From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ICX
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 14:11:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515061143.338553-2-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515061143.338553-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Update perf hard-coded event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for
Icelake server according to the latest ICX perfmon events (v1.30).
Since the value of cache extra registers differs with previous
generations, introduce new snc_hw_cache_extra_regs[] to represent the
value of extra registers on ICX.
ICX perfmon events:
https://github.com/intel/perfmon/blob/main/ICX/events/icelakex_core.json
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 793335c3ce78..1390d1da985b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -310,10 +310,11 @@ static struct extra_reg intel_skl_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
static struct event_constraint intel_icl_event_constraints[] = {
FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01c0, 0), /* old INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
- FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
+ FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0), /* pseudo INST_RETIRED.ANY */
FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
- FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
- FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3), /* SLOTS */
+ FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0200, 1), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD */
+ FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF_TSC */
+ FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3), /* pseudo TOPDOWN.SLOTS */
METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING, 0),
METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_BAD_SPEC, 1),
METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_FE_BOUND, 2),
@@ -1019,6 +1020,41 @@ static __initconst const u64 skl_hw_cache_extra_regs
},
};
+static __initconst const u64 snc_hw_cache_extra_regs
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
+{
+ [ C(LL ) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x10001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.ANY_RESPONSE */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3FBFC00001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.L3_MISS */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x3F3FFC0002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.ANY_RESPONSE */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3F3FC00002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.L3_MISS */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0,
+ },
+ },
+ [ C(NODE) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x104000001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.LOCAL_DRAM */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x730000001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.REMOTE_DRAM */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x104000002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.LOCAL_DRAM */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x730000002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.REMOTE_DRAM */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0,
+ },
+ },
+};
+
#define SNB_DMND_DATA_RD (1ULL << 0)
#define SNB_DMND_RFO (1ULL << 1)
#define SNB_DMND_IFETCH (1ULL << 2)
@@ -8119,17 +8155,19 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
case INTEL_ICELAKE_X:
case INTEL_ICELAKE_D:
+ memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snc_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
x86_pmu.pebs_ept = 1;
pmem = true;
- fallthrough;
+ goto snc_common;
case INTEL_ICELAKE_L:
case INTEL_ICELAKE:
case INTEL_TIGERLAKE_L:
case INTEL_TIGERLAKE:
case INTEL_ROCKETLAKE:
+ memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, skl_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
+ snc_common:
x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, skl_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
- memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, skl_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
hw_cache_event_ids[C(ITLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1;
intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl();
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 6:11 [PATCH 00/11] perf/x86/intel: Fix inaccurate hard-coded event configurations Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SPR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for DMR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ADL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for MTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for LNL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ARL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for PTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for NVL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SRF Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for CWF Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515061143.338553-2-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox