From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: namhyung@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix BUG_ON in basic block processing
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:38:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410183852.872311-1-ak@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Hit with perf annotate --code-with-type --stdio
perf: util/annotate-data.c:1299: find_data_type_insn: Assertion
`!(bb->begin->al.offset == -1 || bb->end->al.offset == -1)' failed.
This makes sure to skip non instruction disasm lines in all cases that
add basic blocks. Also added some extra BUG_ONs for this case.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c | 10 +++++++++-
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
index c3ffb8cad4fc..51ca86ef2677 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
@@ -986,7 +986,15 @@ static void prepend_basic_blocks(struct list_head *this_blocks,
}
/* Point to the insn before the last when adding this block to full_blocks */
- last_bb->end = list_prev_entry(last_bb->end, al.node);
+ do {
+ /* Nothing useful found */
+ if (last_bb->end == last_bb->begin) {
+ list_del(&last_bb->list);
+ free(last_bb);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ last_bb->end = list_prev_entry(last_bb->end, al.node);
+ } while (last_bb->end->al.offset == -1);
out:
list_splice(this_blocks, full_blocks);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 18ce9f37053e..1c226f257245 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -2966,6 +2966,7 @@ static int add_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
if (dl == NULL)
return -1;
+ BUG_ON(dl->al.offset == -1);
if (!is_new_basic_block(bb_data, dl))
return 0;
@@ -3006,7 +3007,7 @@ static bool process_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
last_dl = list_last_entry(¬es->src->source,
struct disasm_line, al.node);
- if (last_dl->al.offset == -1)
+ while (last_dl && last_dl->al.offset == -1)
last_dl = annotation__prev_asm_line(notes, last_dl);
if (last_dl == NULL)
@@ -3052,6 +3053,7 @@ static bool process_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
break;
}
+ BUG_ON(dl->al.offset == -1);
link->bb->end = dl;
return found;
}
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 18:38 Andi Kleen [this message]
2025-04-11 21:45 ` [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix BUG_ON in basic block processing Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250410183852.872311-1-ak@linux.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox