* [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2)
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap Namhyung Kim
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
Hello,
This is to support the unprivileged BPF filter for profiling per-task events.
Until now only root (or any user with CAP_BPF) can use the filter and we
cannot add a new unprivileged BPF program types. After talking with the BPF
folks at LSF/MM/BPF 2024, I was told that this is the way to go. Finally I
managed to make it working with pinned BPF objects. :)
v2 changes)
* rebased onto Ian's UID/GID (non-sample data based) filter term change
* support separate lost counts for each use case
* update the test case to allow normal users (if supported)
This only supports the per-task mode for normal users and root still uses
its own instance of the same BPF program - not shared with other users.
But it requires the one-time setup (by root) before using it by normal users
like below.
$ sudo perf record --setup-filter pin
This will load the BPF program and maps and pin them in the BPF-fs. Then
normal users can use the filter.
$ perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB - ]
perf 759982 448227.214189: 1 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
perf 759982 448227.214195: 1 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
perf 759982 448227.214196: 7 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
perf 759982 448227.214196: 223 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
perf 759982 448227.214198: 9475 cycles:u: ffffffff8ee012a0 [unknown] ([unknown])
perf 759982 448227.548608: 1 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
perf 759982 448227.548611: 1 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
perf 759982 448227.548612: 12 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
perf 759982 448227.548613: 466 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
It's also possible to unload (and unpin, of course) using this command:
$ sudo perf record --setup-filter unpin
The code is avaiable in 'perf/pinned-filter-v2' branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
Thanks,
Namhyung
Namhyung Kim (8):
perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap
perf bpf-filter: Pass 'target' to perf_bpf_filter__prepare()
perf bpf-filter: Split per-task filter use case
perf bpf-filter: Support pin/unpin BPF object
perf bpf-filter: Support separate lost counts for each filter
perf record: Fix a potential error handling issue
perf record: Add --setup-filter option
perf test: Update sample filtering test
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 5 +
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 23 +-
tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh | 13 +-
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 406 +++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 19 +-
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h | 2 +
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 75 +++-
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 5 +-
tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 4 +-
tools/perf/util/python.c | 3 +-
13 files changed, 485 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/8] perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf bpf-filter: Pass 'target' to perf_bpf_filter__prepare() Namhyung Kim
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
And the value is now an array. This is to support multiple filter
entries in the map later.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 81 ++++++++++++++------
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 39 +++++-----
3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index 04f98b6bb291..2510832d83f9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -93,71 +93,102 @@ static int check_sample_flags(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *
int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel)
{
- int i, x, y, fd;
+ int i, x, y, fd, ret;
struct sample_filter_bpf *skel;
struct bpf_program *prog;
struct bpf_link *link;
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *expr;
+ struct perf_bpf_filter_entry *entry;
+
+ entry = calloc(MAX_FILTERS, sizeof(*entry));
+ if (entry == NULL)
+ return -1;
skel = sample_filter_bpf__open_and_load();
if (!skel) {
pr_err("Failed to load perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
- return -1;
+ ret = -EPERM;
+ goto err;
}
i = 0;
fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.filters);
list_for_each_entry(expr, &evsel->bpf_filters, list) {
- struct perf_bpf_filter_entry entry = {
- .op = expr->op,
- .part = expr->part,
- .term = expr->term,
- .value = expr->val,
- };
+ if (check_sample_flags(evsel, expr) < 0) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
+ }
- if (check_sample_flags(evsel, expr) < 0)
- return -1;
+ if (i == MAX_FILTERS) {
+ ret = -E2BIG;
+ goto err;
+ }
- bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &entry, BPF_ANY);
+ entry[i].op = expr->op;
+ entry[i].part = expr->part;
+ entry[i].term = expr->term;
+ entry[i].value = expr->val;
i++;
if (expr->op == PBF_OP_GROUP_BEGIN) {
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *group;
list_for_each_entry(group, &expr->groups, list) {
- struct perf_bpf_filter_entry group_entry = {
- .op = group->op,
- .part = group->part,
- .term = group->term,
- .value = group->val,
- };
- bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &group_entry, BPF_ANY);
+ if (i == MAX_FILTERS) {
+ ret = -E2BIG;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ entry[i].op = group->op;
+ entry[i].part = group->part;
+ entry[i].term = group->term;
+ entry[i].value = group->val;
i++;
}
- memset(&entry, 0, sizeof(entry));
- entry.op = PBF_OP_GROUP_END;
- bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &entry, BPF_ANY);
+ if (i == MAX_FILTERS) {
+ ret = -E2BIG;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ entry[i].op = PBF_OP_GROUP_END;
i++;
}
}
- if (i > MAX_FILTERS) {
- pr_err("Too many filters: %d (max = %d)\n", i, MAX_FILTERS);
- return -1;
+ if (i < MAX_FILTERS) {
+ /* to terminate the loop early */
+ entry[i].op = PBF_OP_DONE;
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ /* The filters map has only one entry for now */
+ i = 0;
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, entry, BPF_ANY) < 0) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to update the filter map\n");
+ goto err;
}
+
prog = skel->progs.perf_sample_filter;
for (x = 0; x < xyarray__max_x(evsel->core.fd); x++) {
for (y = 0; y < xyarray__max_y(evsel->core.fd); y++) {
link = bpf_program__attach_perf_event(prog, FD(evsel, x, y));
if (IS_ERR(link)) {
pr_err("Failed to attach perf sample-filter program\n");
- return PTR_ERR(link);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(link);
+ goto err;
}
}
}
+ free(entry);
evsel->bpf_skel = skel;
return 0;
+
+err:
+ free(entry);
+ sample_filter_bpf__destroy(skel);
+ return ret;
}
int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
index 350efa121026..bb6a1b91f1df 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ enum perf_bpf_filter_op {
PBF_OP_AND,
PBF_OP_GROUP_BEGIN,
PBF_OP_GROUP_END,
+ PBF_OP_DONE,
};
enum perf_bpf_filter_term {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
index f59985101973..0d56e52b922c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@
/* BPF map that will be filled by user space */
struct filters {
- __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
__type(key, int);
- __type(value, struct perf_bpf_filter_entry);
- __uint(max_entries, MAX_FILTERS);
+ __type(value, struct perf_bpf_filter_entry[MAX_FILTERS]);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
} filters SEC(".maps");
int dropped;
@@ -179,39 +179,39 @@ int perf_sample_filter(void *ctx)
__u64 sample_data;
int in_group = 0;
int group_result = 0;
- int i;
+ int i, k;
kctx = bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(ctx);
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_FILTERS; i++) {
- int key = i; /* needed for verifier :( */
+ k = 0;
+ entry = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&filters, &k);
+ if (entry == NULL)
+ goto drop;
- entry = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&filters, &key);
- if (entry == NULL)
- break;
- sample_data = perf_get_sample(kctx, entry);
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_FILTERS; i++) {
+ sample_data = perf_get_sample(kctx, &entry[i]);
- switch (entry->op) {
+ switch (entry[i].op) {
case PBF_OP_EQ:
- CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, ==, entry->value)
+ CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, ==, entry[i].value)
break;
case PBF_OP_NEQ:
- CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, !=, entry->value)
+ CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, !=, entry[i].value)
break;
case PBF_OP_GT:
- CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, >, entry->value)
+ CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, >, entry[i].value)
break;
case PBF_OP_GE:
- CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, >=, entry->value)
+ CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, >=, entry[i].value)
break;
case PBF_OP_LT:
- CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, <, entry->value)
+ CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, <, entry[i].value)
break;
case PBF_OP_LE:
- CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, <=, entry->value)
+ CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, <=, entry[i].value)
break;
case PBF_OP_AND:
- CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, &, entry->value)
+ CHECK_RESULT(sample_data, &, entry[i].value)
break;
case PBF_OP_GROUP_BEGIN:
in_group = 1;
@@ -222,6 +222,9 @@ int perf_sample_filter(void *ctx)
goto drop;
in_group = 0;
break;
+ case PBF_OP_DONE:
+ /* no failures so far, accept it */
+ return 1;
}
}
/* generate sample data */
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/8] perf bpf-filter: Pass 'target' to perf_bpf_filter__prepare()
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf bpf-filter: Split per-task filter use case Namhyung Kim
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
This is needed to prepare target-specific actions in the later patch.
We want to reuse the pinned BPF program and map for regular users to
profile their own processes.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 6 ++++--
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 5 +++--
tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 4 +++-
tools/perf/util/python.c | 3 ++-
9 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 019305b94e5f..e855a7688008 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ static int record__open(struct record *rec)
"even with a suitable vmlinux or kallsyms file.\n\n");
}
- if (evlist__apply_filters(evlist, &pos)) {
+ if (evlist__apply_filters(evlist, &pos, &opts->target)) {
pr_err("failed to set filter \"%s\" on event %s with %d (%s)\n",
pos->filter ?: "BPF", evsel__name(pos), errno,
str_error_r(errno, msg, sizeof(msg)));
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
index 661832756a24..1f92445f7480 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv, int run_idx)
return -1;
}
- if (evlist__apply_filters(evsel_list, &counter)) {
+ if (evlist__apply_filters(evsel_list, &counter, &target)) {
pr_err("failed to set filter \"%s\" on event %s with %d (%s)\n",
counter->filter, evsel__name(counter), errno,
str_error_r(errno, msg, sizeof(msg)));
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
index e8cbbf10d361..d1a06a88d693 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int perf_top__start_counters(struct perf_top *top)
}
}
- if (evlist__apply_filters(evlist, &counter)) {
+ if (evlist__apply_filters(evlist, &counter, &opts->target)) {
pr_err("failed to set filter \"%s\" on event %s with %d (%s)\n",
counter->filter ?: "BPF", evsel__name(counter), errno,
str_error_r(errno, msg, sizeof(msg)));
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
index c42bc608954e..0f93ba83717d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
@@ -3959,7 +3959,7 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
err = trace__expand_filters(trace, &evsel);
if (err)
goto out_delete_evlist;
- err = evlist__apply_filters(evlist, &evsel);
+ err = evlist__apply_filters(evlist, &evsel, &trace->opts.target);
if (err < 0)
goto out_error_apply_filters;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index 2510832d83f9..0b2eca56aa10 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int check_sample_flags(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *
return -1;
}
-int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel)
+int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target __maybe_unused)
{
int i, x, y, fd, ret;
struct sample_filter_bpf *skel;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
index cd6764442c16..605a3d0226e0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct perf_bpf_filter_expr {
};
struct evsel;
+struct target;
#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(enum perf_bpf_filter_term term,
@@ -23,7 +24,7 @@ struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(enum perf_bpf_filter_term
enum perf_bpf_filter_op op,
unsigned long val);
int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head, const char *str);
-int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel);
+int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target);
int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel);
u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel);
@@ -34,7 +35,8 @@ static inline int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head __maybe_unu
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
-static inline int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused)
+static inline int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused,
+ struct target *target __maybe_unused)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index 3a719edafc7a..1417f9a23083 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -1086,7 +1086,8 @@ int evlist__create_maps(struct evlist *evlist, struct target *target)
return -1;
}
-int evlist__apply_filters(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel **err_evsel)
+int evlist__apply_filters(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel **err_evsel,
+ struct target *target)
{
struct evsel *evsel;
int err = 0;
@@ -1108,7 +1109,7 @@ int evlist__apply_filters(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel **err_evsel)
* non-tracepoint events can have BPF filters.
*/
if (!list_empty(&evsel->bpf_filters)) {
- err = perf_bpf_filter__prepare(evsel);
+ err = perf_bpf_filter__prepare(evsel, target);
if (err) {
*err_evsel = evsel;
break;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
index cb91dc9117a2..cccc34da5a02 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct pollfd;
struct thread_map;
struct perf_cpu_map;
struct record_opts;
+struct target;
/*
* State machine of bkw_mmap_state:
@@ -212,7 +213,8 @@ void evlist__enable_non_dummy(struct evlist *evlist);
void evlist__set_selected(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel *evsel);
int evlist__create_maps(struct evlist *evlist, struct target *target);
-int evlist__apply_filters(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel **err_evsel);
+int evlist__apply_filters(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel **err_evsel,
+ struct target *target);
u64 __evlist__combined_sample_type(struct evlist *evlist);
u64 evlist__combined_sample_type(struct evlist *evlist);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/python.c b/tools/perf/util/python.c
index 88f98f2772fb..5775c5c1f617 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/python.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/python.c
@@ -178,7 +178,8 @@ int bpf_counter__disable(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused)
// not to drag util/bpf-filter.c
#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
-int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused)
+int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused,
+ struct target *target __maybe_unused)
{
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/8] perf bpf-filter: Split per-task filter use case
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf bpf-filter: Pass 'target' to perf_bpf_filter__prepare() Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf bpf-filter: Support pin/unpin BPF object Namhyung Kim
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
If the target is a list of tasks, it can use a shared hash map for
filter expressions. The key of the filter map is an integer index like
in an array. A separate pid_hash map is added to get the index for the
filter map using the tgid.
For system-wide mode including per-cpu or per-user targets are handled
by the single entry map like before.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 186 +++++++++++++++----
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 21 +++
3 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index 0b2eca56aa10..5ec0e0955ec4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -3,10 +3,13 @@
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <api/fs/fs.h>
#include <internal/xyarray.h>
+#include <perf/threadmap.h>
#include "util/debug.h"
#include "util/evsel.h"
+#include "util/target.h"
#include "util/bpf-filter.h"
#include <util/bpf-filter-flex.h>
@@ -91,38 +94,17 @@ static int check_sample_flags(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *
return -1;
}
-int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target __maybe_unused)
+static int get_filter_entries(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_bpf_filter_entry *entry)
{
- int i, x, y, fd, ret;
- struct sample_filter_bpf *skel;
- struct bpf_program *prog;
- struct bpf_link *link;
+ int i = 0;
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *expr;
- struct perf_bpf_filter_entry *entry;
-
- entry = calloc(MAX_FILTERS, sizeof(*entry));
- if (entry == NULL)
- return -1;
-
- skel = sample_filter_bpf__open_and_load();
- if (!skel) {
- pr_err("Failed to load perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
- ret = -EPERM;
- goto err;
- }
- i = 0;
- fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.filters);
list_for_each_entry(expr, &evsel->bpf_filters, list) {
- if (check_sample_flags(evsel, expr) < 0) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (check_sample_flags(evsel, expr) < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
- if (i == MAX_FILTERS) {
- ret = -E2BIG;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (i == MAX_FILTERS)
+ return -E2BIG;
entry[i].op = expr->op;
entry[i].part = expr->part;
@@ -134,10 +116,8 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target __maybe_
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *group;
list_for_each_entry(group, &expr->groups, list) {
- if (i == MAX_FILTERS) {
- ret = -E2BIG;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (i == MAX_FILTERS)
+ return -E2BIG;
entry[i].op = group->op;
entry[i].part = group->part;
@@ -146,10 +126,8 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target __maybe_
i++;
}
- if (i == MAX_FILTERS) {
- ret = -E2BIG;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (i == MAX_FILTERS)
+ return -E2BIG;
entry[i].op = PBF_OP_GROUP_END;
i++;
@@ -161,15 +139,143 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target __maybe_
entry[i].op = PBF_OP_DONE;
i++;
}
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int convert_to_tgid(int tid)
+{
+ char path[128];
+ char *buf, *p, *q;
+ int tgid;
+ size_t len;
+
+ scnprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%d/status", tid);
+ if (procfs__read_str(path, &buf, &len) < 0)
+ return -1;
- /* The filters map has only one entry for now */
- i = 0;
- if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, entry, BPF_ANY) < 0) {
- ret = -errno;
- pr_err("Failed to update the filter map\n");
+ p = strstr(buf, "Tgid:");
+ if (p == NULL) {
+ free(buf);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ tgid = strtol(p + 6, &q, 0);
+ free(buf);
+ if (*q != '\n')
+ return -1;
+
+ return tgid;
+}
+
+static int update_pid_hash(struct sample_filter_bpf *skel, struct evsel *evsel,
+ struct perf_bpf_filter_entry *entry)
+{
+ int filter_idx;
+ int nr, last;
+ int fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.filters);
+ struct perf_thread_map *threads;
+
+ /* Find the first available entry in the filters map */
+ for (filter_idx = 0; filter_idx < MAX_FILTERS; filter_idx++) {
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &filter_idx, entry, BPF_NOEXIST) == 0)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (filter_idx == MAX_FILTERS) {
+ pr_err("Too many users for the filter map\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ threads = perf_evsel__threads(&evsel->core);
+ if (threads == NULL) {
+ pr_err("Cannot get the thread list of the event\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* save the index to a hash map */
+ fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.pid_hash);
+
+ last = -1;
+ nr = perf_thread_map__nr(threads);
+ for (int i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
+ int pid = perf_thread_map__pid(threads, i);
+ int tgid;
+
+ /* it actually needs tgid, let's get tgid from /proc. */
+ tgid = convert_to_tgid(pid);
+ if (tgid < 0) {
+ /* the thread may be dead, ignore. */
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (tgid == last)
+ continue;
+ last = tgid;
+
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &tgid, &filter_idx, BPF_ANY) < 0) {
+ pr_err("Failed to update the pid hash\n");
+ return -errno;
+ }
+ pr_debug("pid hash: %d -> %d\n", tgid, filter_idx);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target)
+{
+ int i, x, y, fd, ret;
+ struct sample_filter_bpf *skel = NULL;
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ struct perf_bpf_filter_entry *entry;
+ bool needs_pid_hash = !target__has_cpu(target) && !target->uid_str;
+
+ entry = calloc(MAX_FILTERS, sizeof(*entry));
+ if (entry == NULL)
+ return -1;
+
+ ret = get_filter_entries(evsel, entry);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ pr_err("Failed to process filter entries\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ skel = sample_filter_bpf__open();
+ if (!skel) {
+ pr_err("Failed to open perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
+ ret = -EPERM;
goto err;
}
+ if (needs_pid_hash) {
+ bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.filters, MAX_FILTERS);
+ bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.pid_hash, MAX_PIDS);
+ skel->rodata->use_pid_hash = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (sample_filter_bpf__load(skel) < 0) {
+ pr_err("Failed to load perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
+ ret = -EPERM;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (needs_pid_hash) {
+ /* The filters map is shared among other processes */
+ ret = update_pid_hash(skel, evsel, entry);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err;
+ } else {
+ i = 0;
+ fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.filters);
+
+ /* The filters map has only one entry in this case */
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, entry, BPF_ANY) < 0) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to update the filter map\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+
prog = skel->progs.perf_sample_filter;
for (x = 0; x < xyarray__max_x(evsel->core.fd); x++) {
for (y = 0; y < xyarray__max_y(evsel->core.fd); y++) {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
index bb6a1b91f1df..e666bfd5fbdd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#define PERF_UTIL_BPF_SKEL_SAMPLE_FILTER_H
#define MAX_FILTERS 64
+#define MAX_PIDS (16 * 1024)
/* supported filter operations */
enum perf_bpf_filter_op {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
index 0d56e52b922c..c5273f06fa45 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
@@ -15,7 +15,16 @@ struct filters {
__uint(max_entries, 1);
} filters SEC(".maps");
+/* tgid to filter index */
+struct pid_hash {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, int);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+} pid_hash SEC(".maps");
+
int dropped;
+volatile const int use_pid_hash;
void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *) __ksym;
@@ -184,6 +193,18 @@ int perf_sample_filter(void *ctx)
kctx = bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(ctx);
k = 0;
+
+ if (use_pid_hash) {
+ int tgid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+ int *idx;
+
+ idx = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&pid_hash, &tgid);
+ if (idx)
+ k = *idx;
+ else
+ goto drop;
+ }
+
entry = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&filters, &k);
if (entry == NULL)
goto drop;
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/8] perf bpf-filter: Support pin/unpin BPF object
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf bpf-filter: Split per-task filter use case Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf bpf-filter: Support separate lost counts for each filter Namhyung Kim
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
And use the pinned objects for unprivileged users to profile their own
tasks. The BPF objects need to be pinned in the BPF-fs by root first
and it'll be handled in the later patch.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 13 ++
2 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index 5ec0e0955ec4..37ed6c48debf 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
@@ -23,6 +26,9 @@
#define __PERF_SAMPLE_TYPE(tt, st, opt) { tt, #st, opt }
#define PERF_SAMPLE_TYPE(_st, opt) __PERF_SAMPLE_TYPE(PBF_TERM_##_st, PERF_SAMPLE_##_st, opt)
+/* Index in the pinned 'filters' map. Should be released after use. */
+static int pinned_filter_idx = -1;
+
static const struct perf_sample_info {
enum perf_bpf_filter_term type;
const char *name;
@@ -47,6 +53,8 @@ static const struct perf_sample_info {
PERF_SAMPLE_TYPE(DATA_PAGE_SIZE, "--data-page-size"),
};
+static int get_pinned_fd(const char *name);
+
static const struct perf_sample_info *get_sample_info(enum perf_bpf_filter_term type)
{
size_t i;
@@ -167,19 +175,26 @@ static int convert_to_tgid(int tid)
return tgid;
}
-static int update_pid_hash(struct sample_filter_bpf *skel, struct evsel *evsel,
- struct perf_bpf_filter_entry *entry)
+static int update_pid_hash(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_bpf_filter_entry *entry)
{
int filter_idx;
- int nr, last;
- int fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.filters);
+ int fd, nr, last;
struct perf_thread_map *threads;
+ fd = get_pinned_fd("filters");
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ pr_debug("cannot get fd for 'filters' map\n");
+ return fd;
+ }
+
/* Find the first available entry in the filters map */
for (filter_idx = 0; filter_idx < MAX_FILTERS; filter_idx++) {
- if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &filter_idx, entry, BPF_NOEXIST) == 0)
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &filter_idx, entry, BPF_NOEXIST) == 0) {
+ pinned_filter_idx = filter_idx;
break;
+ }
}
+ close(fd);
if (filter_idx == MAX_FILTERS) {
pr_err("Too many users for the filter map\n");
@@ -193,7 +208,9 @@ static int update_pid_hash(struct sample_filter_bpf *skel, struct evsel *evsel,
}
/* save the index to a hash map */
- fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.pid_hash);
+ fd = get_pinned_fd("pid_hash");
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return fd;
last = -1;
nr = perf_thread_map__nr(threads);
@@ -214,10 +231,12 @@ static int update_pid_hash(struct sample_filter_bpf *skel, struct evsel *evsel,
if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &tgid, &filter_idx, BPF_ANY) < 0) {
pr_err("Failed to update the pid hash\n");
- return -errno;
+ close(fd);
+ return -1;
}
pr_debug("pid hash: %d -> %d\n", tgid, filter_idx);
}
+ close(fd);
return 0;
}
@@ -240,40 +259,48 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target)
goto err;
}
- skel = sample_filter_bpf__open();
- if (!skel) {
- pr_err("Failed to open perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
- ret = -EPERM;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (needs_pid_hash && geteuid() != 0) {
+ /* The filters map is shared among other processes */
+ ret = update_pid_hash(evsel, entry);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err;
- if (needs_pid_hash) {
- bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.filters, MAX_FILTERS);
- bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.pid_hash, MAX_PIDS);
- skel->rodata->use_pid_hash = 1;
+ fd = get_pinned_fd("perf_sample_filter");
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ ret = fd;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ for (x = 0; x < xyarray__max_x(evsel->core.fd); x++) {
+ for (y = 0; y < xyarray__max_y(evsel->core.fd); y++) {
+ ret = ioctl(FD(evsel, x, y), PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF, fd);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ pr_err("Failed to attach perf sample-filter\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ close(fd);
+ free(entry);
+ return 0;
}
- if (sample_filter_bpf__load(skel) < 0) {
+ skel = sample_filter_bpf__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel) {
+ ret = -errno;
pr_err("Failed to load perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
- ret = -EPERM;
goto err;
}
- if (needs_pid_hash) {
- /* The filters map is shared among other processes */
- ret = update_pid_hash(skel, evsel, entry);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto err;
- } else {
- i = 0;
- fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.filters);
-
- /* The filters map has only one entry in this case */
- if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, entry, BPF_ANY) < 0) {
- ret = -errno;
- pr_err("Failed to update the filter map\n");
- goto err;
- }
+ i = 0;
+ fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.filters);
+
+ /* The filters map has only one entry in this case */
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, entry, BPF_ANY) < 0) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to update the filter map\n");
+ goto err;
}
prog = skel->progs.perf_sample_filter;
@@ -306,6 +333,15 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel)
free(expr);
}
sample_filter_bpf__destroy(evsel->bpf_skel);
+
+ if (pinned_filter_idx >= 0) {
+ int fd = get_pinned_fd("filters");
+
+ bpf_map_delete_elem(fd, &pinned_filter_idx);
+ pinned_filter_idx = -1;
+ close(fd);
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -349,3 +385,129 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head, const char *str)
return ret;
}
+
+int perf_bpf_filter__pin(void)
+{
+ struct sample_filter_bpf *skel;
+ char *path = NULL;
+ int dir_fd, ret = -1;
+
+ skel = sample_filter_bpf__open();
+ if (!skel) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to open perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* pinned program will use pid-hash */
+ bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.filters, MAX_FILTERS);
+ bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.pid_hash, MAX_PIDS);
+ skel->rodata->use_pid_hash = 1;
+
+ if (sample_filter_bpf__load(skel) < 0) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to load perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (asprintf(&path, "%s/fs/bpf/%s", sysfs__mountpoint(),
+ PERF_BPF_FILTER_PIN_PATH) < 0) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to allocate pathname in the BPF-fs\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = bpf_object__pin(skel->obj, path);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ pr_err("Failed to pin BPF filter objects\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* setup access permissions for the pinned objects */
+ dir_fd = open(path, O_PATH);
+ if (dir_fd < 0) {
+ bpf_object__unpin(skel->obj, path);
+ ret = dir_fd;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* BPF-fs root has the sticky bit */
+ if (fchmodat(dir_fd, "..", 01755, 0) < 0) {
+ pr_debug("chmod for BPF-fs failed\n");
+ ret = -errno;
+ goto err_close;
+ }
+
+ /* perf_filter directory */
+ if (fchmodat(dir_fd, ".", 0755, 0) < 0) {
+ pr_debug("chmod for perf_filter directory failed?\n");
+ ret = -errno;
+ goto err_close;
+ }
+
+ /* programs need write permission for some reason */
+ if (fchmodat(dir_fd, "perf_sample_filter", 0777, 0) < 0) {
+ pr_debug("chmod for perf_sample_filter failed\n");
+ ret = -errno;
+ }
+ /* maps */
+ if (fchmodat(dir_fd, "filters", 0666, 0) < 0) {
+ pr_debug("chmod for filters failed\n");
+ ret = -errno;
+ }
+ if (fchmodat(dir_fd, "pid_hash", 0666, 0) < 0) {
+ pr_debug("chmod for pid_hash failed\n");
+ ret = -errno;
+ }
+
+err_close:
+ close(dir_fd);
+
+err:
+ free(path);
+ sample_filter_bpf__destroy(skel);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int perf_bpf_filter__unpin(void)
+{
+ struct sample_filter_bpf *skel;
+ char *path = NULL;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ skel = sample_filter_bpf__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to open perf sample-filter BPF skeleton\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (asprintf(&path, "%s/fs/bpf/%s", sysfs__mountpoint(),
+ PERF_BPF_FILTER_PIN_PATH) < 0) {
+ ret = -errno;
+ pr_err("Failed to allocate pathname in the BPF-fs\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = bpf_object__unpin(skel->obj, path);
+
+err:
+ free(path);
+ sample_filter_bpf__destroy(skel);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int get_pinned_fd(const char *name)
+{
+ char *path = NULL;
+ int fd;
+
+ if (asprintf(&path, "%s/fs/bpf/%s/%s", sysfs__mountpoint(),
+ PERF_BPF_FILTER_PIN_PATH, name) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ fd = bpf_obj_get(path);
+
+ free(path);
+ return fd;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
index 605a3d0226e0..916ed7770b73 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ struct perf_bpf_filter_expr {
struct evsel;
struct target;
+/* path in BPF-fs for the pinned program and maps */
+#define PERF_BPF_FILTER_PIN_PATH "perf_filter"
+
#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(enum perf_bpf_filter_term term,
int part,
@@ -27,6 +30,8 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head, const char *str);
int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target);
int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel);
u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel);
+int perf_bpf_filter__pin(void);
+int perf_bpf_filter__unpin(void);
#else /* !HAVE_BPF_SKEL */
@@ -48,5 +53,13 @@ static inline u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused
{
return 0;
}
+static inline int perf_bpf_filter__pin(void)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+static inline int perf_bpf_filter__unpin(void)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
#endif /* HAVE_BPF_SKEL*/
#endif /* PERF_UTIL_BPF_FILTER_H */
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/8] perf bpf-filter: Support separate lost counts for each filter
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf bpf-filter: Support pin/unpin BPF object Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf record: Fix a potential error handling issue Namhyung Kim
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
As the BPF filter is shared between other processes, it should have its
own counter for each invocation. Add a new array map (lost_count) to
save the count using the same index as the filter. It should clear the
count before running the filter.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 15 ++++++--
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index 37ed6c48debf..c5eb0b7eec19 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -260,11 +260,23 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target)
}
if (needs_pid_hash && geteuid() != 0) {
+ int zero = 0;
+
/* The filters map is shared among other processes */
ret = update_pid_hash(evsel, entry);
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
+ fd = get_pinned_fd("dropped");
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ ret = fd;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* Reset the lost count */
+ bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &pinned_filter_idx, &zero, BPF_ANY);
+ close(fd);
+
fd = get_pinned_fd("perf_sample_filter");
if (fd < 0) {
ret = fd;
@@ -347,9 +359,25 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel)
u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel)
{
- struct sample_filter_bpf *skel = evsel->bpf_skel;
+ int count = 0;
+
+ if (list_empty(&evsel->bpf_filters))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (pinned_filter_idx >= 0) {
+ int fd = get_pinned_fd("dropped");
+
+ bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &pinned_filter_idx, &count);
+ close(fd);
+ } else if (evsel->bpf_skel) {
+ struct sample_filter_bpf *skel = evsel->bpf_skel;
+ int fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.dropped);
+ int idx = 0;
- return skel ? skel->bss->dropped : 0;
+ bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &idx, &count);
+ }
+
+ return count;
}
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(enum perf_bpf_filter_term term,
@@ -402,6 +430,7 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__pin(void)
/* pinned program will use pid-hash */
bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.filters, MAX_FILTERS);
bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.pid_hash, MAX_PIDS);
+ bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.dropped, MAX_FILTERS);
skel->rodata->use_pid_hash = 1;
if (sample_filter_bpf__load(skel) < 0) {
@@ -459,6 +488,10 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__pin(void)
pr_debug("chmod for pid_hash failed\n");
ret = -errno;
}
+ if (fchmodat(dir_fd, "dropped", 0666, 0) < 0) {
+ pr_debug("chmod for dropped failed\n");
+ ret = -errno;
+ }
err_close:
close(dir_fd);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
index c5273f06fa45..4c75354b84fd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
@@ -23,7 +23,14 @@ struct pid_hash {
__uint(max_entries, 1);
} pid_hash SEC(".maps");
-int dropped;
+/* tgid to filter index */
+struct lost_count {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, int);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+} dropped SEC(".maps");
+
volatile const int use_pid_hash;
void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *) __ksym;
@@ -189,6 +196,7 @@ int perf_sample_filter(void *ctx)
int in_group = 0;
int group_result = 0;
int i, k;
+ int *losts;
kctx = bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(ctx);
@@ -252,7 +260,10 @@ int perf_sample_filter(void *ctx)
return 1;
drop:
- __sync_fetch_and_add(&dropped, 1);
+ losts = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&dropped, &k);
+ if (losts != NULL)
+ __sync_fetch_and_add(losts, 1);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6/8] perf record: Fix a potential error handling issue
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf bpf-filter: Support separate lost counts for each filter Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf record: Add --setup-filter option Namhyung Kim
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
The evlist is allocated at the beginning of cmd_record(). Also free-ing
thread masks should be paired with record__init_thread_masks() which is
called right before __cmd_record().
Let's change the order of these functions to release the resources
correctly in case of errors. This is maybe fine as the process exits,
but it might be a problem if it manages some system-wide resources that
live longer than the process.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index e855a7688008..a473000f3599 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -4242,13 +4242,13 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
err = __cmd_record(&record, argc, argv);
out:
- evlist__delete(rec->evlist);
+ record__free_thread_masks(rec, rec->nr_threads);
+ rec->nr_threads = 0;
symbol__exit();
auxtrace_record__free(rec->itr);
out_opts:
- record__free_thread_masks(rec, rec->nr_threads);
- rec->nr_threads = 0;
evlist__close_control(rec->opts.ctl_fd, rec->opts.ctl_fd_ack, &rec->opts.ctl_fd_close);
+ evlist__delete(rec->evlist);
return err;
}
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7/8] perf record: Add --setup-filter option
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf record: Fix a potential error handling issue Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf test: Update sample filtering test Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:34 ` [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
To allow BPF filters for unprivileged users it needs to pin the BPF
objects to BPF-fs first. Let's add a new option to pin and unpin the
objects easily. I'm not sure 'perf record' is a right place to do this
but I don't have a better idea right now.
$ sudo perf record --setup-filter pin
The above command would pin BPF program and maps for the filter when the
system has BPF-fs (usually at /sys/fs/bpf/). To unpin the objects,
users can run the following command (as root).
$ sudo perf record --setup-filter unpin
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 5 +++++
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
index d6532ed97c02..41e36b4dc765 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
@@ -828,6 +828,11 @@ filtered through the mask provided by -C option.
only, as of now. So the applications built without the frame
pointer might see bogus addresses.
+--setup-filter=<action>::
+ Prepare BPF filter to be used by regular users. The action should be
+ either "pin" or "unpin". The filter can be used after it's pinned.
+
+
include::intel-hybrid.txt[]
SEE ALSO
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index a473000f3599..e88dedc0391b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ struct record {
bool timestamp_filename;
bool timestamp_boundary;
bool off_cpu;
+ const char *filter_action;
struct switch_output switch_output;
unsigned long long samples;
unsigned long output_max_size; /* = 0: unlimited */
@@ -3557,6 +3558,8 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = {
"write collected trace data into several data files using parallel threads",
record__parse_threads),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "off-cpu", &record.off_cpu, "Enable off-cpu analysis"),
+ OPT_STRING(0, "setup-filter", &record.filter_action, "pin|unpin",
+ "BPF filter action"),
OPT_END()
};
@@ -4086,6 +4089,18 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
pr_warning("WARNING: --timestamp-filename option is not available in parallel streaming mode.\n");
}
+ if (rec->filter_action) {
+ if (!strcmp(rec->filter_action, "pin"))
+ err = perf_bpf_filter__pin();
+ else if (!strcmp(rec->filter_action, "unpin"))
+ err = perf_bpf_filter__unpin();
+ else {
+ pr_warning("Unknown BPF filter action: %s\n", rec->filter_action);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ }
+ goto out_opts;
+ }
+
/*
* Allow aliases to facilitate the lookup of symbols for address
* filters. Refer to auxtrace_parse_filters().
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 8/8] perf test: Update sample filtering test
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf record: Add --setup-filter option Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:34 ` [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users
Now it can run the BPF filtering test with normal user if the BPF
objects are pinned by 'sudo perf record --setup-filter pin'. Let's
update the test case to verify the behavior. It'll skip the test if the
filter check is failed from a normal user, but it shows a message how to
set up the filters.
First, run the test as a normal user and it fails.
$ perf test -vv filtering
95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests:
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 425677
Checking BPF-filter privilege
try 'sudo perf record --setup-filter pin' first. <<<--- here
bpf-filter test [Skipped permission]
---- end(-2) ----
95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests : Skip
According to the message, run the perf record command to pin the BPF
objects.
$ sudo perf record --setup-filter pin
And re-run the test as a normal user.
$ perf test -vv filtering
95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests:
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 424486
Checking BPF-filter privilege
Basic bpf-filter test
Basic bpf-filter test [Success]
Failing bpf-filter test
Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
Failing bpf-filter test [Success]
Group bpf-filter test
Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE
Group bpf-filter test [Success]
---- end(0) ----
95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests : Ok
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh
index 31c593966e8c..c5882d620db7 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh
@@ -22,15 +22,16 @@ trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
test_bpf_filter_priv() {
echo "Checking BPF-filter privilege"
- if [ "$(id -u)" != 0 ]
- then
- echo "bpf-filter test [Skipped permission]"
- err=2
- return
- fi
if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'period > 1' \
-o /dev/null --quiet true 2>&1
then
+ if [ "$(id -u)" != 0 ]
+ then
+ echo "try 'sudo perf record --setup-filter pin' first."
+ echo "bpf-filter test [Skipped permission]"
+ err=2
+ return
+ fi
echo "bpf-filter test [Skipped missing BPF support]"
err=2
return
--
2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2)
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf test: Update sample filtering test Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-06-21 22:34 ` Namhyung Kim
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-06-21 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users, KP Singh, Song Liu, Stephane Eranian, bpf
Ugh, forgot to CC bpf list/folks.. ;-p
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 3:25 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is to support the unprivileged BPF filter for profiling per-task events.
> Until now only root (or any user with CAP_BPF) can use the filter and we
> cannot add a new unprivileged BPF program types. After talking with the BPF
> folks at LSF/MM/BPF 2024, I was told that this is the way to go. Finally I
> managed to make it working with pinned BPF objects. :)
>
> v2 changes)
> * rebased onto Ian's UID/GID (non-sample data based) filter term change
> * support separate lost counts for each use case
> * update the test case to allow normal users (if supported)
>
>
> This only supports the per-task mode for normal users and root still uses
> its own instance of the same BPF program - not shared with other users.
> But it requires the one-time setup (by root) before using it by normal users
> like below.
>
> $ sudo perf record --setup-filter pin
>
> This will load the BPF program and maps and pin them in the BPF-fs. Then
> normal users can use the filter.
>
> $ perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB - ]
> perf 759982 448227.214189: 1 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> perf 759982 448227.214195: 1 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> perf 759982 448227.214196: 7 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> perf 759982 448227.214196: 223 cycles:u: 7f153719f4d0 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> perf 759982 448227.214198: 9475 cycles:u: ffffffff8ee012a0 [unknown] ([unknown])
> perf 759982 448227.548608: 1 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
> perf 759982 448227.548611: 1 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
> perf 759982 448227.548612: 12 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
> perf 759982 448227.548613: 466 cycles:u: 559a9f03c81c noploop+0x5c (/home/namhyung/linux/tools/perf/perf)
>
> It's also possible to unload (and unpin, of course) using this command:
>
> $ sudo perf record --setup-filter unpin
>
> The code is avaiable in 'perf/pinned-filter-v2' branch at
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> Namhyung Kim (8):
> perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap
> perf bpf-filter: Pass 'target' to perf_bpf_filter__prepare()
> perf bpf-filter: Split per-task filter use case
> perf bpf-filter: Support pin/unpin BPF object
> perf bpf-filter: Support separate lost counts for each filter
> perf record: Fix a potential error handling issue
> perf record: Add --setup-filter option
> perf test: Update sample filtering test
>
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 5 +
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 23 +-
> tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh | 13 +-
> tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 406 +++++++++++++++++--
> tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 19 +-
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h | 2 +
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 75 +++-
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 5 +-
> tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 4 +-
> tools/perf/util/python.c | 3 +-
> 13 files changed, 485 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.45.2.741.gdbec12cfda-goog
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-21 22:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-21 22:23 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf bpf-filter: Pass 'target' to perf_bpf_filter__prepare() Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf bpf-filter: Split per-task filter use case Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf bpf-filter: Support pin/unpin BPF object Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf bpf-filter: Support separate lost counts for each filter Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf record: Fix a potential error handling issue Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf record: Add --setup-filter option Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf test: Update sample filtering test Namhyung Kim
2024-06-21 22:34 ` [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Use a pinned BPF program for filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox