* [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 @ 2024-08-06 6:17 Eiichi Tsukata 2024-08-06 6:27 ` Eiichi Tsukata 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Eiichi Tsukata @ 2024-08-06 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, james.clark, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel Cc: Eiichi Tsukata If EXTRA_CFLAGS has "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2", the build fails with: error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Werror=cpp] Use "-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" instead of "-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" for tests built with -O0. Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> --- tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build index 48bf0d3b0f3d..ec36c21e375e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ perf-test-y += sqrtloop.o perf-test-y += brstack.o perf-test-y += datasym.o -CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE +CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE +CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE +CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE +CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -- 2.45.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 2024-08-06 6:17 [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 Eiichi Tsukata @ 2024-08-06 6:27 ` Eiichi Tsukata 2024-08-26 3:04 ` Eiichi Tsukata 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Eiichi Tsukata @ 2024-08-06 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, james.clark@linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, FYI: Fedora uses “RPM_OPT_FLAGS” as “EXTRA_CFLAGS” to build perf. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/rawhide/f/kernel.spec#_2908 And on Fedora40, it has “-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3”. [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --showrc | grep RPM_OPT | head -n 1 RPM_OPT_FLAGS="%{optflags}" [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --eval '%{optflags}' -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mon-omit-leaf-frame-pointer Best, Eiichi > On Aug 6, 2024, at 15:17, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote: > > If EXTRA_CFLAGS has "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2", the build fails with: > > error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Werror=cpp] > > Use "-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" instead of "-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" for tests > built with -O0. > > Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> > --- > tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build > index 48bf0d3b0f3d..ec36c21e375e 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ perf-test-y += sqrtloop.o > perf-test-y += brstack.o > perf-test-y += datasym.o > > -CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > -CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > -CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > -CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > +CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > +CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > +CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > +CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > -- > 2.45.2 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 2024-08-06 6:27 ` Eiichi Tsukata @ 2024-08-26 3:04 ` Eiichi Tsukata 2024-08-26 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Eiichi Tsukata @ 2024-08-26 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, james.clark@linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ping > On Aug 6, 2024, at 15:27, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > FYI: Fedora uses “RPM_OPT_FLAGS” as “EXTRA_CFLAGS” to build perf. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/rawhide/f/kernel.spec#_2908 > > And on Fedora40, it has “-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3”. > > [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --showrc | grep RPM_OPT | head -n 1 > RPM_OPT_FLAGS="%{optflags}" > [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --eval '%{optflags}' > -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mon-omit-leaf-frame-pointer > > Best, > Eiichi > >> On Aug 6, 2024, at 15:17, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote: >> >> If EXTRA_CFLAGS has "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2", the build fails with: >> >> error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Werror=cpp] >> >> Use "-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" instead of "-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" for tests >> built with -O0. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> >> --- >> tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build >> index 48bf0d3b0f3d..ec36c21e375e 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ perf-test-y += sqrtloop.o >> perf-test-y += brstack.o >> perf-test-y += datasym.o >> >> -CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> -CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> -CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> -CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> +CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> +CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> +CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> +CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >> -- >> 2.45.2 >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 2024-08-26 3:04 ` Eiichi Tsukata @ 2024-08-26 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2024-08-27 2:45 ` Eiichi Tsukata 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2024-08-26 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eiichi Tsukata Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, james.clark@linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:04:12AM +0000, Eiichi Tsukata wrote: > Ping Tried, didn't work, can you please check on the tmp.perf-tools-next? ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ b4 am -ctsl --cc-trailers 20240806061749.143072-1-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20240806061749.143072-1-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com/t.mbox.gz Analyzing 3 messages in the thread Looking for additional code-review trailers on lore.kernel.org Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... --- ✓ [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240806061749.143072-1-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com + Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> --- ✓ Signed: DKIM/nutanix.com --- Total patches: 1 --- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240806061749.143072-1-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com Base: not specified git am ./20240806_eiichi_tsukata_perf_test_use_wp_u_fortify_source_for_tests_built_with_o0.mbx ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git am ./20240806_eiichi_tsukata_perf_test_use_wp_u_fortify_source_for_tests_built_with_o0.mbx Applying: perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 error: patch failed: tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build:7 error: tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0001 perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false" ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git am --abort ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ > > On Aug 6, 2024, at 15:27, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > FYI: Fedora uses “RPM_OPT_FLAGS” as “EXTRA_CFLAGS” to build perf. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/rawhide/f/kernel.spec#_2908 > > > > And on Fedora40, it has “-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3”. > > > > [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --showrc | grep RPM_OPT | head -n 1 > > RPM_OPT_FLAGS="%{optflags}" > > [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --eval '%{optflags}' > > -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mon-omit-leaf-frame-pointer > > > > Best, > > Eiichi > > > >> On Aug 6, 2024, at 15:17, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote: > >> > >> If EXTRA_CFLAGS has "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2", the build fails with: > >> > >> error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Werror=cpp] > >> > >> Use "-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" instead of "-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" for tests > >> built with -O0. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> > >> --- > >> tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build | 8 ++++---- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build > >> index 48bf0d3b0f3d..ec36c21e375e 100644 > >> --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build > >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build > >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ perf-test-y += sqrtloop.o > >> perf-test-y += brstack.o > >> perf-test-y += datasym.o > >> > >> -CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> -CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> -CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> -CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> +CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> +CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> +CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> +CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> -- > >> 2.45.2 > >> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 2024-08-26 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2024-08-27 2:45 ` Eiichi Tsukata 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Eiichi Tsukata @ 2024-08-27 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, james.clark@linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Aug 26, 2024, at 23:42, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:04:12AM +0000, Eiichi Tsukata wrote: >> Ping > > Tried, didn't work, can you please check on the tmp.perf-tools-next? > It failed because "perf-test-y += landlock.o” line was added recently. I’ll rebase the patch on tmp.perf-tools-next in v2. Thanks Eiichi > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ b4 am -ctsl --cc-trailers 20240806061749.143072-1-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20240806061749.143072-1-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com/t.mbox.gz > Analyzing 3 messages in the thread > Looking for additional code-review trailers on lore.kernel.org > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > --- > ✓ [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 > + Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lore.kernel.org_r_20240806061749.143072-2D1-2Deiichi.tsukata-40nutanix.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=dy01Dr4Ly8mhvnUdx1pZhhT1bkq4h9z5aVWu3paoZtk&m=_0OObZsmx6FjjueHZafPjJj8gKzbBsFc_De-z9V-NlDqBdP2JXkVHey4ZnvbC5et&s=Rw2ve-4V8ySCyy7B99P6fc1biLAeFkcjpcB2SjTAAc8&e= > + Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > --- > ✓ Signed: DKIM/nutanix.com > --- > Total patches: 1 > --- > Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lore.kernel.org_r_20240806061749.143072-2D1-2Deiichi.tsukata-40nutanix.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=dy01Dr4Ly8mhvnUdx1pZhhT1bkq4h9z5aVWu3paoZtk&m=_0OObZsmx6FjjueHZafPjJj8gKzbBsFc_De-z9V-NlDqBdP2JXkVHey4ZnvbC5et&s=Rw2ve-4V8ySCyy7B99P6fc1biLAeFkcjpcB2SjTAAc8&e= > Base: not specified > git am ./20240806_eiichi_tsukata_perf_test_use_wp_u_fortify_source_for_tests_built_with_o0.mbx > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git am ./20240806_eiichi_tsukata_perf_test_use_wp_u_fortify_source_for_tests_built_with_o0.mbx > Applying: perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 > error: patch failed: tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build:7 > error: tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build: patch does not apply > Patch failed at 0001 perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 > hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch > hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". > hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. > hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". > hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false" > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git am --abort > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ > >>> On Aug 6, 2024, at 15:27, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> FYI: Fedora uses “RPM_OPT_FLAGS” as “EXTRA_CFLAGS” to build perf. >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__src.fedoraproject.org_rpms_kernel_blob_rawhide_f_kernel.spec-23-5F2908&d=DwIDaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=dy01Dr4Ly8mhvnUdx1pZhhT1bkq4h9z5aVWu3paoZtk&m=_0OObZsmx6FjjueHZafPjJj8gKzbBsFc_De-z9V-NlDqBdP2JXkVHey4ZnvbC5et&s=9EKEgobk4lamLGzFX9G0hfSjJmqvmU1cOeoJUGVXn_g&e= >>> >>> And on Fedora40, it has “-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3”. >>> >>> [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --showrc | grep RPM_OPT | head -n 1 >>> RPM_OPT_FLAGS="%{optflags}" >>> [eiichi@t495 ~]$ rpm --eval '%{optflags}' >>> -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mon-omit-leaf-frame-pointer >>> >>> Best, >>> Eiichi >>> >>>> On Aug 6, 2024, at 15:17, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> If EXTRA_CFLAGS has "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2", the build fails with: >>>> >>>> error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Werror=cpp] >>>> >>>> Use "-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" instead of "-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" for tests >>>> built with -O0. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> >>>> --- >>>> tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build | 8 ++++---- >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build >>>> index 48bf0d3b0f3d..ec36c21e375e 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build >>>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ perf-test-y += sqrtloop.o >>>> perf-test-y += brstack.o >>>> perf-test-y += datasym.o >>>> >>>> -CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> -CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> -CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> -CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> +CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> +CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> +CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> +CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE >>>> -- >>>> 2.45.2 >>>> >>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-27 2:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-08-06 6:17 [PATCH] perf test: Use -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE for tests built with -O0 Eiichi Tsukata 2024-08-06 6:27 ` Eiichi Tsukata 2024-08-26 3:04 ` Eiichi Tsukata 2024-08-26 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2024-08-27 2:45 ` Eiichi Tsukata
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox