public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "James Clark" <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] perf arm_spe: Make a function to get the MIDR
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:14:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414111433.19889C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414-james-spe-impdef-decode-v3-1-63baf9c893b1@linaro.org>

Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] Missing NULL pointer check on the result of `perf_env__cpuid()` leads to a potential segmentation fault in `strtol()`.
--

commit 6dbdbd9b51f99a0d48fd13fa50acc79faa59bbb8
Author: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>

perf arm_spe: Make a function to get the MIDR

This commit extracts a function to get the MIDR, which will be needed to
dump IMPDEF events in later commits. No functional changes are intended.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -987,15 +982,28 @@ static void arm_spe__synth_ds(struct arm_spe_queue *speq,
>  
>  		pr_warning_once("Old SPE metadata, re-record to improve decode accuracy\n");
>  		cpuid = perf_env__cpuid(perf_session__env(spe->session));
> -		midr = strtol(cpuid, NULL, 16);
> -	} else {
> -		metadata = arm_spe__get_metadata_by_cpu(spe, speq->cpu);
> -		if (!metadata)
> -			return;
> -
> -		midr = metadata[ARM_SPE_CPU_MIDR];
> +		*midr = strtol(cpuid, NULL, 16);

Could this cause a segmentation fault if perf_env__cpuid() returns NULL?

If reading the CPU ID fails (for instance, when processing an SPE trace with
old metadata on a machine lacking the expected sysfs CPU ID files), passing
NULL to strtol() will crash the tool.

I note this behavior was present before this patch, and I see it is addressed
later in the patch series in commit be72d9e89c04e ("perf arm_spe: Handle
missing CPU IDs").

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260414-james-spe-impdef-decode-v3-0-63baf9c893b1@linaro.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-14 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-14 11:04 [PATCH v3 0/6] perf arm_spe: Dump IMPDEF events James Clark
2026-04-14 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] perf arm_spe: Make a function to get the MIDR James Clark
2026-04-14 11:14   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-14 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] perf arm_spe: Handle missing CPU IDs James Clark
2026-04-14 11:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-14 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] perf arm_spe: Store MIDR in arm_spe_pkt James Clark
2026-04-14 13:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-14 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] perf arm_spe: Turn event name mappings into an array James Clark
2026-04-14 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] perf arm_spe: Decode Arm N1 IMPDEF events James Clark
2026-04-14 17:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-14 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] perf arm_spe: Print remaining IMPDEF event numbers James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260414111433.19889C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox