From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shameer Kolothum" <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for config-space accesses
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:41:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211365@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112141632.918954-5-skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] vfio/pci: pci_bus_sem lock inversion in config-space FLR under
access_srcu
--
commit 07dee5e58e5bbc760b7e991d4fc5ab36537fd5e0
Author: Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
vfio/pci: Use access ops for config-space accesses
This commit runs PCI config-space accesses through vfio_pci_core_access(),
routes power-state transitions through vfio_pci_access_ops, and defers
PCI_PM_CTRL D0 transitions until after leaving access_srcu.
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index 9914f3ac69aef..1e54e2e8b2ef8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1957,11 +2017,21 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_config_rw_single(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> if (copy_from_user(&val, buf, count))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - ret = perm->writefn(vdev, *ppos, count, perm, offset, val);
> + access.val = val;
> + ret = vfio_pci_core_access(vdev, vfio_pci_access_config, &access);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (access.power_up) {
> + int err = vfio_lock_and_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Can a config-space FLR write in vfio_exp_config_write() or
vfio_af_config_write() invert the lock order between access_srcu and
pci_bus_sem when the device is in a low-power state?
vfio_pm_config_write() defers D0 transitions outside access_srcu so that
pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() does not block on pci_bus_sem while AER waits
for access_srcu readers. However, if userspace puts the device into
D1-D3hot via PCI_PM_CTRL and then writes PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR or
PCI_AF_CTRL_FLR, vfio_pci_core_access() runs the handler inside
access_srcu, where it takes vdev->memory_lock and calls
pci_try_reset_function():
drivers/pci/pci.c:pci_dev_save_and_disable() {
...
pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D0);
...
}
pci_set_power_state() calls pci_set_full_power_state(dev, false) ->
pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() -> down_read(&pci_bus_sem) while holding both
access_srcu and vdev->memory_lock:
CPU0 CPU1 (AER recovery)
---- -------------------
down_read(&pci_bus_sem)
vfio_pci_config_rw_single()
vfio_pci_core_access()
srcu_read_lock(&access_srcu)
...
vfio_exp_config_write()
down_write(&memory_lock)
pci_try_reset_function()
...
down_read(&pci_bus_sem)
synchronize_srcu(&access_srcu)
*** DEADLOCK ***
(if a writer is queued on pci_bus_sem, or against any path nesting
pci_bus_sem -> access_srcu / memory_lock)
In addition, letting pci_dev_save_and_disable() perform the D3hot -> D0
transition directly bypasses vfio_pci_try_set_power_state() and skips
restoring vdev->pm_save on NoSoftRst- devices.
Calling vfio_pci_try_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0) before
pci_try_reset_function() in vfio_exp_config_write() and
vfio_af_config_write() (as commit 358432f8bbe9 ("vfio/pci: Avoid waiting
for the bus lock when preparing D0") did for vfio_pci_ioctl_reset()), or
deferring the FLR outside access_srcu, would avoid this.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112141632.918954-1-skolothumtho@nvidia.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 14:16 [RFC PATCH v3 00/20] vfio/pci: Handle PCI error recovery and report state to userspace Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/20] vfio/pci: Add SRCU-protected access ops Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/20] PCI/PM: Add a power-state helper that tries the bus lock Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/20] vfio/pci: Avoid waiting for the bus lock when preparing D0 Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for config-space accesses Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/20] vfio/pci: Buffer ROM reads before copying to userspace Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for BAR and ROM accesses Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops when mapping BAR pages Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for hardware IRQ operations Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for function reset Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for runtime-PM requests Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for hardware information queries Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for DMA-BUF export and restoration Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/20] vfio/pci: Track PCI recovery state Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/20] vfio/pci: Add INTx recovery operations Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for SR-IOV configuration and shared reset Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/20] vfio/pci: Restore device state from slot_reset() Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/20] vfio/pci: Complete recovery in resume() Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/20] vfio/pci: Block device access during host recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 15:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/20] vfio/pci: Add VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_PCI_ERROR_RECOVERY Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/20] vfio/pci: Enable recovery for supported native PCIe endpoints Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 15:10 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211365@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox