From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 03:57:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709035721.9EE901F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709033701.1117943-3-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Capstone disassembly silently falls back to the host architecture when `ms->thread` is `NULL`, breaking cross-platform annotation.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing error handling for `map_symbol__get_arch()` causes a NULL pointer dereference crash when processing unsupported architectures.
- [High] Unconditional dereference of `result->name` when `result` is NULL in `arch__find()` error logging.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread ---
commit 58ae613c4021f8e6e076d81d76c91fd8fc818a3e
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread
The patch makes perf annotate more robust when annotating without a thread
context by falling back to reading the e_machine from a map's dso. It also
ensures other uses of map_symbol thread don't assume it is non-NULL.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index 02505222d8c2d..e89029f0d0958 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -982,21 +982,46 @@ void symbol__calc_percent(struct symbol *sym, struct evsel *evsel)
[ ... ]
> -int thread__get_arch(struct thread *thread, const struct arch **parch)
> +int map_symbol__get_arch(struct map_symbol *ms, const struct arch **parch)
> {
> + struct machine *machine = NULL;
> + const char *cpuid = NULL;
> const struct arch *arch;
> - struct machine *machine;
> - uint32_t e_flags;
> - uint16_t e_machine;
[ ... ]
> - machine = maps__machine(thread__maps(thread));
> - e_machine = thread__e_machine(thread, machine, &e_flags);
> - arch = arch__find(e_machine, e_flags, machine->env ? machine->env->cpuid : NULL);
> + arch = arch__find(e_machine, e_flags, cpuid);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this error path in arch__find() crash?
If arch_new_fn[e_machine]() fails (e.g., rejecting a malformed CPUID string)
and returns NULL, it sets result to NULL. The error handling path checks if
result is NULL, but then immediately dereferences result->name in the print
statement:
tools/perf/util/disasm.c:arch__find() {
...
result = arch_new_fn[e_machine](&key, cpuid);
if (!result) {
pr_err("%s: failed to initialize %s (%u) arch priv area\n",
__func__, result->name, e_machine);
free(tmp);
return NULL;
}
...
}
> if (arch == NULL) {
> pr_err("%s: unsupported arch %d\n", __func__, e_machine);
> return errno;
> }
> if (parch)
> *parch = arch;
>
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
With the introduction of map_symbol__get_arch() to dynamically determine the
architecture via the DSO when ms->thread is NULL, will capstone disassembly
still work correctly when cross-compiling?
In tools/perf/util/capstone.c:symbol__disassemble_capstone():
e_machine = thread__e_machine_endian(args->ms->thread,
/*machine=*/NULL,
/*e_flags=*/NULL, &is_big_endian);
if (capstone_init(e_machine, &handle, is_64bit, is_big_endian, disassembler_style) < 0)
And similarly in symbol__disassemble_capstone_powerpc():
e_machine = thread__e_machine_endian(args->ms->thread,
/*machine=*/NULL,
/*e_flags=*/NULL, &is_big_endian);
Both functions bypass map_symbol__get_arch() entirely. When annotating without
a thread context, ms->thread is NULL, which causes thread__e_machine_endian()
to fall back to the host machine's architecture instead of using the DSO. Can
this break cross-platform annotation for capstone?
> @@ -1266,7 +1291,7 @@ int hist_entry__annotate_printf(struct hist_entry *he, struct evsel *evsel)
>
> apd.addr_fmt_width = annotated_source__addr_fmt_width(¬es->src->source,
> notes->src->start);
> - thread__get_arch(ms->thread, &apd.arch);
> + map_symbol__get_arch(ms, &apd.arch);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but should the return value of
map_symbol__get_arch() be checked here?
If map_symbol__get_arch() fails (e.g., when encountering an unsupported
architecture), it returns an error code and leaves apd.arch as NULL. This NULL
pointer is then passed through apd and eventually dereferenced:
annotation_line__print()
__hist_entry__get_data_type()
annotate_get_insn_location()
arch__is_powerpc()
tools/perf/util/disasm.c:arch__is_powerpc() {
return arch->id.e_machine == EM_PPC || arch->id.e_machine == EM_PPC64;
}
Can this lead to a segmentation fault when processing unsupported architectures?
> apd.dbg = dso__debuginfo(dso);
>
> list_for_each_entry(pos, ¬es->src->source, node) {
[ ... ]
> @@ -1371,7 +1396,7 @@ static int symbol__annotate_fprintf2(struct symbol *sym, FILE *fp,
> struct annotation_line *al;
>
> if (annotate_opts.code_with_type) {
> - thread__get_arch(apd->he->ms.thread, &apd->arch);
> + map_symbol__get_arch(&apd->he->ms, &apd->arch);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but this call also ignores the return value,
which could lead to the same NULL pointer dereference described above.
> apd->dbg = dso__debuginfo(map__dso(apd->he->ms.map));
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709033701.1117943-1-irogers@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 23:46 [PATCH v1 1/3] perf ui hists: In report UI ensure thread is set Ian Rogers
2026-07-08 23:46 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] perf ui hists: Remove duplicated thread in popup_action Ian Rogers
2026-07-08 23:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 23:46 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread Ian Rogers
2026-07-08 23:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 3:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf ui hists: In report UI ensure thread is set Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 3:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf ui hists: Remove duplicated thread in popup_action Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 3:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 3:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 3:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 3:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf hists browser: Increase MAX_OPTIONS to prevent stack buffer overflow Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 3:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 3:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf ui hists: In report UI ensure thread is set sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 " Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf ui hists: Remove duplicated thread in popup_action Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 17:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf hists browser: Increase MAX_OPTIONS to prevent stack buffer overflow Ian Rogers
2026-07-09 17:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf ui hists: In report UI ensure thread is set sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] perf hists browser: Increase MAX_OPTIONS to prevent stack buffer overflow Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] perf ui hists: In report UI ensure thread is set Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 3:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] perf disasm: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in arch__find() Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 2:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] perf ui hists: Fix uninitialized stack memory free on pstack allocation failure Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] perf ui hists: Fix memory leak in evsel__hists_browse() interactive loop Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 3:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] perf ui hists: Fix dso_filter reference leak and exit cleanup Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 3:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] perf ui hists: Fix NULL pointer array gap in add_script_opt() Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] perf ui hists: Remove duplicated thread in popup_action Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 3:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] perf hists browser: Increase MAX_OPTIONS to prevent stack buffer overflow sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] " Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] perf ui hists: Fix uninitialized stack memory free on pstack allocation failure Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] perf ui hists: Include limits.h for PATH_MAX definition Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] perf ui hists: Fix stack use-after-return in symbol_filter_str Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] perf disasm: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference and use-after-free in arch__find() Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] perf ui hists: Fix NULL pointer array gap in add_script_opt() Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] perf ui hists: In report UI ensure thread is set with reference counting Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] perf ui hists: Remove duplicated thread in popup_action Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] perf ui hists: Fix dso_filter reference leak and exit zoom cleanup Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 5:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:36 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] perf annotate: Be robust to annotating without a thread Ian Rogers
2026-07-10 6:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] perf hists browser: Increase MAX_OPTIONS to prevent stack buffer overflow sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709035721.9EE901F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox