again.
Sure.
>> + } else {
>> + pci_info(pdev, "No more image in the PCI ROM\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool pci_rom_is_data_struct_valid(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> + void __iomem *pds,
>> + void __iomem *rom,
>> + size_t size)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long rom_end = (unsigned long)rom + size - 1;
>> + unsigned long end;
>> + u16 data_len;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Some CPU architectures require IOMEM access addresses to
>> + * be aligned, for example arm64, so since we're about to
>> + * call readl(), we check here for 4-byte alignment.
>> + */
>> + if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)pds, 4))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /* Before reading length, check addr range. */
>> + if (check_add_overflow((unsigned long)pds, PCI_ROM_DATA_STRUCT_LEN + 1,
>> + &end))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (pds < rom || end > rom_end)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + data_len = readw(pds + PCI_ROM_DATA_STRUCT_LEN);
>> + if (!data_len || data_len == U16_MAX)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (check_add_overflow((unsigned long)pds, data_len, &end))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (end > rom_end)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (readl(pds) == PCI_ROM_DATA_STRUCT_SIGNATURE)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + pci_info(pdev, "Invalid PCI ROM data signature: expecting %#010x, got %#010x\n",
>> + PCI_ROM_DATA_STRUCT_SIGNATURE, readl(pds));
> Ditto.
>
Sure.
I will change all in next version, thanks.
Best Regards,
Guixin Liu
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * pci_get_rom_size - obtain the actual size of the ROM image
>> * @pdev: target PCI device
>> @@ -95,37 +179,28 @@ static size_t pci_get_rom_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *rom,
>> size_t size)
>> {
>> void __iomem *image;
>> - int last_image;
>> + bool last_image;
>> unsigned int length;
>>
>> image = rom;
>> do {
>> void __iomem *pds;
>> - /* Standard PCI ROMs start out with these bytes 55 AA */
>> - if (readw(image) != 0xAA55) {
>> - pci_info(pdev, "Invalid PCI ROM header signature: expecting 0xaa55, got %#06x\n",
>> - readw(image));
>> +
>> + if (!pci_rom_is_header_valid(pdev, image, rom, size, true))
>> break;
>> - }
>> +
>> /* get the PCI data structure and check its "PCIR" signature */
>> - pds = image + readw(image + 24);
>> - if (readl(pds) != 0x52494350) {
>> - pci_info(pdev, "Invalid PCI ROM data signature: expecting 0x52494350, got %#010x\n",
>> - readl(pds));
>> + pds = image + readw(image + PCI_ROM_POINTER_TO_DATA_STRUCT);
>> + if (!pci_rom_is_data_struct_valid(pdev, pds, rom, size))
>> break;
>> - }
>> - last_image = readb(pds + 21) & 0x80;
>> - length = readw(pds + 16);
>> - image += length * 512;
>> - /* Avoid iterating through memory outside the resource window */
>> - if (image >= rom + size)
>> +
>> + last_image = readb(pds + PCI_ROM_LAST_IMAGE_INDICATOR) &
>> + PCI_ROM_LAST_IMAGE_INDICATOR_BIT;
>> + length = readw(pds + PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN);
>> + image += length * PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN_UNIT_SZ_512;
>> +
>> + if (!pci_rom_is_header_valid(pdev, image, rom, size, last_image))
>> break;
>> - if (!last_image) {
>> - if (readw(image) != 0xAA55) {
>> - pci_info(pdev, "No more image in the PCI ROM\n");
>> - break;
>> - }
>> - }
>> } while (length && !last_image);
>>
>> /* never return a size larger than the PCI resource window */
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 3:37 [PATCH v7 0/2] PCI: Fix crash when access broken rom Guixin Liu
2025-12-11 3:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] PCI: Introduce named defines for pci rom Guixin Liu
2025-12-11 9:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-11 11:18 ` Guixin Liu
2025-12-11 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-11 3:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: Check rom header and data structure addr before accessing Guixin Liu
2025-12-11 9:59 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-11 11:19 ` Guixin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb3f6f5a-fca4-4367-ae16-7dc42dc960f3@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox