Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move()
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 12:49:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806124943.2D3EF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806123604.271277-9-acme@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Heap Out-of-Bounds Read when writing event to perf.data in `jit_repipe_code_move()`
--

--- Patch [8]: [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move() ---
commit b900743750fdefef6d63a1e65a54cf9d26b1477d
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move()

This commit fixes a memory leak in jit_repipe_code_move() by freeing the
event allocated via calloc at the out label, matching the behavior in
jit_repipe_code_load().

Fixes: 9b07e27f88b9 ("perf inject: Add jitdump mmap injection support")
Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> index ae63366b86c6d..91aa1eea8229f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> @@ -685,6 +685,7 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_move(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)

[ ... ]

>  		build_id__mark_dso_hit(tool, event, &sample, jd->machine);
>  out:
>  	perf_sample__exit(&sample);
> +	free(event);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code have a heap out-of-bounds
read when calculating the event size?

In jit_repipe_code_move(), the event being freed here is initially allocated
with a hardcoded extra 16 bytes:

    event = calloc(1, sizeof(*event) + 16);

However, the header size is calculated using idr_size:

    event->mmap2.header.size = (sizeof(event->mmap2) -
                    (sizeof(event->mmap2.filename) - size) + idr_size);

If idr_size is greater than 16 (which can happen when multiple sample types
like TID, TIME, and CPU are enabled), and the path is very long, the
calculated header.size can exceed the allocated size.

When this event is later injected:

tools/perf/util/jitdump.c:jit_inject_event() {
    ...
    size = perf_data__write(jd->output, event, event->header.size);
    ...
}

Could this cause perf_data__write() to read out-of-bounds from the heap,
potentially leaking adjacent memory into the perf.data file or causing a crash
if the read crosses into an unmapped page?

>  	return ret;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806123604.271277-1-acme@kernel.org?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 12:35 [PATCHES v3 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf jitdump: Fix extended header read that always fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 13:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf jitdump: Validate code_size against total_size in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf jitdump: Prevent integer underflow in debug info size calculation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Bounds-check debug entry byte-swap loop Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 15:21     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf jitdump: Fix funlockfile on unlocked stream in jit_open() error path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:35 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:49   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 12:36 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf jitdump: Use dirname() return value in jit_open() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:36 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf jitdump: Validate debug entries on native (non-swap) path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 13:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:36 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf jitdump: Validate sym string NUL-termination in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 13:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:36 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 13:06   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260806124943.2D3EF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox