From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/14] perf stat: Extend JSON output linter to test core aggregation checks
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 22:53:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522225341.652B61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522223342.2393553-12-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Reusing the same test functions for the `--new` API pass results in indistinguishable log messages, making debugging difficult.
--
commit 757070262571c3df3509bd31055f9fb6103f0ded
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf stat: Extend JSON output linter to test core aggregation checks
This commit extends the stat+json_output.sh script to test core aggregation
checks using the new JSON print API. It introduces a perf_new_opt variable
and runs the existing checking functions a second time with the --new flag
to validate the zero-allocation print callbacks.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat+json_output.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat+json_output.sh
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat+json_output.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat+json_output.sh
[ ... ]
> @@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ function ParanoidAndNotRoot()
> check_no_args()
> {
> echo -n "Checking json output: no args "
> - perf stat -j -o "${stat_output}" true
> + perf stat -j $perf_new_opt -o "${stat_output}" true
> $PYTHON $pythonchecker --no-args --file "${stat_output}"
> echo "[Success]"
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -232,5 +233,21 @@ then
> else
> echo "[Skip] Skipping tests for system_wide_no_aggr, per_core, per_die and per_socket since socket id exposed via topology is invalid"
> fi
> +# Run New API JSON basic and standard aggregation checks
> +perf_new_opt="--new"
> +check_no_args
[Severity: Low]
Does reusing the same test functions for the --new API pass result in
indistinguishable log messages?
The status output (e.g., echo -n "Checking json output: no args ") is
hardcoded in the functions and does not print the perf_new_opt value.
This means the test log will contain duplicate identical lines for the
two passes.
Could this make it difficult to determine which API mode failed during
automated testing?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260522223342.2393553-1-irogers@google.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 22:33 [RFC PATCH v1 00/14] perf stat: Decouple and modularize metrics/events output printing API Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/14] perf stat: Introduce core generic print traversal engine and header stubs Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 23:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/14] perf stat: Implement standard console (STD) formatting callbacks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test basic New API checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test core aggregation checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test advanced PMU checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test metric-only checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/14] perf stat: Implement CSV formatting callbacks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 23:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/14] perf stat: Extend CSV output linter to test core aggregation checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/14] perf stat: Extend CSV output linter to test advanced PMU and metric-only checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/14] perf stat: Implement streaming JSON formatting callbacks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 23:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/14] perf stat: Extend JSON output linter to test core aggregation checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/14] perf stat: Extend JSON output linter to test advanced PMU and metric-only checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/14] perf stat: Add --new support to PMU metrics Python validator Ian Rogers
2026-05-22 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/14] perf stat: Extend PMU metrics value linter to validate --new outputs Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/14] perf stat: Decouple and modularize metrics/events output printing API Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/14] perf stat: Introduce core generic print traversal engine and header stubs Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-25 23:48 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-26 0:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/14] perf stat: Implement standard console (STD) formatting callbacks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-26 0:09 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test basic New API checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test core aggregation checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test advanced PMU checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/14] perf stat: Extend STD output linter to test metric-only checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/14] perf stat: Implement CSV formatting callbacks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/14] perf stat: Extend CSV output linter to test core aggregation checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/14] perf stat: Extend CSV output linter to test advanced PMU and metric-only checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/14] perf stat: Implement streaming JSON formatting callbacks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/14] perf stat: Extend JSON output linter to test core aggregation checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/14] perf stat: Extend JSON output linter to test advanced PMU and metric-only checks Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/14] perf stat: Add --new support to PMU metrics Python validator Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/14] perf stat: Extend PMU metrics value linter to validate --new outputs Ian Rogers
2026-05-25 23:53 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522225341.652B61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox