Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ICX
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 14:11:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515061143.338553-2-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515061143.338553-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Update perf hard-coded event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for
Icelake server according to the latest ICX perfmon events (v1.30).

Since the value of cache extra registers differs with previous
generations, introduce new snc_hw_cache_extra_regs[] to represent the
value of extra registers on ICX.

ICX perfmon events:
https://github.com/intel/perfmon/blob/main/ICX/events/icelakex_core.json

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 793335c3ce78..1390d1da985b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -310,10 +310,11 @@ static struct extra_reg intel_skl_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
 static struct event_constraint intel_icl_event_constraints[] = {
 	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0),	/* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
 	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01c0, 0),	/* old INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
-	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0),	/* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0),	/* pseudo INST_RETIRED.ANY */
 	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1),	/* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
-	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2),	/* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
-	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3),	/* SLOTS */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0200, 1),	/* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2),	/* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF_TSC */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3),	/* pseudo TOPDOWN.SLOTS */
 	METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING, 0),
 	METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_BAD_SPEC, 1),
 	METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_FE_BOUND, 2),
@@ -1019,6 +1020,41 @@ static __initconst const u64 skl_hw_cache_extra_regs
  },
 };
 
+static __initconst const u64 snc_hw_cache_extra_regs
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
+{
+ [ C(LL  ) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x10001,		/* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.ANY_RESPONSE */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x3FBFC00001,	/* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.L3_MISS */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x3F3FFC0002,	/* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.ANY_RESPONSE */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x3F3FC00002,	/* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.L3_MISS */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+ },
+ [ C(NODE) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x104000001,	/* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.LOCAL_DRAM */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x730000001,	/* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.REMOTE_DRAM */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x104000002,	/* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.LOCAL_DRAM */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x730000002,	/* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.REMOTE_DRAM */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+ },
+};
+
 #define SNB_DMND_DATA_RD	(1ULL << 0)
 #define SNB_DMND_RFO		(1ULL << 1)
 #define SNB_DMND_IFETCH		(1ULL << 2)
@@ -8119,17 +8155,19 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 	case INTEL_ICELAKE_X:
 	case INTEL_ICELAKE_D:
+		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snc_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
 		x86_pmu.pebs_ept = 1;
 		pmem = true;
-		fallthrough;
+		goto snc_common;
 	case INTEL_ICELAKE_L:
 	case INTEL_ICELAKE:
 	case INTEL_TIGERLAKE_L:
 	case INTEL_TIGERLAKE:
 	case INTEL_ROCKETLAKE:
+		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, skl_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
+	snc_common:
 		x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
 		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, skl_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
-		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, skl_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
 		hw_cache_event_ids[C(ITLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1;
 		intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl();
 
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15  6:11 [PATCH 00/11] perf/x86/intel: Fix inaccurate hard-coded event configurations Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SPR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for DMR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ADL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for MTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for LNL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ARL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for PTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for NVL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SRF Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15  6:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for CWF Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260515061143.338553-2-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox