Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	<jic23@kernel.org>, <will@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<dave@stgolabs.net>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <icheng@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 06/11] cxl/pci: Add the PMUs after configuring events
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:51:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anNp99A54UyI5f8k@aschofie-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805155911.1304807-7-dave.jiang@intel.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 08:59:06AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> cxl_pci_probe() adds the CPMU instances before configuring the event
> interrupts. Both take an MSI/MSI-X vector the device names in its own
> capability registers, and the spec lets a device point several capabilities
> at one message number, so the two can collide.
> 
> They do not fail the same way. A failed devm_cxl_pmu_add() only breaks out
> of the loop, while a failed cxl_event_config() aborts probe and the memory
> device never appears. Going PMUs-first therefore lets a peripheral facility
> take the vector and deny it to one that matters.
> 
> Configure events first, so a collision costs the PMU rather than the
> memdev. Return 0 explicitly afterwards, since rc still holds any PMU error
> that cxl_event_config() used to overwrite on the way past.

Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05 15:59 [RESEND PATCH v4 00/11] perf/cxlpmu: Misc sashiko raised issues fixes Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 01/11] perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 02/11] perf/cxl: Clear stale event fields before reprogramming a counter Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 03/11] perf/cxl: Fix the counter overflow delta fixup Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 04/11] perf/cxl: Accept an overflow interrupt on MSI message number 0 Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 05/11] perf/cxl: Split the MSI vector out of info->irq Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 06/11] cxl/pci: Add the PMUs after configuring events Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:51   ` Alison Schofield [this message]
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 07/11] perf/cxl: Don't share the overflow interrupt, and keep it pinned Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 08/11] perf/cxl: Unfreeze counters after handling an overflow interrupt Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:35     ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 09/11] perf/cxl: Validate the hardware-reported counter width Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 10/11] perf/cxl: Don't log through pmu.dev in the overflow interrupt handler Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 11/11] perf/cxl: Clear stale overflow status before using a counter Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:21   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anNp99A54UyI5f8k@aschofie-mobl2.lan \
    --to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox