Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf sched: Cap max_cpu at MAX_CPUS in timehist sample processing
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 12:43:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605124353.1B9591F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605121515.1725549-5-acme@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] perf_sched__timehist omits the .feature tool callback, breaking perf_env population in pipe mode.
- [High] Leaked callchain nodes and violation of reference counting rules during idle threads teardown.
--

commit fa7c274dda31324797cc9c2df04b0e7a2f0a40d2
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf sched: Cap max_cpu at MAX_CPUS in timehist sample processing

This commit adds bounds checking to sched->max_cpu updates from the
sample CPU. It caps env->nr_cpus_online initialization of max_cpu to
MAX_CPUS to prevent out-of-bounds array accesses on large systems or
recordings with high CPU IDs.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> index 7bd61028327b3..87a1f4cf8760e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -3385,8 +3387,8 @@ static int perf_sched__timehist(struct perf_sched *sched)
>  		perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, migrate_handlers))
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	/* pre-allocate struct for per-CPU idle stats */
> -	sched->max_cpu.cpu = env->nr_cpus_online;
> +	/* pre-allocate struct for per-CPU idle stats; cap to array bounds */
> +	sched->max_cpu.cpu = min(env->nr_cpus_online, MAX_CPUS);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does perf_sched__timehist() correctly
populate perf_env in pipe mode?

Looking at perf_sched__timehist() in tools/perf/builtin-sched.c, the tool
callbacks are initialized without a .feature callback:

    sched->tool.sample       = perf_timehist__process_sample;
    sched->tool.mmap         = perf_event__process_mmap;
    ...
    sched->tool.build_id     = perf_event__process_build_id;

Without registering perf_event__process_feature, piped perf.data streams
might silently drop non-seekable PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE events.

Does this leave perf_env uninitialized and break environment metadata lookups
like the env->nr_cpus_online field accessed here?

[Severity: High]
This is another pre-existing issue, but is there a reference counting leak
during teardown in free_idle_threads()?

When cleaning up the idle threads array created below by init_idle_threads(),
the cleanup code uses the internal destructor instead of the lifecycle helper:

    free_idle_threads() {
        ...
        thread__delete(idle);
    }

Since reference handles allocated via thread__new() must be strictly paired
with thread__put(), does calling thread__delete() directly bypass the
reference wrapper lifecycle and leak the pointer handle, triggering
REFCNT_CHECKING traps? 

Also, does destroying the thread without proper cleanup leak the dynamically
allocated nodes inside itr->callchain?

>  	if (sched->max_cpu.cpu == 0)
>  		sched->max_cpu.cpu = 4;
>  	if (init_idle_threads(sched->max_cpu.cpu))

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605121515.1725549-1-acme@kernel.org?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05 12:15 [PATCHES v1 0/5] perf tools: Fix OOB reads, reference leaks, and overflow in sched/script/auxtrace Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Guard remaining test_bit calls from OOB sample CPU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf tools: Add bounds check to cpu__get_node() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 14:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 14:45     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf sched: Fix thread reference leaks in timehist_get_thread() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf sched: Cap max_cpu at MAX_CPUS in timehist sample processing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:43   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 14:34   ` David Ahern
2026-06-05 15:01     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf sched: Fix register_pid() overflow, strcpy, and BUG_ON Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 12:29   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260605124353.1B9591F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox