From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Guard remaining test_bit calls from OOB sample CPU
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 12:31:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605123129.8135D1F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605121515.1725549-2-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Logic error in CPU filtering bounds checks allows out-of-bounds CPU IDs to bypass the filter.
--
commit c7a6257406af3fb4587a3e6f3454c67efbc1b249
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf tools: Guard remaining test_bit calls from OOB sample CPU
This commit adds bounds checking to filter_cpu in auxtrace.c and
builtin-script.c to prevent out-of-bounds reads in test_bit when
the CPU value is corrupt or absent.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> index f4aa255fc3297..9ac29bdc3cd54 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> @@ -2646,7 +2646,7 @@ static int cleanup_scripting(void)
>
> static bool filter_cpu(struct perf_sample *sample)
> {
> - if (cpu_list && sample->cpu != (u32)-1)
> + if (cpu_list && sample->cpu != (u32)-1 && sample->cpu < MAX_NR_CPUS)
> return !test_bit(sample->cpu, cpu_bitmap);
> return false;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
When sample->cpu is greater than or equal to MAX_NR_CPUS, the condition fails
and the function returns false. Does returning false here mean the out-of-bounds
sample is kept rather than dropped?
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> index 5f4aa1701aef6..4cd2caf540152 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> @@ -372,7 +372,8 @@ static bool filter_cpu(struct perf_session *session, struct perf_cpu cpu)
> {
> unsigned long *cpu_bitmap = session->itrace_synth_opts->cpu_bitmap;
>
> - return cpu_bitmap && cpu.cpu != -1 && !test_bit(cpu.cpu, cpu_bitmap);
> + return cpu_bitmap && cpu.cpu >= 0 && cpu.cpu < MAX_NR_CPUS &&
> + !test_bit(cpu.cpu, cpu_bitmap);
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Similarly in auxtrace.c, if cpu.cpu is greater than or equal to MAX_NR_CPUS,
this boolean expression evaluates to false.
In auxtrace_queues__add_buffer, if filter_cpu returns false, the buffer is kept
and queued:
if (filter_cpu(session, buffer->cpu))
return 0;
buffer = memdup(buffer, sizeof(*buffer));
Could this cause corrupted events to bypass the filter and be processed
downstream?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605121515.1725549-1-acme@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 12:15 [PATCHES v1 0/5] perf tools: Fix OOB reads, reference leaks, and overflow in sched/script/auxtrace Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Guard remaining test_bit calls from OOB sample CPU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf tools: Add bounds check to cpu__get_node() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 14:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf sched: Fix thread reference leaks in timehist_get_thread() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf sched: Cap max_cpu at MAX_CPUS in timehist sample processing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 14:34 ` David Ahern
2026-06-05 15:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf sched: Fix register_pid() overflow, strcpy, and BUG_ON Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:29 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605123129.8135D1F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox