From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>
Cc: "'Shuai Xue'" <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
"'Jing Zhang'" <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
"'Will Deacon'" <will@kernel.org>,
"'Mark Rutland'" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"'Jingoo Han'" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"'Lorenzo Pieralisi'" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"'Krzysztof Wilczyński'" <kw@linux.com>,
"'Rob Herring'" <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf/dwc_pcie: Move common DWC struct definitions to 'pcie-dwc.h'
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:57:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220072747.azfluj6mrkqy5osq@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02d901db835c$f0710450$d1530cf0$@samsung.com>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:31:49AM +0530, Shradha Todi wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay <devnull+manivannan.sadhasivam.linaro.org@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 18 February 2025 20:07
> > To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>; Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>; Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>; Mark Rutland
> > <mark.rutland@arm.com>; Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>; Lorenzo Pieralisi
> > <lpieralisi@kernel.org>; Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>; Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-perf-
> > users@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] perf/dwc_pcie: Move common DWC struct definitions to 'pcie-dwc.h'
> >
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> >
> > Since these are common to all Desginware PCIe IPs, move them to a new header, 'pcie-dwc.h' so that other drivers could make use of
> > them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 23 ++---------------------
> > include/linux/pcie-dwc.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 896a307fa065..b4d09d52a750 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -18123,6 +18123,7 @@ S: Maintained
> > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml
> > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml
> > F: drivers/pci/controller/dwc/*designware*
> > +F: include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
> >
> > PCI DRIVER FOR TI DRA7XX/J721E
> > M: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c index cccecae9823f..05b37ea7cf16 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/pcie-dwc.h>
> > #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > @@ -99,26 +100,6 @@ struct dwc_pcie_dev_info {
> > struct list_head dev_node;
> > };
> >
> > -struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id {
> > - u16 vendor_id;
> > - u16 vsec_id;
> > - u8 vsec_rev;
> > -};
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * VSEC IDs are allocated by the vendor, so a given ID may mean different
> > - * things to different vendors. See PCIe r6.0, sec 7.9.5.2.
> > - */
> > -static const struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_ids[] = {
> > - { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ALIBABA,
> > - .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> > - { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMPERE,
> > - .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> > - { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM,
> > - .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> > - {} /* terminator */
> > -};
> > -
> > static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
> > struct device_attribute *attr,
> > char *buf)
> > @@ -529,7 +510,7 @@ static void dwc_pcie_unregister_pmu(void *data)
> >
> > static u16 dwc_pcie_des_cap(struct pci_dev *pdev) {
> > - const struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id *vid;
> > + const struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id *vid;
> > u16 vsec;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h b/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..261ae11d75a4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Alibaba Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2025 Linaro Ltd.
> > + * Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef LINUX_PCIE_DWC_H
> > +#define LINUX_PCIE_DWC_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/pci_ids.h>
> > +
> > +struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id {
> > + u16 vendor_id;
> > + u16 vsec_id;
> > + u8 vsec_rev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * VSEC IDs are allocated by the vendor, so a given ID may mean
> > +different
> > + * things to different vendors. See PCIe r6.0, sec 7.9.5.2.
> > + */
> > +static const struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_ids[] = {
>
> Rename this to dwc_pcie_rasdes_vsec_ids? pmu was perf file specific but technically the vsec is rasdes.
>
Sure.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 14:36 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Add PTM sysfs support Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-02-18 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf/dwc_pcie: Move common DWC struct definitions to 'pcie-dwc.h' Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-02-18 16:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-02-19 7:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-20 6:01 ` Shradha Todi
2025-02-20 7:27 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2025-02-18 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: dwc: Add helper to find the Vendor Specific Extended Capability (VSEC) Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-02-18 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: dwc: Add sysfs support for PTM Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-02-18 17:54 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-02-19 8:14 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-18 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: qcom-ep: Mask PTM_UPDATING interrupt Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-02-18 16:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Add PTM sysfs support Frank Li
2025-02-19 7:49 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250220072747.azfluj6mrkqy5osq@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shradha.t@samsung.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox