Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] perf stat: Include PMU name and split uncore events per PMU in metric-only JSON output
@ 2026-07-14 17:40 Chun-Tse Shao
  2026-07-14 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chun-Tse Shao @ 2026-07-14 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung
  Cc: alexander.shishkin, jolsa, adrian.hunter, james.clark, afaerber,
	mani, dapeng1.mi, thomas.falcon, irogers, linux-perf-users,
	linux-kernel, Chun-Tse Shao

When running `perf stat` with `-A` (--no-aggr) and `--metric-only` in
JSON output mode (`-j`), `perf stat` evaluates metric expressions
across all matching PMUs (including uncore PMUs like `uncore_iio_0`,
`uncore_iio_1`, etc.).

However, `perf stat` previously formatted JSON output by printing only
"cpu" : "<id>" and grouping all metric values on a single line per CPU
without identifying which PMU instance evaluated each metric. As a
result, when an uncore event spans multiple PMU boxes, `perf stat`
printed repeated, ambiguous metric keys without PMU names.

Fix this by:
1. Including "pmu" : "<pmu_name>" in print_aggr_id_json when evsel->pmu
   is a non-core or hybrid PMU in AGGR_NONE mode (-A).
2. Starting a new JSON metric line in AGGR_NONE mode (-A) whenever the
   underlying PMU instance changes across PMU events.
3. Updating perf_json_output_lint.py to recognize the new "pmu" key in
   the JSON test suite.

Example output:
  $ perf stat -M iio_bandwidth_read -a -A --metric-only -j -I 1000
  {"interval" : 1.000314908, "cpu" : "0", "pmu" : "uncore_iio_0", "MB/s  iio_bandwidth_read" : "0.0"}
  {"interval" : 1.000314908, "cpu" : "0", "pmu" : "uncore_iio_1", "MB/s  iio_bandwidth_read" : "0.1"}
  {"interval" : 1.000314908, "cpu" : "0", "pmu" : "uncore_iio_11", "MB/s  iio_bandwidth_read" : "0.0"}
  ...
  {"interval" : 1.000314908, "cpu" : "56", "pmu" : "uncore_iio_0", "MB/s  iio_bandwidth_read" : "0.0"}
  {"interval" : 1.000314908, "cpu" : "56", "pmu" : "uncore_iio_1", "MB/s  iio_bandwidth_read" : "0.0"}
  {"interval" : 1.000314908, "cpu" : "56", "pmu" : "uncore_iio_11", "MB/s  iio_bandwidth_read" : "0.0"}

Signed-off-by: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>
Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview
---
 .../tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py  |  1 +
 tools/perf/util/stat-display.c                | 41 +++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py
index dafbde56cc76..36767905fcdb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ def check_json_output(expected_items):
       'metric-threshold': lambda x: x in ['unknown', 'good', 'less good', 'nearly bad', 'bad'],
       'metricgroup': lambda x: True,
       'node': lambda x: True,
+      'pmu': lambda x: True,
       'pcnt-running': lambda x: isfloat(x),
       'socket': lambda x: True,
       'thread': lambda x: True,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
index f94f1324d24a..d7f1feb63878 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
@@ -397,6 +397,8 @@ static void print_aggr_id_json(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct outstate
 			json_out(os, "\"cpu\" : \"%d\"",
 				id.cpu.cpu);
 		}
+		if (evsel && evsel->pmu && (!evsel->pmu->is_core || evsel__is_hybrid(evsel)))
+			json_out(os, "\"pmu\" : \"%s\"", evsel->pmu->name);
 		break;
 	case AGGR_THREAD:
 		json_out(os, "\"thread\" : \"%s-%d\"",
@@ -1009,11 +1011,12 @@ static void print_counter_aggrdata(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 
 static void print_metric_begin(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 			       struct evlist *evlist,
-			       struct outstate *os, int aggr_idx)
+			       struct outstate *os, int aggr_idx,
+			       struct evsel *counter)
 {
 	struct perf_stat_aggr *aggr;
 	struct aggr_cpu_id id;
-	struct evsel *evsel;
+	struct evsel *evsel = counter ?: evlist__first(evlist);
 
 	os->first = true;
 	if (!config->metric_only)
@@ -1028,7 +1031,6 @@ static void print_metric_begin(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 		else
 			fprintf(config->output, "%s", os->timestamp);
 	}
-	evsel = evlist__first(evlist);
 	id = config->aggr_map->map[aggr_idx];
 	aggr = &evsel->stats->aggr[aggr_idx];
 	aggr_printout(config, os, evsel, id, aggr->nr);
@@ -1066,7 +1068,7 @@ static void print_aggr(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 	 * Without each counter has its own line.
 	 */
 	cpu_aggr_map__for_each_idx(aggr_idx, config->aggr_map) {
-		print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, aggr_idx);
+		print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, aggr_idx, NULL);
 
 		evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, counter) {
 			print_counter_aggrdata(config, counter, aggr_idx, os);
@@ -1092,7 +1094,7 @@ static void print_aggr_cgroup(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 		os->cgrp = evsel->cgrp;
 
 		cpu_aggr_map__for_each_idx(aggr_idx, config->aggr_map) {
-			print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, aggr_idx);
+			print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, aggr_idx, NULL);
 
 			evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, counter) {
 				if (counter->cgrp != os->cgrp)
@@ -1128,7 +1130,8 @@ static void print_no_aggr_metric(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 
 	perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, all_idx, evlist__core(evlist)->user_requested_cpus) {
 		struct evsel *counter;
-		bool first = true;
+		struct perf_pmu *last_pmu = NULL;
+		bool line_open = false;
 
 		evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, counter) {
 			u64 ena, run, val;
@@ -1146,10 +1149,24 @@ static void print_no_aggr_metric(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 
 			os->evsel = counter;
 			os->id = aggr_cpu_id__cpu(cpu, /*data=*/NULL);
-			if (first) {
-				print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, aggr_idx);
-				first = false;
+
+			if (config->metric_only) {
+				struct perf_pmu *pmu = counter->pmu;
+
+				if (!evsel__is_tool(counter)) {
+					if (config->json_output && line_open && pmu != last_pmu) {
+						print_metric_end(config, os);
+						line_open = false;
+					}
+					if (!line_open) {
+						print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os,
+								   aggr_idx, counter);
+						line_open = true;
+						last_pmu = pmu;
+					}
+				}
 			}
+
 			val = ps->aggr[aggr_idx].counts.val;
 			ena = ps->aggr[aggr_idx].counts.ena;
 			run = ps->aggr[aggr_idx].counts.run;
@@ -1157,7 +1174,7 @@ static void print_no_aggr_metric(struct perf_stat_config *config,
 			uval = val * counter->scale;
 			printout(config, os, uval, run, ena, 1.0, aggr_idx);
 		}
-		if (!first)
+		if (line_open)
 			print_metric_end(config, os);
 	}
 }
@@ -1520,7 +1537,7 @@ static void print_cgroup_counter(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct evlist
 				print_metric_end(config, os);
 
 			os->cgrp = counter->cgrp;
-			print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, /*aggr_idx=*/0);
+			print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, /*aggr_idx=*/0, NULL);
 		}
 
 		print_counter(config, counter, os);
@@ -1570,7 +1587,7 @@ void evlist__print_counters(struct evlist *evlist, struct perf_stat_config *conf
 		} else if (config->cgroup_list) {
 			print_cgroup_counter(config, evlist, &os);
 		} else {
-			print_metric_begin(config, evlist, &os, /*aggr_idx=*/0);
+			print_metric_begin(config, evlist, &os, /*aggr_idx=*/0, NULL);
 			evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, counter) {
 				print_counter(config, counter, &os);
 			}
-- 
2.55.0.141.g00534a21ce-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Include PMU name and split uncore events per PMU in metric-only JSON output
  2026-07-14 17:40 [PATCH] perf stat: Include PMU name and split uncore events per PMU in metric-only JSON output Chun-Tse Shao
@ 2026-07-14 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-14 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chun-Tse Shao; +Cc: linux-perf-users

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] Bypassing `print_metric_begin` for tool events produces invalid, corrupted JSON and CSV output in `--metric-only` mode.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing bounds check on `aggr_idx` after searching `config->aggr_map` results in an out-of-bounds array read.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] perf stat: Include PMU name and split uncore events per PMU in metric-only JSON output ---
commit 418eb65331465e855519851f0438c3a1fe047563
Author: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>

perf stat: Include PMU name and split uncore events per PMU in metric-only JSON output

This commit modifies perf stat to include the PMU name in the metric-only JSON
output when running in no-aggr mode. It ensures that when an uncore event spans
multiple PMU instances, each instance is printed on a separate line with the
correct PMU identifier. The JSON linting script is also updated to recognize
the new PMU key.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> index f94f1324d24ac..d7f1feb638784 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1146,10 +1149,24 @@ static void print_no_aggr_metric(struct perf_stat_config *config,
>  
>  			os->evsel = counter;
>  			os->id = aggr_cpu_id__cpu(cpu, /*data=*/NULL);
> -			if (first) {
> -				print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os, aggr_idx);
> -				first = false;
> +
> +			if (config->metric_only) {
> +				struct perf_pmu *pmu = counter->pmu;
> +
> +				if (!evsel__is_tool(counter)) {

[Severity: Medium]
Does bypassing the print_metric_begin() initialization for tool events cause
invalid JSON output?

If a metric uses a tool event like duration_time as the metric leader,
skipping print_metric_begin() means the opening bracket, timestamp, and CPU ID
are not printed. This can leave the metric key-value pair as a bare string,
followed by a mid-stream bracket when a subsequent hardware PMU event is
processed.

> +					if (config->json_output && line_open && pmu != last_pmu) {
> +						print_metric_end(config, os);
> +						line_open = false;
> +					}
> +					if (!line_open) {
> +						print_metric_begin(config, evlist, os,
> +								   aggr_idx, counter);
> +						line_open = true;
> +						last_pmu = pmu;
> +					}
> +				}
>  			}
> +
>  			val = ps->aggr[aggr_idx].counts.val;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code read past the end of the
ps->aggr array if the CPU is not found in the aggregation map?

In print_no_aggr_metric(), there is a loop right before this block that
searches for the CPU:

cpu_aggr_map__for_each_idx(aggr_idx, config->aggr_map) {
	if (config->aggr_map->map[aggr_idx].cpu.cpu == cpu.cpu)
		break;
}

If a system lacks complete sysfs CPU topology, aggr_cpu_id__cpu() might return
an empty ID, and the CPU may not be found in config->aggr_map.

Could the loop terminate with aggr_idx == config->aggr_map->nr, causing this
line to unconditionally read out of bounds?

>  			ena = ps->aggr[aggr_idx].counts.ena;
>  			run = ps->aggr[aggr_idx].counts.run;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714174052.1826692-1-ctshao@google.com?part=1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-14 18:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-14 17:40 [PATCH] perf stat: Include PMU name and split uncore events per PMU in metric-only JSON output Chun-Tse Shao
2026-07-14 18:10 ` sashiko-bot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox