From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 8/8] perf/x86/intel: Prevent drain_pebs() reentry
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:11:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10abc792-cf41-477e-9864-66145747da2f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812151827.GO776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 8/12/2026 11:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 06:00:43PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
>
>>> So what specific callchain is going sideways?
>> But for the helper __intel_pmu_pebs_disable(), it seems the whole PMU is
>> not disabled, only the target counter has been stopped. Here is one call-chain.
>>
>> __perf_addr_filters_adjust()
>> perf_event_stop()
>> __perf_event_stop()
>> x86_pmu_stop() (event->pmu->stop)
>> intel_pmu_disable_event()
>> intel_pmu_pebs_disable()
>> __intel_pmu_pebs_disable()
>> intel_pmu_drain_large_pebs()
>> intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer()
>>
> Right, so that needs to be included in the changelog. Also, lets target
> that more specifically.
Sure.
>
> How about something like so?
It looks good to me. Would post a new version. Thanks.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index db92ded774dd..e092ef6e37f4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3125,6 +3125,27 @@ static void intel_pmu_del_event(struct perf_event *event)
> this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events)->n_late_setup--;
> }
>
> +int __intel_pmu_quiesce(void)
> +{
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> + int pmu_enabled = cpuc->enabled;
> +
> + cpuc->enabled = 0;
> + if (pmu_enabled)
> + intel_pmu_disable_all();
> +
> + return pmu_enabled;
> +}
> +
> +void __intel_pmu_resume(bool pmu_enabled)
> +{
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> +
> + cpuc->enabled = pmu_enabled;
> + if (pmu_enabled)
> + intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
> +}
> +
> static int icl_set_topdown_event_period(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> @@ -3316,16 +3337,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_read_event(struct perf_event *event)
> if (event->hw.flags & (PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD | PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) ||
> is_pebs_counter_event_group(event)) {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> - bool pmu_enabled = cpuc->enabled;
> + int pmu_enabled;
>
> /* Only need to call update_topdown_event() once for group read. */
> if (is_metric_event(event) && (cpuc->txn_flags & PERF_PMU_TXN_READ))
> return;
>
> - cpuc->enabled = 0;
> - if (pmu_enabled)
> - intel_pmu_disable_all();
> -
> + pmu_enabled = __intel_pmu_quiesce();
> /*
> * If the PEBS counters snapshotting is enabled,
> * the topdown event is available in PEBS records.
> @@ -3334,10 +3352,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_read_event(struct perf_event *event)
> static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(event, NULL);
> else
> intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer();
> -
> - cpuc->enabled = pmu_enabled;
> - if (pmu_enabled)
> - intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
> + __intel_pmu_resume(pmu_enabled);
>
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> index e86e4ba91e1b..54890dda0589 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> @@ -1242,8 +1242,11 @@ int intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer(void)
>
> void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer(void)
> {
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> struct perf_sample_data data;
>
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->enabled);
> +
> static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(NULL, &data);
> }
>
> @@ -1864,8 +1867,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_pebs_via_pt_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> static inline void intel_pmu_drain_large_pebs(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
> {
> if (cpuc->n_pebs == cpuc->n_large_pebs &&
> - cpuc->n_pebs != cpuc->n_pebs_via_pt)
> + cpuc->n_pebs != cpuc->n_pebs_via_pt) {
> + int enabled = __intel_pmu_quiesce();
> intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer();
> + __intel_pmu_resume(enabled);
> + }
> }
>
> static void __intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index 8c0b32ffab35..c7848c4cabae 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -1644,6 +1644,9 @@ static __always_inline void __intel_pmu_lbr_disable(void)
> wrmsrq(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, debugctl);
> }
>
> +extern int __intel_pmu_quiesce(void);
> +extern void __intel_pmu_resume(bool pmu_enabled);
> +
> int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event);
>
> struct event_constraint *
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 8:03 [Patch v3 0/8] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes and optimizations Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 1/8] perf/x86: Unregister PMI handler on PMU init failure Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 8:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 1:17 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 2/8] perf/x86: Free hybrid state " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 3/8] perf/x86: Guard intel_pmu_cpu_dead() against invalid hybrid PMU casts Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 1:30 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Unwind cpuc state if PEBS buffer setup fails Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 5/8] perf/x86: Remove stale fixed counter helper and fix hybrid PMU access Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix intel_cap handling on hybrid PMUs Dapeng Mi
2026-08-10 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-10 12:25 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 7/8] perf/x86: Optimize ACR handling in match_prev_assignment() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 8:03 ` [Patch v3 8/8] perf/x86/intel: Prevent drain_pebs() reentry Dapeng Mi
2026-07-17 10:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 1:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-08-10 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-11 1:39 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-08-11 8:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-11 10:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-08-12 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-13 1:11 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-07-21 14:58 ` [Patch v3 0/8] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes and optimizations Chen, Zide
2026-08-10 9:06 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10abc792-cf41-477e-9864-66145747da2f@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox