public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix BUG_ON in basic block processing
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:45:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_mNiOA_Rm9Jl6kX@z2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410183852.872311-1-ak@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:38:52AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hit with perf annotate --code-with-type --stdio
> 
> perf: util/annotate-data.c:1299: find_data_type_insn: Assertion
> `!(bb->begin->al.offset == -1 || bb->end->al.offset == -1)' failed.
> 
> This makes sure to skip non instruction disasm lines in all cases that
> add basic blocks. Also added some extra BUG_ONs for this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Namhyung

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c      |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> index c3ffb8cad4fc..51ca86ef2677 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> @@ -986,7 +986,15 @@ static void prepend_basic_blocks(struct list_head *this_blocks,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Point to the insn before the last when adding this block to full_blocks */
> -	last_bb->end = list_prev_entry(last_bb->end, al.node);
> +	do {
> +		/* Nothing useful found */
> +		if (last_bb->end == last_bb->begin) {
> +			list_del(&last_bb->list);
> +			free(last_bb);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		last_bb->end = list_prev_entry(last_bb->end, al.node);
> +	} while (last_bb->end->al.offset == -1);
>  
>  out:
>  	list_splice(this_blocks, full_blocks);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index 18ce9f37053e..1c226f257245 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -2966,6 +2966,7 @@ static int add_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
>  
>  	if (dl == NULL)
>  		return -1;
> +	BUG_ON(dl->al.offset == -1);
>  
>  	if (!is_new_basic_block(bb_data, dl))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -3006,7 +3007,7 @@ static bool process_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
>  
>  	last_dl = list_last_entry(&notes->src->source,
>  				  struct disasm_line, al.node);
> -	if (last_dl->al.offset == -1)
> +	while (last_dl && last_dl->al.offset == -1)
>  		last_dl = annotation__prev_asm_line(notes, last_dl);
>  
>  	if (last_dl == NULL)
> @@ -3052,6 +3053,7 @@ static bool process_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
>  		break;
>  
>  	}
> +	BUG_ON(dl->al.offset == -1);
>  	link->bb->end = dl;
>  	return found;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 18:38 [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix BUG_ON in basic block processing Andi Kleen
2025-04-11 21:45 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_mNiOA_Rm9Jl6kX@z2 \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox