Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v8 23/23] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 15:56:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260529075645.580362-24-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529075645.580362-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Prevent potential infinite loops by adding a sanity check for the
corrupted PEBS fragment sizes which could happen in theory.

If a corrupted PEBS fragment is detected, the entire PEBS record
including the corrupted fragment and all subsequent records will be
dropped and a NULL PEBS record is reported to user space. This ensures
the integrity of PEBS data and prevents infinite loops in
setup_arch_pebs_sample_data() again.

Please note software has no way to figure out which events are impacted
from the corrupted record, so the last record of each event would be
discarded for all events if corrupted record is detected even though
it may be a well-formed record for some events.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index e0d307627702..3e100cb206a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -2675,6 +2675,9 @@ static void setup_arch_pebs_sample_data(struct perf_event *event,
 
 again:
 	header = at;
+	if (!header->size)
+		return;
+
 	next_record = at + sizeof(struct arch_pebs_header);
 	if (header->basic) {
 		struct arch_pebs_basic *basic = next_record;
@@ -2827,7 +2830,7 @@ static void setup_arch_pebs_sample_data(struct perf_event *event,
 	}
 
 	/* Parse followed fragments if there are. */
-	if (arch_pebs_record_continued(header)) {
+	if (arch_pebs_record_continued(header) && header->size) {
 		at = at + header->size;
 		goto again;
 	}
@@ -2956,13 +2959,21 @@ __intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(struct perf_event *event,
 			    struct pt_regs *iregs,
 			    struct pt_regs *regs,
 			    struct perf_sample_data *data,
-			    void *at,
-			    int count,
+			    void *at, int count, bool corrupted,
 			    setup_fn setup_sample)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 
-	setup_sample(event, iregs, at, data, regs);
+	/* Skip parsing corrupted PEBS record. */
+	if (corrupted) {
+		/* Clear stale register states in previous records. */
+		memset(regs, 0, sizeof(*regs));
+		x86_pmu_clear_perf_regs(regs);
+		perf_sample_data_init(data, 0, event->hw.last_period);
+	} else {
+		setup_sample(event, iregs, at, data, regs);
+	}
+
 	if (iregs == &dummy_iregs) {
 		/*
 		 * The PEBS records may be drained in the non-overflow context,
@@ -2980,12 +2991,16 @@ __intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(struct perf_event *event,
 	}
 
 	if (hwc->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) {
-		if ((is_pebs_counter_event_group(event))) {
-			/*
-			 * The value of each sample has been updated when setup
-			 * the corresponding sample data.
-			 */
-			perf_event_update_userpage(event);
+		if (is_pebs_counter_event_group(event)) {
+			if (corrupted) {
+				intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload(event, 1);
+			} else {
+				/*
+				 * The value of each sample has been updated
+				 * when setup the corresponding sample data.
+				 */
+				perf_event_update_userpage(event);
+			}
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * Now, auto-reload is only enabled in fixed period mode.
@@ -3009,7 +3024,7 @@ __intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(struct perf_event *event,
 		 * counters-snapshotting record, only needs to set the new
 		 * period for the counter.
 		 */
-		if (is_pebs_counter_event_group(event))
+		if (is_pebs_counter_event_group(event) && !corrupted)
 			static_call(x86_pmu_set_period)(event);
 		else
 			intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event);
@@ -3038,13 +3053,15 @@ __intel_pmu_pebs_events(struct perf_event *event,
 		iregs = &dummy_iregs;
 
 	while (cnt > 1) {
-		__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, regs, data, at, setup_sample);
+		__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, regs, data,
+				       at, setup_sample);
 		at += cpuc->pebs_record_size;
 		at = get_next_pebs_record_by_bit(at, top, bit);
 		cnt--;
 	}
 
-	__intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(event, iregs, regs, data, at, count, setup_sample);
+	__intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(event, iregs, regs, data, at,
+				    count, false, setup_sample);
 }
 
 static int intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_data *data)
@@ -3259,7 +3276,8 @@ static __always_inline void
 __intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 				    struct pt_regs *regs,
 				    struct perf_sample_data *data,
-				    u64 mask, short *counts, void **last,
+				    u64 mask, short *counts,
+				    void **last, bool corrupted,
 				    setup_fn setup_sample)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
@@ -3273,7 +3291,7 @@ __intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 		event = cpuc->events[bit];
 
 		__intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(event, iregs, regs, data, last[bit],
-					    counts[bit], setup_sample);
+					    counts[bit], corrupted, setup_sample);
 	}
 
 }
@@ -3327,7 +3345,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_da
 	}
 
 	__intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(iregs, regs, data, mask, counts, last,
-					    setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data);
+					    false, setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data);
 
 	return hweight64(events_bitmap);
 }
@@ -3343,6 +3361,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 	struct pt_regs *regs = &perf_regs->regs;
 	void *base, *at, *top;
 	u64 events_bitmap = 0;
+	bool corrupted = false;
 	u64 mask;
 
 	rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PEBS_INDEX, index.whole);
@@ -3377,8 +3396,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 
 		header = at;
 
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!header->size))
-			break;
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!header->size)) {
+			corrupted = true;
+			goto done;
+		}
 
 		/* 1st fragment or single record must have basic group */
 		if (!header->basic) {
@@ -3398,15 +3419,24 @@ static int intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs(struct pt_regs *iregs,
 			if (!header->size)
 				break;
 			at += header->size;
+			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(at >= top)) {
+				corrupted = true;
+				goto done;
+			}
 			header = at;
 		}
 
 		/* Skip last fragment or the single record */
 		at += header->size;
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(at > top)) {
+			corrupted = true;
+			goto done;
+		}
 	}
 
+done:
 	__intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(iregs, regs, data, mask,
-					    counts, last,
+					    counts, last, corrupted,
 					    setup_arch_pebs_sample_data);
 
 	return hweight64(events_bitmap);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-29  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-29  7:56 [Patch v8 00/23] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 01/23] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  8:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 11:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 02/23] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  8:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 03/23] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 04/23] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 05/23] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific functions definations Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 06/23] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handlers Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 07/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  8:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 11:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 08/23] x86/fpu: Ensure TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set after saving FPU state Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 09/23] perf: Move and enhance has_extended_regs() for arch-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 10/23] perf/x86: Enable XMM Register Sampling for Non-PEBS Events Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  9:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 11:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 11/23] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  9:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 11:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 12/23] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  8:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 13/23] perf/x86: Support XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  8:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 14/23] perf/x86: Support YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  8:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 15/23] perf/x86: Support ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 16/23] perf/x86: Support OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  9:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 17/23] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 18/23] perf/x86: Support eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 19/23] perf/x86: Support SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29 10:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 20/23] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  9:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 21/23] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29 10:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` [Patch v8 22/23] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-05-29  9:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  7:56 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-05-29  9:54   ` [Patch v8 23/23] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size sashiko-bot
2026-05-29  8:32 ` [Patch v8 00/23] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260529075645.580362-24-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox