From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
dave@stgolabs.net, robin.murphy@arm.com, icheng@nvidia.com
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4 06/11] cxl/pci: Add the PMUs after configuring events
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 08:59:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805155911.1304807-7-dave.jiang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805155911.1304807-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>
cxl_pci_probe() adds the CPMU instances before configuring the event
interrupts. Both take an MSI/MSI-X vector the device names in its own
capability registers, and the spec lets a device point several capabilities
at one message number, so the two can collide.
They do not fail the same way. A failed devm_cxl_pmu_add() only breaks out
of the loop, while a failed cxl_event_config() aborts probe and the memory
device never appears. Going PMUs-first therefore lets a peripheral facility
take the vector and deny it to one that matters.
Configure events first, so a collision costs the PMU rather than the
memdev. Return 0 explicitly afterwards, since rc still holds any PMU error
that cxl_event_config() used to overwrite on the way past.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
---
v4:
- New patch, ahead of the PMU dropping IRQF_SHARED. Without this that
change can turn a shared vector into a probe failure for the whole
memdev rather than a missing PMU (sashiko-bot).
---
drivers/cxl/pci.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
index 267c679b0b3c..975d32716762 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
@@ -894,6 +894,10 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
if (rc)
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "No CXL FWCTL setup\n");
+ rc = cxl_event_config(host_bridge, mds, irq_avail);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
pmu_count = cxl_count_regblock(pdev, CXL_REGLOC_RBI_PMU);
if (pmu_count < 0)
return pmu_count;
@@ -920,13 +924,10 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
}
}
- rc = cxl_event_config(host_bridge, mds, irq_avail);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
pci_save_state(pdev);
- return rc;
+ /* A missing PMU is not fatal, the memdev is still usable */
+ return 0;
}
static const struct pci_device_id cxl_mem_pci_tbl[] = {
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 15:59 [RESEND PATCH v4 00/11] perf/cxlpmu: Misc sashiko raised issues fixes Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 01/11] perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 02/11] perf/cxl: Clear stale event fields before reprogramming a counter Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 03/11] perf/cxl: Fix the counter overflow delta fixup Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 04/11] perf/cxl: Accept an overflow interrupt on MSI message number 0 Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 05/11] perf/cxl: Split the MSI vector out of info->irq Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-08-05 16:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 06/11] cxl/pci: Add the PMUs after configuring events Alison Schofield
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 07/11] perf/cxl: Don't share the overflow interrupt, and keep it pinned Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 08/11] perf/cxl: Unfreeze counters after handling an overflow interrupt Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:35 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 09/11] perf/cxl: Validate the hardware-reported counter width Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 10/11] perf/cxl: Don't log through pmu.dev in the overflow interrupt handler Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 11/11] perf/cxl: Clear stale overflow status before using a counter Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805155911.1304807-7-dave.jiang@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox