From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Srirangan Madhavan" <smadhavan@nvidia.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 11/19] PCI/CXL: Cache endpoint HDM state during PCI enumeration
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 19:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-199916@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105185917.2667656-12-smadhavan@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] PCI/CXL: missing all-ones checks when caching HDM and DVSEC control state
- [High] PCI/CXL: out-of-bounds MMIO read and size underflow in cxl_pci_hdm_map_regs()
- [High] PCI/CXL: pci_cxl_hdm_cache_init() runs before BAR survey and bridge enable
- [Medium] cxl/pci: disable_hdm() leaves stale CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE in cached state
--
commit e053ed26c570120750868c635b177e4dbb11e00d
Author: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
PCI/CXL: Cache endpoint HDM state during PCI enumeration
This commit caches CXL endpoint HDM register locations, decoder settings,
and Device DVSEC state in pci_dev->hdm during PCI enumeration so that reset
paths can restore HDM state without a bound CXL driver.
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 5272013548c73..ea5327cd627fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -209,22 +209,31 @@ static int cxl_set_mem_enable(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, u16 val)
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * Refresh the PCI-core cache from the live register even when
> + * MEM_ENABLE already matched: a reset restores the cached value.
> + */
> + cxl_hdm_cache_set_dvsec_ctrl(pdev, ctrl);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void clear_mem_enable(void *cxlds)
[Severity: Medium]
As reported by Sashiko on v16 [1], when the CXL driver unbinds or unwinds
probe, can disable_hdm() leave a stale CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE bit set in
pdev->hdm->global_ctrl?
When the CXL driver binds and platform firmware did not pre-enable HDM,
devm_cxl_endpoint_decoders_setup() runs:
cxl_hdm_decode_init()
devm_cxl_enable_hdm() /* sets CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE in MMIO */
devm_cxl_enable_mem()
cxl_set_mem_enable() /* updates pdev->hdm->dvsec_ctrl */
devm_cxl_enumerate_decoders()
cxl_hdm_refresh_decoder()
cxl_hdm_cache_refresh_decoder()
info->global_ctrl = readl(hdm + CXL_HDM_DECODER_CTRL_OFFSET);
which latches CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE into pdev->hdm->global_ctrl.
On driver unbind or probe failure, devres runs clear_mem_enable(), which
clears PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_ENABLE in both hardware and pdev->hdm->dvsec_ctrl,
and then runs disable_hdm():
static void disable_hdm(void *_cxlhdm)
{
u32 global_ctrl;
struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm = _cxlhdm;
void __iomem *hdm = cxlhdm->regs.hdm_decoder;
global_ctrl = readl(hdm + CXL_HDM_DECODER_CTRL_OFFSET);
writel(global_ctrl & ~CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE,
hdm + CXL_HDM_DECODER_CTRL_OFFSET);
}
Because disable_hdm() clears CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE in hardware without
updating pdev->hdm->global_ctrl, a subsequent reset while unbound will
restore CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE in hardware while PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_ENABLE
remains disabled, and a later driver re-bind in cxl_hdm_decode_init() will
see global_ctrl & CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE set and assume firmware enabled it.
Should disable_hdm() (or devm_cxl_enable_hdm()) also update the cached
global_ctrl in pdev->hdm?
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> index 655ed53436d3e..aad567fb7c560 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> @@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> /* Save config space for error recoverability */
> pci_save_state(dev);
> + pci_cxl_hdm_cache_init(dev);
[Severity: High]
As reported by Sashiko on v16 [2], does calling pci_cxl_hdm_cache_init() in
pci_bus_add_device() run too early during boot and miss upstream bridge
enablement?
On x86 ACPI boot, subsys_initcall(acpi_init) calls:
acpi_pci_root_add()
pci_bus_add_devices()
pci_bus_add_device()
pci_cxl_hdm_cache_init()
before subsys_initcall(pci_subsys_init) runs pcibios_resource_survey() and
before fs_initcall(pcibios_assign_resources) runs
pci_assign_unassigned_resources().
In addition, cxl_pci_bar_assigned() in drivers/pci/cxl.c checks only
res->start and res->end without verifying res->parent, and
cxl_pci_hdm_read_info() sets PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY only on the endpoint pdev
without ensuring upstream PCI-to-PCI bridges have memory decoding enabled.
Can this cause cxl_pci_hdm_read_info() to enable PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY on an
unclaimed or conflicting BIOS BAR address before pcibios_resource_survey()
validates it, or fail to populate pdev->hdm permanently when BARs or bridge
windows are assigned later or upstream bridges do not yet have
PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY enabled?
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/cxl.c b/drivers/pci/cxl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..a0d20f4210a52
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/cxl.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
[ ... ]
> +static void __iomem *cxl_pci_hdm_map_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_register_map *map,
> + resource_size_t *hdm_offset,
> + int *decoder_count)
> +{
> + struct cxl_reg_map *hdm_map = &map->component_map.hdm_decoder;
> + void __iomem *hdm;
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* cxl_setup_regs() populates hdm_map, including its valid bit. */
> + rc = cxl_setup_regs(map);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> + if (!hdm_map->valid)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + if (hdm_map->offset > map->max_size ||
> + hdm_map->size > map->max_size - hdm_map->offset)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> + if (check_add_overflow(map->bar_offset,
> + (resource_size_t)hdm_map->offset, hdm_offset))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW);
> +
> + hdm = ioremap(map->resource + hdm_map->offset, hdm_map->size);
> + if (!hdm)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + *decoder_count = cxl_hdm_decoder_count_mapped(&pdev->dev, hdm,
> + hdm_map->size);
[Severity: High]
As reported by Sashiko on v16 [3], can cxl_pci_hdm_map_regs() perform
out-of-bounds MMIO reads inside cxl_setup_regs() before the map->max_size
bounds check runs, and underflow hdm_map->size when the HDM capability
header has an invalid decoder count?
In __pci_cxl_hdm_cache_init(), cxl_find_regblock() populates map via
cxl_decode_regblock(), which only checks offset <= pci_resource_len(pdev, bar)
and sets map->max_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) - offset.
When cxl_pci_hdm_map_regs() calls cxl_setup_regs(map):
cxl_setup_regs()
cxl_map_regblock() /* ioremap(map->resource, map->max_size) */
cxl_probe_regs()
cxl_probe_component_regs()
cxl_probe_component_regs() immediately reads from map->base + CXL_CM_OFFSET
and map->base + CXL_CM_OFFSET + offset before cxl_pci_hdm_map_regs() checks
hdm_map->offset > map->max_size. If map->max_size is smaller than those
offsets, the read can fault past the ioremap() window.
Furthermore, in cxl_probe_component_regs():
case CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_HDM: {
int decoder_cnt;
decoder_cnt = cxl_hdm_decoder_count(hdr);
length = 0x20 * decoder_cnt + 0x10;
rmap = &map->hdm_decoder;
break;
}
If hdr contains a reserved decoder count encoding (such as 0xffffffff from a
failed MMIO read), cxl_hdm_decoder_count() returns -ENXIO (-6), underflowing
u32 length to 0xffffff50 (~4 GiB) while still marking hdm_map->valid = true.
If the BAR has at least 4 GiB remaining, cxl_pci_hdm_map_regs() passes
hdm_map->size (0xffffff50) to ioremap() before cxl_hdm_decoder_count_mapped()
checks the decoder count.
> + if (*decoder_count < 0) {
> + iounmap(hdm);
> + return ERR_PTR(*decoder_count);
> + }
> +
> + return hdm;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cxl_hdm_info *__cxl_pci_hdm_read_info(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_register_map *map,
> + int dvsec)
> +{
> + struct cxl_reg_map *hdm_map = &map->component_map.hdm_decoder;
> + struct cxl_hdm_info *info;
> + resource_size_t hdm_offset;
> + void __iomem *hdm;
> + int decoder_count;
> + u16 dvsec_ctrl;
> + int rc;
> +
> + hdm = cxl_pci_hdm_map_regs(pdev, map, &hdm_offset, &decoder_count);
> + if (IS_ERR(hdm))
> + return ERR_CAST(hdm);
> +
> + rc = pci_read_config_word(pdev, dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CTRL,
> + &dvsec_ctrl);
> + if (rc) {
> + rc = pcibios_err_to_errno(rc);
> + goto out_unmap;
> + }
[ ... ]
> +static struct cxl_hdm_info *cxl_pci_hdm_read_info(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_register_map *map,
> + int dvsec)
> +{
> + struct cxl_hdm_info *info;
> + u16 command;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &command);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(pcibios_err_to_errno(rc));
> +
> + if (!(command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY)) {
> + rc = pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND,
> + command | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(pcibios_err_to_errno(rc));
> + }
[Severity: High]
Can all-ones config and MMIO error responses (0xffff / 0xffffffff) corrupt
the cached state or bypass enabling PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY here?
In cxl_set_mem_enable() and cxl_pci_device_dvsec(), pci_read_config_word()
is followed by a PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() check because PCI config reads to a
non-responding device typically return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL with an all-ones
value.
However, in several paths here, all-ones reads are not checked:
1. In __cxl_pci_hdm_read_info(), pci_read_config_word(pdev,
dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CTRL, &dvsec_ctrl) does not check
PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(dvsec_ctrl) before storing info->dvsec_ctrl = dvsec_ctrl
and info->dvsec_ctrl_valid = true. Per CXL r4.0 sec 8.1.3.2, bits 15, 13:12,
and 6:3 of DVSEC CXL Control are RsvdP, so 0xffff is never valid, and caching
it would cause reset recovery to write 0xffff back to PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CTRL.
2. In cxl_pci_hdm_read_info(), pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND,
&command) does not check PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(command). Because 0xffff has
PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY set, an all-ones read is treated as memory space already
being enabled and proceeds directly to MMIO reads.
3. In cxl_hdm_read_state() in drivers/cxl/core/hdm_regs.c:
info->global_ctrl = readl(hdm + CXL_HDM_DECODER_CTRL_OFFSET);
global_ctrl is stored without checking for U32_MAX, unlike
cxl_hdm_cache_refresh_decoder() in drivers/cxl/core/hdm_state.c which checks
global_ctrl != U32_MAX, and settings->skip in cxl_hdm_read_decoder_settings()
is not checked for U64_MAX (unlike base and size in
cxl_hdm_unpack_decoder()).
Should these reads also reject all-ones values before caching them or using
command to gate PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261029145703.2185231-12-smadhavan@nvidia.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261029145703.2185231-12-smadhavan@nvidia.com
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261029145703.2185231-12-smadhavan@nvidia.com
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105185917.2667656-1-smadhavan@nvidia.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 18:58 [PATCH v17 00/19] PCI/CXL: Add CXL reset support for Type 2 devices Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 18:58 ` [PATCH v17 01/19] cxl: Clarify decoder interleave limit Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 02/19] cxl: Share CXL port upstream PCI device lookup Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 03/19] cxl: Move decoder declarations to shared header Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 04/19] cxl: Embed decoder configuration in a standalone structure Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 05/19] cxl: Introduce endpoint HDM decoder settings Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 06/19] cxl: Move HDM decoder helpers to built-in code Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 07/19] cxl: Share HDM decoder register unpacking Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 08/19] cxl: Move cxl_rwsem into built-in code Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 09/19] cxl: Refresh cached PCI HDM decoder settings Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 10/19] cxl: Build register block helpers into the kernel Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 11/19] PCI/CXL: Cache endpoint HDM state during PCI enumeration Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 12/19] PCI/CXL: Add CXL Device Reset sequencing Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 13/19] cxl: Validate and synchronize HDM ranges around reset Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 14/19] PCI/CXL: Reject reset with unsafe function scope Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 15/19] PCI/CXL: Restore CXL state after PCI reset Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 16/19] PCI/CXL: Expose CXL Reset as a PCI reset method Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 17/19] PCI/CXL: Restore CXL state after CXL bus reset Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 18/19] PCI/CXL: Flush host and device caches for " Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 18:59 ` [PATCH v17 19/19] cxl: Add KUnit checks for HDM decoder unpacking Srirangan Madhavan
2026-11-05 19:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 19:31 ` [PATCH v17 00/19] PCI/CXL: Add CXL reset support for Type 2 devices Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-199916@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=smadhavan@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox