From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PCI PMU cleanup on setup failure
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:00:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611160033.66760-2-zide.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611160033.66760-1-zide.chen@intel.com>
When uncore_pci_pmu_register() fails, pmu->boxes[die] is set to NULL
before returning. In the uncore_pci_remove() path, this causes
uncore_pci_pmu_unregister() to be skipped entirely, leaking
pmu->activeboxes. In the uncore_bus_notify() path,
uncore_pci_pmu_unregister() may still be called and must exit early
when pmu->boxes[die] is NULL to avoid a NULL pointer dereference, and
to ensure activeboxes is only decremented for a previously active box.
Additionally, since pci_get_drvdata() returns NULL on registration
failure, uncore_pci_remove() can no longer treat NULL drvdata as an
indicator of an auxiliary PCI device. Remove the associated
WARN_ON_ONCE().
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512233048.9577-1-zide.chen@intel.com?part=1
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---
v3: Add Reviewed-by tag.
v2: New patch.
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 7857959c6e82..b69b6a21d46b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1183,6 +1183,7 @@ static int uncore_pci_pmu_register(struct pci_dev *pdev,
/* First active box registers the pmu */
ret = uncore_pmu_register(pmu);
if (ret) {
+ atomic_dec(&pmu->activeboxes);
pmu->boxes[die] = NULL;
uncore_box_exit(box);
kfree(box);
@@ -1248,6 +1249,9 @@ static void uncore_pci_pmu_unregister(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu, int die)
{
struct intel_uncore_box *box = pmu->boxes[die];
+ if (!box)
+ return;
+
pmu->boxes[die] = NULL;
if (atomic_dec_return(&pmu->activeboxes) == 0)
uncore_pmu_unregister(pmu);
@@ -1272,7 +1276,6 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
break;
}
}
- WARN_ON_ONCE(i >= UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX);
return;
}
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 16:00 [PATCH v3 0/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: PMU setup robustness fixes Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:00 ` Zide Chen [this message]
2026-06-11 16:26 ` [PATCH V3 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PCI PMU cleanup on setup failure sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 16:00 ` [PATCH V3 2/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix refcnt and other cleanups Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 16:00 ` [PATCH V3 3/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Let init_box() callback report failures Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 16:00 ` [PATCH V3 4/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Keep PCI PMUs working when MMIO/MSR setup fails Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:00 ` [PATCH V3 5/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Factor out box setup code Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:00 ` [PATCH V3 6/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Introduce PMU flags and broken state Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 16:00 ` [PATCH V3 7/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_box ref/unref ordering Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 16:00 ` [PATCH V3 8/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement lazy setup for MSR/MMIO PMUs Zide Chen
2026-06-11 16:33 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611160033.66760-2-zide.chen@intel.com \
--to=zide.chen@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox